Reproducibility Study of ITI-GEN: Inclusive Text-to-Image Generation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The provided research paper is a reproducibility study of the "ITI-GEN: Inclusive Text-to-Image Generation" model.
- The study aims to replicate the key findings and claims made in the original paper.
- It covers the scope of reproducibility, technical details, critical analysis, and potential implications.
Plain English Explanation
The research paper examines a model that generates images from text descriptions. The goal is to ensure the model produces diverse and inclusive images, avoiding biases that may lead to stereotypical or unrepresentative outputs.
The study attempts to replicate the original findings to verify their validity and reliability. It looks at the experimental design, the model architecture, and the key insights reported in the initial research.
The critical analysis section discusses any limitations or areas for further investigation identified in the study. It also raises additional questions or concerns that were not addressed in the original paper.
Overall, this reproducibility study aims to validate the effectiveness of the inclusive text-to-image generation model and identify any potential issues or areas for improvement. By replicating the research, the findings can be more confidently applied and built upon in the field.
Technical Explanation
The reproducibility study follows the experimental setup and evaluation methodology described in the original "ITI-GEN" paper. It replicates the training and testing of the model on the same datasets and metrics.
The model architecture is closely examined, including the techniques used to promote inclusive and unbiased image generation. The study verifies the implementation details and analyzes the performance of the model on various evaluation tasks.
The critical analysis section discusses any discrepancies or deviations from the original paper's findings, as well as potential limitations of the reproducibility study itself. It also suggests areas for further research and improvement.
Critical Analysis
The reproducibility study acknowledges several caveats and limitations in the original "ITI-GEN" paper. For example, the dataset used for training and evaluation may not be representative of the entire population, which could lead to biases in the generated images.
Additionally, the study highlights the need for more comprehensive evaluation metrics to assess the inclusiveness and representational fairness of the generated images. The current metrics may not capture all aspects of bias and diversity.
Furthermore, the study suggests exploring alternative model architectures or training approaches that could further enhance the inclusivity of the text-to-image generation process. The critical analysis encourages readers to think critically about the research and consider ways to address the identified limitations.
Conclusion
The reproducibility study of the "ITI-GEN: Inclusive Text-to-Image Generation" model provides valuable insights into the validity and reliability of the original research. It verifies the key findings and claims, while also highlighting areas for improvement and further investigation.
The study's rigorous examination of the model's technical details and its critical analysis of the research contribute to a better understanding of the challenges and opportunities in developing inclusive and unbiased text-to-image generation systems. These insights can inform future research and development in this field, ultimately leading to more equitable and representative image generation models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Reproducibility Study of ITI-GEN: Inclusive Text-to-Image Generation
Daniel Gallo Fern'andez, Ru{a}zvan-Andrei Matisan, Alejandro Monroy Mu~noz, Janusz Partyka
Text-to-image generative models often present issues regarding fairness with respect to certain sensitive attributes, such as gender or skin tone. This study aims to reproduce the results presented in ITI-GEN: Inclusive Text-to-Image Generation by Zhang et al. (2023a), which introduces a model to improve inclusiveness in these kinds of models. We show that most of the claims made by the authors about ITI-GEN hold: it improves the diversity and quality of generated images, it is scalable to different domains, it has plug-and-play capabilities, and it is efficient from a computational point of view. However, ITI-GEN sometimes uses undesired attributes as proxy features and it is unable to disentangle some pairs of (correlated) attributes such as gender and baldness. In addition, when the number of considered attributes increases, the training time grows exponentially and ITI-GEN struggles to generate inclusive images for all elements in the joint distribution. To solve these issues, we propose using Hard Prompt Search with negative prompting, a method that does not require training and that handles negation better than vanilla Hard Prompt Search. Nonetheless, Hard Prompt Search (with or without negative prompting) cannot be used for continuous attributes that are hard to express in natural language, an area where ITI-GEN excels as it is guided by images during training. Finally, we propose combining ITI-GEN and Hard Prompt Search with negative prompting.
