Rethinking Information Structures in RLHF: Reward Generalization from a Graph Theory Perspective
0
🏷️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses a trilemma in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF): the incompatibility between highly diverse contexts, low labeling cost, and reliable alignment performance.
- To mitigate this incompatibility, the authors design dataset information structures during reward modeling and introduce the Induced Bayesian Network (IBN), a new theory of reward generalization capable of generating substantial verified predictions on large language models (LLMs).
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles a challenge in a type of machine learning called reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). RLHF is used to train AI systems, like large language models, to behave in ways that align with human preferences. However, the authors identify a trilemma - a trade-off between three desirable properties:
- Highly diverse contexts: The AI system needs to work well in a wide range of situations.
- Low labeling cost: It should be cheap and easy for humans to provide feedback to train the system.
- Reliable alignment performance: The final AI system should reliably behave in ways that match human preferences.
The authors propose a solution to this trilemma by designing the dataset information structure during the reward modeling stage of RLHF. Specifically, they introduce a new theoretical framework called the Induced Bayesian Network (IBN), which analyzes how the structure of the training data affects the generalization performance of the reward model.
Their key insight is that using a tree-based information structure for the training data, rather than a chain-based structure used in conventional RLHF methods, can lead to significantly better alignment performance without requiring any other changes. This suggests that the design of the dataset structure is a powerful lever for addressing the RLHF trilemma.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reexamines the RLHF process and proposes a theoretical framework that portrays it as an autoencoding process over text distributions. This framework formalizes the RLHF objective of ensuring distributional consistency between human preference and LLM behavior.
Based on this framework, the authors introduce the Induced Bayesian Network (IBN) to analyze generalization in the reward modeling stage of RLHF. Drawing from random graph theory and causal analysis, IBN enables the derivation of empirically-grounded generalization error bounds, which is a key improvement over classical theories of generalization.
A key insight from the IBN analysis is the superiority of the tree-based information structure in reward modeling, compared to the chain-based baselines used in conventional RLHF methods. The authors derive that in complex contexts with limited data, the tree-based reward model (RM) can induce up to Θ(log n/loglog n) times less variance than the baseline, where n is the dataset size.
To validate this finding, the authors demonstrate that on three NLP tasks, the tree-based RM achieves a 65% win rate on average against the chain-based baselines. This shows that alignment performance can be gained for free via the design of the dataset information structure, without the need for any other changes.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and insightful approach to addressing the RLHF trilemma by focusing on the design of the dataset information structure during reward modeling. The authors' theoretical framework and the introduction of the Induced Bayesian Network (IBN) are significant contributions that provide a more rigorous understanding of how the structure of the training data affects the generalization performance of the reward model.
One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses primarily on the reward modeling stage of RLHF and does not explicitly address other components of the RLHF process, such as the optimization of the language model or the interaction between the reward model and the language model. It would be interesting to see how the insights from the IBN analysis could be extended to these other aspects of RLHF.
Additionally, while the authors demonstrate the superiority of the tree-based information structure on three NLP tasks, it would be valuable to explore the performance of this approach on a wider range of tasks and datasets. This could help establish the broader applicability and robustness of the proposed solution.
Finally, the authors do not delve into the practical challenges of implementing the tree-based information structure in real-world RLHF systems. Exploring the scalability, computational efficiency, and data collection/curation requirements of this approach would be important for assessing its feasibility and adoption in industry settings.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel solution to the RLHF trilemma by focusing on the design of the dataset information structure during reward modeling. The authors' introduction of the Induced Bayesian Network (IBN) and their derivation of the superiority of the tree-based information structure over chain-based baselines are significant contributions to the field of RLHF.
