Resampling methods for Private Statistical Inference

Overview

• The paper explores the task of constructing confidence intervals with differential privacy, which is a way to protect the privacy of individuals in a dataset.
• The authors propose two private variants of the non-parametric bootstrap, a statistical technique for estimating uncertainty.
• These methods can privately compute the median of multiple "little bootstraps" run on partitions of the data, and provide bounds on the accuracy of the resulting confidence intervals.
• The authors show that their methods achieve similar coverage accuracy to existing approaches while providing notably shorter confidence intervals.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a problem called constructing confidence intervals with differential privacy. Confidence intervals are a way to express the uncertainty around a statistical estimate, like the average or median of a dataset. Differential privacy is a technique for protecting the privacy of individuals in a dataset.

The authors propose two new methods that combine differential privacy with the non-parametric bootstrap, a common way to estimate uncertainty. Their key idea is to privately compute the median of many "little bootstraps" - that is, running the bootstrap method on small partitions of the data and combining the results.

This allows them to get accurate confidence intervals while preserving the privacy of the individuals in the dataset. In fact, their methods achieve similar accuracy to non-private baselines, but with confidence intervals that are notably shorter (around 10 times smaller) than previous private approaches.

This is an important result, as it shows it's possible to get good uncertainty estimates while still protecting people's privacy. The authors test their methods on real-world data for tasks like estimating the mean, median, and doing logistic regression.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes two new differentially private variants of the non-parametric bootstrap for constructing confidence intervals. The key innovation is to privately compute the median of the results from running many "little bootstraps" on partitions of the data.

Specifically, the authors first split the dataset into $k$ partitions. They then run the standard non-parametric bootstrap on each partition, obtaining $k$ bootstrap estimates. Rather than averaging these estimates, they privately compute the median of the $k$ values. This median value is then used as the final bootstrap estimate.

The authors prove that this private median-of-little-bootstraps approach enjoys the same error rates as the non-private bootstrap, up to logarithmic factors in the sample size $n$. Intuitively, this is because the median is a robust statistic that is not overly sensitive to changes in a small number of data points.

The authors empirically validate their methods on tasks like mean estimation, median estimation, and logistic regression, using both real and synthetic data. They find that their private methods achieve similar coverage accuracy to existing approaches, but with notably shorter ($\gtrsim$ 10x) confidence intervals.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical and empirical analysis of their proposed methods. The key limitation is that the error rates are only asymptotic - the authors do not provide finite-sample guarantees. This means the methods may not perform as well in practice for small datasets.

Additionally, the authors only consider the case of continuous data. It's not immediately clear how their techniques would extend to discrete or categorical data, or to more complex statistical models beyond the ones tested.

Another potential issue is the reliance on the median statistic. While the median is robust, it may not be the optimal choice for all tasks and data distributions. It would be interesting to explore other robust summary statistics that could be privately computed.

Overall, this is a promising piece of research that advances the state-of-the-art in differentially private uncertainty quantification. The authors have made a valuable contribution to the field, but there remain opportunities for further refinement and extension of their techniques.

Conclusion

This paper proposes new methods for constructing differentially private confidence intervals using a private variant of the non-parametric bootstrap. The key idea is to privately compute the median of multiple "little bootstraps" run on partitions of the data.

The authors show that their methods achieve similar coverage accuracy to existing approaches, while providing notably shorter confidence intervals. This is an important result, as it demonstrates the ability to get good uncertainty estimates while still protecting individual privacy in a dataset.

While the paper has some limitations, it represents a significant advance in the field of differentially private statistical inference. The techniques developed here could have broad applications in machine learning, data analysis, and other domains where privacy-preserving inference is crucial.