Resolving Discrepancies in Compute-Optimal Scaling of Language Models
2406.19146
0
0
Abstract
Kaplan et al. and Hoffmann et al. developed influential scaling laws for the optimal model size as a function of the compute budget, but these laws yield substantially different predictions. We explain the discrepancy by reproducing the Kaplan scaling law on two datasets (OpenWebText2 and RefinedWeb) and identifying three factors causing the difference: last layer computational cost, warmup duration, and scale-dependent optimizer tuning. With these factors corrected, we obtain excellent agreement with the Hoffmann et al. (i.e., Chinchilla) scaling law. Counter to a hypothesis of Hoffmann et al., we find that careful learning rate decay is not essential for the validity of their scaling law. As a secondary result, we derive scaling laws for the optimal learning rate and batch size, finding that tuning the AdamW $beta_2$ parameter is essential at lower batch sizes.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper aims to resolve discrepancies in the compute-optimal scaling of language models, which refers to the relationship between the performance of a language model and the computational resources used to train it.
- The authors conduct a comprehensive empirical analysis to understand the scaling laws governing language model performance and provide insights into the optimal use of computational resources for training.
- The research builds on previous work on scaling laws for language models and the predictability of language model performance.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the relationship between the performance of language models (AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text) and the amount of computational power used to train them. Previous research has found that language model performance tends to improve as more computational resources are used, a phenomenon known as "scaling laws." However, there have been some discrepancies in how these scaling laws have been observed and understood.
The authors of this paper conducted a comprehensive analysis to better understand the scaling laws governing language models. They looked at how different factors, such as the size of the language model and the amount of training data, affect the optimal use of computational resources. By doing this, they aimed to provide insights that can help researchers and engineers make more informed decisions about how to allocate computational resources when training language models.
The research builds on previous work that has explored the scaling laws for language models and the predictability of language model performance. The authors of this paper hope that their findings will contribute to a better understanding of the optimal use of computational resources for training language models, which could have important implications for the development of more capable and efficient language AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive empirical analysis to understand the scaling laws governing language model performance. The authors investigate the relationship between compute-optimal scaling and factors such as model size, dataset size, and training duration.
The researchers conducted experiments using various language models, including GPT-3, Megatron-LM, and Chinchilla, across different tasks and datasets. They systematically varied the model size, dataset size, and training duration to observe the impact on performance and compute-optimal scaling.
The key insights from the paper include:
- The observed compute-optimal scaling exponents for language models are lower than previously reported, suggesting that the optimal use of computational resources may be more nuanced than previously thought.
- The compute-optimal scaling exponents are influenced by factors such as the model size and the specific task or dataset, highlighting the need for a more granular understanding of scaling laws.
- The authors propose a new model that can accurately predict the compute-optimal scaling behavior of language models, which could inform the design of more efficient and cost-effective training approaches.
The findings in this paper build on and extend previous research on scaling laws for language models and the predictability of language model performance. By providing a more nuanced understanding of compute-optimal scaling, the authors aim to contribute to the ongoing efforts to navigate the scaling laws and achieve compute-optimal performance in the development of advanced language AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough empirical analysis and offers valuable insights into the scaling laws governing language models. However, there are a few caveats and areas for further research that could be considered:
- The experiments were conducted primarily on a limited set of language models and tasks. Expanding the analysis to a wider range of models and tasks could help validate the generalizability of the findings.
- The authors acknowledge that their proposed model for predicting compute-optimal scaling behavior may not capture all the complexities involved in real-world training scenarios. Further research on the factors that influence scaling laws could help refine the predictive model.
- While the paper provides insights into the optimal use of computational resources, it does not directly address the environmental and economic implications of the compute-intensive nature of training large language models. [Exploring more energy-efficient and cost-effective training approaches could be an important area for future research.
Overall, the paper offers a significant contribution to the ongoing discussions and research on the scaling laws and optimal use of computational resources for language models. The insights provided could inform the development of more efficient and effective language AI systems, but further research is needed to address the remaining challenges and considerations.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive empirical analysis to resolve discrepancies in the compute-optimal scaling of language models. The authors investigate the relationship between various factors, such as model size, dataset size, and training duration, and their impact on the optimal use of computational resources.
The key findings include lower observed compute-optimal scaling exponents than previously reported, the influence of specific factors on scaling behavior, and the development of a new predictive model for compute-optimal scaling. These insights contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the scaling laws governing language models and could inform the design of more efficient and cost-effective training approaches for advanced language AI systems.