The findings of this research suggest that the structure of the training data is a powerful lever for addressing the challenges of RLHF, and that alignment performance can be improved without the need for other changes to the system. This has important implications for the development of more reliable and robust AI systems that align with human preferences.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏷️
0
Rethinking Information Structures in RLHF: Reward Generalization from a Graph Theory Perspective
Tianyi Qiu, Fanzhi Zeng, Jiaming Ji, Dong Yan, Kaile Wang, Jiayi Zhou, Yang Han, Josef Dai, Xuehai Pan, Yaodong Yang
Existing alignment methods share a common topology of information flow, where reward information is collected from humans, modeled with preference learning, and used to tune language models. However, this shared topology has not been systematically characterized, nor have its alternatives been thoroughly explored, leaving the problems of low data efficiency and unreliable generalization unaddressed. As a solution, we introduce a theoretical framework for investigating reward generalization in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), focusing on the topology of information flow at both macro and micro levels. At the macro level, we portray the RLHF information flow as an autoencoding process over behavior distributions, formalizing the RLHF objective of distributional consistency between human preference and model behavior. At the micro level, we present induced Bayesian networks as a theory of reward generalization in RLHF, introducing fine-grained dataset topologies into generalization bounds. Combining analysis on both levels, we propose reward modeling from tree-structured preference information. It is shown to reduce reward uncertainty by up to $Theta(log n/loglog n)$ times compared to baselines, where $n$ is the dataset size. Validation on three NLP tasks shows that our tree-based reward model achieves an average win rate of 65% against baseline methods, thus improving reward generalization for free via topology design.
Read more6/18/2024
🐍
0
InfoRM: Mitigating Reward Hacking in RLHF via Information-Theoretic Reward Modeling
Yuchun Miao, Sen Zhang, Liang Ding, Rong Bao, Lefei Zhang, Dacheng Tao
Despite the success of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) in aligning language models with human values, reward hacking, also termed reward overoptimization, remains a critical challenge. This issue primarily arises from reward misgeneralization, where reward models (RMs) compute reward using spurious features that are irrelevant to human preferences. In this work, we tackle this problem from an information-theoretic perspective and propose a framework for reward modeling, namely InfoRM, by introducing a variational information bottleneck objective to filter out irrelevant information. Notably, we further identify a correlation between overoptimization and outliers in the IB latent space of InfoRM, establishing it as a promising tool for detecting reward overoptimization. Inspired by this finding, we propose the Cluster Separation Index (CSI), which quantifies deviations in the IB latent space, as an indicator of reward overoptimization to facilitate the development of online mitigation strategies. Extensive experiments on a wide range of settings and RM scales (70M, 440M, 1.4B, and 7B) demonstrate the effectiveness of InfoRM. Further analyses reveal that InfoRM's overoptimization detection mechanism is not only effective but also robust across a broad range of datasets, signifying a notable advancement in the field of RLHF. The code will be released upon acceptance.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Reward-Robust RLHF in LLMs
Yuzi Yan, Xingzhou Lou, Jialian Li, Yiping Zhang, Jian Xie, Chao Yu, Yu Wang, Dong Yan, Yuan Shen
As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to progress toward more advanced forms of intelligence, Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is increasingly seen as a key pathway toward achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). However, the reliance on reward-model-based (RM-based) alignment methods introduces significant challenges due to the inherent instability and imperfections of Reward Models (RMs), which can lead to critical issues such as reward hacking and misalignment with human intentions. In this paper, we introduce a reward-robust RLHF framework aimed at addressing these fundamental challenges, paving the way for more reliable and resilient learning in LLMs. Our approach introduces a novel optimization objective that carefully balances performance and robustness by incorporating Bayesian Reward Model Ensembles (BRME) to model the uncertainty set of reward functions. This allows the framework to integrate both nominal performance and minimum reward signals, ensuring more stable learning even with imperfect RMs. Empirical results demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms baselines across diverse benchmarks, showing improved accuracy and long-term stability. We also provide a theoretical analysis, demonstrating that reward-robust RLHF approaches the stability of constant reward settings, which proves to be acceptable even in a stochastic-case analysis. Together, these contributions highlight the framework potential to enhance both the performance and stability of LLM alignment.
Read more9/30/2024
🏅
0
Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference Model
Chenlu Ye, Wei Xiong, Yuheng Zhang, Nan Jiang, Tong Zhang
We study Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) under a general preference oracle. In particular, we do not assume that there exists a reward function and the preference signal is drawn from the Bradley-Terry model as most of the prior works do. We consider a standard mathematical formulation, the reverse-KL regularized minimax game between two LLMs for RLHF under general preference oracle. The learning objective of this formulation is to find a policy so that it is consistently preferred by the KL-regularized preference oracle over any competing LLMs. We show that this framework is strictly more general than the reward-based one, and propose sample-efficient algorithms for both the offline learning from a pre-collected preference dataset and online learning where we can query the preference oracle along the way of training. Empirical studies verify the effectiveness of the proposed framework.
Read more4/26/2024