Rethinking Semantic Parsing for Large Language Models: Enhancing LLM Performance with Semantic Hints

Read original: arXiv:2409.14469 - Published 9/24/2024 by Kaikai An, Shuzheng Si, Helan Hu, Haozhe Zhao, Yuchi Wang, Qingyan Guo, Baobao Chang
Total Score

0

Rethinking Semantic Parsing for Large Language Models: Enhancing LLM Performance with Semantic Hints

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Explores how to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating semantic information
  • Proposes a new approach called "semantic parsing" to better leverage structured knowledge
  • Evaluates the benefits of this approach on various natural language tasks

Plain English Explanation

This paper investigates ways to improve the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. The key idea is to enhance these models by incorporating semantic information.

Semantic information refers to the meaning and structure of language, beyond just the surface-level words. The researchers argue that by explicitly modeling this semantic knowledge, LLMs can perform better on a variety of natural language tasks, such as question answering, text summarization, and code generation.

The paper introduces a new technique called "semantic parsing," which aims to parse input text into a structured, machine-readable representation of its meaning. This semantic representation is then used to guide and inform the LLM's processing, helping it better understand the intent and context behind the language.

Overall, the goal is to leverage the strengths of LLMs while also addressing some of their potential limitations, particularly when it comes to capturing and reasoning about complex, structured semantics.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a new approach called "Semantic Parsing for Large Language Models" (SP-LLM) that aims to enhance LLM performance by incorporating semantic information. The key components of this approach are:

  1. Semantic Parsing: The input text is parsed into a structured, machine-readable semantic representation, such as a knowledge graph or logical form. This captures the meaning and relationships between entities, events, and concepts in the text.

  2. Semantic Hints: The semantic representation is then used to provide "hints" or additional context to the LLM during its processing of the input. This can take the form of auxiliary input features, attention weights, or other architectural modifications.

  3. Task-specific Evaluation: The researchers evaluate the SP-LLM approach on a range of natural language tasks, including question answering, text summarization, and code generation. They compare the performance of the semantic-aware LLM against standard LLM baselines.

The experiments show that incorporating semantic information can lead to significant improvements in LLM performance, particularly on tasks that require deeper understanding of the input's meaning and structure. The semantic parsing component helps the LLM better grasp the underlying semantics, which in turn enhances its ability to reason about and generate appropriate outputs.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach for enhancing LLM capabilities by leveraging semantic information. However, a few potential limitations and areas for further research are worth noting:

  1. Scalability and Generalization: While the experiments demonstrate the benefits of semantic parsing, it's unclear how well the approach would scale to larger, more diverse datasets and domains. Ensuring the robustness and generalizability of the semantic parsing component is an important area for further investigation.

  2. Interpretability and Explainability: The paper focuses primarily on improving LLM performance, but does not delve deeply into the interpretability or explainability of the semantic parsing process. Understanding how the semantic information is being utilized by the LLM could provide valuable insights and enhance trust in the model's decisions.

  3. Interaction with other Modalities: The current work focuses on text-based tasks, but many real-world applications involve multimodal inputs (e.g., text, images, videos). Exploring how semantic parsing can be extended to handle and integrate information from diverse modalities is an important future direction.

  4. Computational Efficiency: Incorporating additional semantic processing components may increase the computational complexity and resource requirements of the LLM system. Balancing performance gains with efficiency and practicality is a key consideration for real-world deployment.

Overall, the paper presents a promising approach for enhancing LLM capabilities by leveraging semantic information. However, further research is needed to address the potential limitations and explore the broader implications of this technique.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach called "Semantic Parsing for Large Language Models" (SP-LLM) that aims to improve the performance of LLMs by incorporating semantic information. The key idea is to parse the input text into a structured, machine-readable representation of its meaning, and then use this semantic information to guide and enhance the LLM's processing.

The experimental results demonstrate that this semantic-aware approach can lead to significant improvements in LLM performance on a range of natural language tasks, such as question answering, text summarization, and code generation. This suggests that explicitly modeling and leveraging semantic knowledge can be a valuable strategy for enhancing the capabilities of these powerful language models.

While the paper presents a compelling approach, it also highlights the need for further research to address potential scalability, interpretability, and efficiency challenges. Exploring the integration of semantic information with other modalities and developing more robust and generalized semantic parsing techniques are important directions for future work.