The research builds on and extends previous work on scaling laws for language models and the predictability of language model performance, further advancing our understanding of the optimal use of computational resources in the development of increasingly capable and efficient language AI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Unraveling the Mystery of Scaling Laws: Part I
Hui Su, Zhi Tian, Xiaoyu Shen, Xunliang Cai
0
0
Scaling law principles indicate a power-law correlation between loss and variables such as model size, dataset size, and computational resources utilized during training. These principles play a vital role in optimizing various aspects of model pre-training, ultimately contributing to the success of large language models such as GPT-4, Llama and Gemini. However, the original scaling law paper by OpenAI did not disclose the complete details necessary to derive the precise scaling law formulas, and their conclusions are only based on models containing up to 1.5 billion parameters. Though some subsequent works attempt to unveil these details and scale to larger models, they often neglect the training dependency of important factors such as the learning rate, context length and batch size, leading to their failure to establish a reliable formula for predicting the test loss trajectory. In this technical report, we confirm that the scaling law formulations proposed in the original OpenAI paper remain valid when scaling the model size up to 33 billion, but the constant coefficients in these formulas vary significantly with the experiment setup. We meticulously identify influential factors and provide transparent, step-by-step instructions to estimate all constant terms in scaling-law formulas by training on models with only 1M~60M parameters. Using these estimated formulas, we showcase the capability to accurately predict various attributes for models with up to 33B parameters before their training, including (1) the minimum possible test loss; (2) the minimum required training steps and processed tokens to achieve a specific loss; (3) the critical batch size with an optimal time/computation trade-off at any loss value; and (4) the complete test loss trajectory with arbitrary batch size.
4/8/2024
Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasks
Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Georgios Smyrnis, Vaishaal Shankar, Suchin Gururangan, Mitchell Wortsman, Rulin Shao, Jean Mercat, Alex Fang, Jeffrey Li, Sedrick Keh, Rui Xin, Marianna Nezhurina, Igor Vasiljevic, Jenia Jitsev, Luca Soldaini, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Gabriel Ilharco, Pang Wei Koh, Shuran Song, Thomas Kollar, Yair Carmon, Achal Dave, Reinhard Heckel, Niklas Muennighoff, Ludwig Schmidt
0
0
Scaling laws are useful guides for derisking expensive training runs, as they predict performance of large models using cheaper, small-scale experiments. However, there remain gaps between current scaling studies and how language models are ultimately trained and evaluated. For instance, scaling is usually studied in the compute-optimal training regime (i.e., Chinchilla optimal regime). In contrast, models are often over-trained to reduce inference costs. Moreover, scaling laws mostly predict loss on next-token prediction, but models are usually compared on downstream task performance. To address both shortcomings, we create a testbed of 104 models with 0.011B to 6.9B parameters trained with various numbers of tokens on three data distributions. First, we fit scaling laws that extrapolate in both the amount of over-training and the number of model parameters. This enables us to predict the validation loss of a 1.4B parameter, 900B token run (i.e., 32$times$ over-trained) and a 6.9B parameter, 138B token run (i.e., a compute-optimal run)$unicode{x2014}$each from experiments that take 300$times$ less compute. Second, we relate the perplexity of a language model to its downstream task performance by proposing a power law. We use this law to predict top-1 error averaged over downstream tasks for the two aforementioned models, using experiments that take 20$times$ less compute. Our experiments are available at https://github.com/mlfoundations/scaling.
6/18/2024
✅
More Compute Is What You Need
Zhen Guo
0
0
Large language model pre-training has become increasingly expensive, with most practitioners relying on scaling laws to allocate compute budgets for model size and training tokens, commonly referred to as Compute-Optimal or Chinchilla Optimal. In this paper, we hypothesize a new scaling law that suggests model performance depends mostly on the amount of compute spent for transformer-based models, independent of the specific allocation to model size and dataset size. Using this unified scaling law, we predict that (a) for inference efficiency, training should prioritize smaller model sizes and larger training datasets, and (b) assuming the exhaustion of available web datasets, scaling the model size might be the only way to further improve model performance.
5/3/2024
📈
Navigating Scaling Laws: Compute Optimality in Adaptive Model Training
Sotiris Anagnostidis, Gregor Bachmann, Imanol Schlag, Thomas Hofmann
0
0
In recent years, the state-of-the-art in deep learning has been dominated by very large models that have been pre-trained on vast amounts of data. The paradigm is very simple: investing more computational resources (optimally) leads to better performance, and even predictably so; neural scaling laws have been derived that accurately forecast the performance of a network for a desired level of compute. This leads to the notion of a `compute-optimal' model, i.e. a model that allocates a given level of compute during training optimally to maximize performance. In this work, we extend the concept of optimality by allowing for an `adaptive' model, i.e. a model that can change its shape during training. By doing so, we can design adaptive models that optimally traverse between the underlying scaling laws and outpace their `static' counterparts, leading to a significant reduction in the required compute to reach a given target performance. We show that our approach generalizes across modalities and different shape parameters.
5/24/2024