Read more7/30/2024
0
AITTI: Learning Adaptive Inclusive Token for Text-to-Image Generation
Xinyu Hou, Xiaoming Li, Chen Change Loy
Despite the high-quality results of text-to-image generation, stereotypical biases have been spotted in their generated contents, compromising the fairness of generative models. In this work, we propose to learn adaptive inclusive tokens to shift the attribute distribution of the final generative outputs. Unlike existing de-biasing approaches, our method requires neither explicit attribute specification nor prior knowledge of the bias distribution. Specifically, the core of our method is a lightweight adaptive mapping network, which can customize the inclusive tokens for the concepts to be de-biased, making the tokens generalizable to unseen concepts regardless of their original bias distributions. This is achieved by tuning the adaptive mapping network with a handful of balanced and inclusive samples using an anchor loss. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms previous bias mitigation methods without attribute specification while preserving the alignment between generative results and text descriptions. Moreover, our method achieves comparable performance to models that require specific attributes or editing directions for generation. Extensive experiments showcase the effectiveness of our adaptive inclusive tokens in mitigating stereotypical bias in text-to-image generation. The code will be available at https://github.com/itsmag11/AITTI.
Read more6/21/2024
✨
0
TIBET: Identifying and Evaluating Biases in Text-to-Image Generative Models
Aditya Chinchure, Pushkar Shukla, Gaurav Bhatt, Kiri Salij, Kartik Hosanagar, Leonid Sigal, Matthew Turk
Text-to-Image (TTI) generative models have shown great progress in the past few years in terms of their ability to generate complex and high-quality imagery. At the same time, these models have been shown to suffer from harmful biases, including exaggerated societal biases (e.g., gender, ethnicity), as well as incidental correlations that limit such a model's ability to generate more diverse imagery. In this paper, we propose a general approach to study and quantify a broad spectrum of biases, for any TTI model and for any prompt, using counterfactual reasoning. Unlike other works that evaluate generated images on a predefined set of bias axes, our approach automatically identifies potential biases that might be relevant to the given prompt, and measures those biases. In addition, we complement quantitative scores with post-hoc explanations in terms of semantic concepts in the images generated. We show that our method is uniquely capable of explaining complex multi-dimensional biases through semantic concepts, as well as the intersectionality between different biases for any given prompt. We perform extensive user studies to illustrate that the results of our method and analysis are consistent with human judgements.
Read more7/18/2024
🤯
0
Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigation
Yixin Wan, Arjun Subramonian, Anaelia Ovalle, Zongyu Lin, Ashima Suvarna, Christina Chance, Hritik Bansal, Rebecca Pattichis, Kai-Wei Chang
The recent advancement of large and powerful models with Text-to-Image (T2I) generation abilities -- such as OpenAI's DALLE-3 and Google's Gemini -- enables users to generate high-quality images from textual prompts. However, it has become increasingly evident that even simple prompts could cause T2I models to exhibit conspicuous social bias in generated images. Such bias might lead to both allocational and representational harms in society, further marginalizing minority groups. Noting this problem, a large body of recent works has been dedicated to investigating different dimensions of bias in T2I systems. However, an extensive review of these studies is lacking, hindering a systematic understanding of current progress and research gaps. We present the first extensive survey on bias in T2I generative models. In this survey, we review prior studies on dimensions of bias: Gender, Skintone, and Geo-Culture. Specifically, we discuss how these works define, evaluate, and mitigate different aspects of bias. We found that: (1) while gender and skintone biases are widely studied, geo-cultural bias remains under-explored; (2) most works on gender and skintone bias investigated occupational association, while other aspects are less frequently studied; (3) almost all gender bias works overlook non-binary identities in their studies; (4) evaluation datasets and metrics are scattered, with no unified framework for measuring biases; and (5) current mitigation methods fail to resolve biases comprehensively. Based on current limitations, we point out future research directions that contribute to human-centric definitions, evaluations, and mitigation of biases. We hope to highlight the importance of studying biases in T2I systems, as well as encourage future efforts to holistically understand and tackle biases, building fair and trustworthy T2I technologies for everyone.
Read more5/3/2024