Overall, this research represents an important step towards enhancing the performance of large language models and advancing the field of natural language processing.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Rethinking Semantic Parsing for Large Language Models: Enhancing LLM Performance with Semantic Hints
Total Score

0

Rethinking Semantic Parsing for Large Language Models: Enhancing LLM Performance with Semantic Hints

Kaikai An, Shuzheng Si, Helan Hu, Haozhe Zhao, Yuchi Wang, Qingyan Guo, Baobao Chang

Semantic Parsing aims to capture the meaning of a sentence and convert it into a logical, structured form. Previous studies show that semantic parsing enhances the performance of smaller models (e.g., BERT) on downstream tasks. However, it remains unclear whether the improvements extend similarly to LLMs. In this paper, our empirical findings reveal that, unlike smaller models, directly adding semantic parsing results into LLMs reduces their performance. To overcome this, we propose SENSE, a novel prompting approach that embeds semantic hints within the prompt. Experiments show that SENSE consistently improves LLMs' performance across various tasks, highlighting the potential of integrating semantic information to improve LLM capabilities.

Read more

9/24/2024

📶

Total Score

0

Potential and Limitations of LLMs in Capturing Structured Semantics: A Case Study on SRL

Ning Cheng, Zhaohui Yan, Ziming Wang, Zhijie Li, Jiaming Yu, Zilong Zheng, Kewei Tu, Jinan Xu, Wenjuan Han

Large Language Models (LLMs) play a crucial role in capturing structured semantics to enhance language understanding, improve interpretability, and reduce bias. Nevertheless, an ongoing controversy exists over the extent to which LLMs can grasp structured semantics. To assess this, we propose using Semantic Role Labeling (SRL) as a fundamental task to explore LLMs' ability to extract structured semantics. In our assessment, we employ the prompting approach, which leads to the creation of our few-shot SRL parser, called PromptSRL. PromptSRL enables LLMs to map natural languages to explicit semantic structures, which provides an interpretable window into the properties of LLMs. We find interesting potential: LLMs can indeed capture semantic structures, and scaling-up doesn't always mirror potential. Additionally, limitations of LLMs are observed in C-arguments, etc. Lastly, we are surprised to discover that significant overlap in the errors is made by both LLMs and untrained humans, accounting for almost 30% of all errors.

Read more

5/13/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Analyzing the Role of Semantic Representations in the Era of Large Language Models

Zhijing Jin, Yuen Chen, Fernando Gonzalez, Jiarui Liu, Jiayi Zhang, Julian Michael, Bernhard Scholkopf, Mona Diab

Traditionally, natural language processing (NLP) models often use a rich set of features created by linguistic expertise, such as semantic representations. However, in the era of large language models (LLMs), more and more tasks are turned into generic, end-to-end sequence generation problems. In this paper, we investigate the question: what is the role of semantic representations in the era of LLMs? Specifically, we investigate the effect of Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) across five diverse NLP tasks. We propose an AMR-driven chain-of-thought prompting method, which we call AMRCoT, and find that it generally hurts performance more than it helps. To investigate what AMR may have to offer on these tasks, we conduct a series of analysis experiments. We find that it is difficult to predict which input examples AMR may help or hurt on, but errors tend to arise with multi-word expressions, named entities, and in the final inference step where the LLM must connect its reasoning over the AMR to its prediction. We recommend focusing on these areas for future work in semantic representations for LLMs. Our code: https://github.com/causalNLP/amr_llm.

Read more

5/3/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Can LLMs Effectively Leverage Graph Structural Information through Prompts, and Why?

Jin Huang, Xingjian Zhang, Qiaozhu Mei, Jiaqi Ma

Large language models (LLMs) are gaining increasing attention for their capability to process graphs with rich text attributes, especially in a zero-shot fashion. Recent studies demonstrate that LLMs obtain decent text classification performance on common text-rich graph benchmarks, and the performance can be improved by appending encoded structural information as natural languages into prompts. We aim to understand why the incorporation of structural information inherent in graph data can improve the prediction performance of LLMs. First, we rule out the concern of data leakage by curating a novel leakage-free dataset and conducting a comparative analysis alongside a previously widely-used dataset. Second, as past work usually encodes the ego-graph by describing the graph structure in natural language, we ask the question: do LLMs understand the graph structure in accordance with the intent of the prompt designers? Third, we investigate why LLMs can improve their performance after incorporating structural information. Our exploration of these questions reveals that (i) there is no substantial evidence that the performance of LLMs is significantly attributed to data leakage; (ii) instead of understanding prompts as graph structures as intended by the prompt designers, LLMs tend to process prompts more as contextual paragraphs and (iii) the most efficient elements of the local neighborhood included in the prompt are phrases that are pertinent to the node label, rather than the graph structure.

Read more

6/18/2024