REX: Designing User-centered Repair and Explanations to Address Robot Failures
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the design of user-centered repair and explanation systems to address failures in industrial robots.
- The researchers conducted a vignette study to understand how people respond to different types of robot failures and the explanations provided.
- They used the insights from this study to develop a prototype system called REX (Repair and Explanation) that aims to improve the user experience when robots fail.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the challenge of designing systems that can effectively handle robot failures and provide users with helpful explanations. When industrial robots malfunction or make mistakes, it can be frustrating and confusing for the people working with them. The researchers behind this study recognized the need for better ways to repair robots and help users understand what went wrong.
To better understand this problem, the researchers conducted a "vignette study." This involved showing people different scenarios where a robot failed, and then asking them how they would respond and what kind of explanation they would find most useful. Based on the insights from this study, the researchers developed a prototype system called REX (Repair and Explanation) that aims to provide users with more effective support when robots encounter problems.
The core idea behind REX is to give users more control and understanding over the repair process. Rather than just telling users that something is broken, REX would guide them through the steps needed to fix the issue. It would also provide clear explanations of what went wrong and why, so users feel more informed and empowered.
By focusing on the user experience and making the repair process more transparent, the researchers hope that REX can help build trust and cooperation between humans and industrial robots, even when things don't go as planned.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a vignette study to understand how people respond to different types of robot failures and the explanations provided. They presented participants with various scenarios where a robot encountered an issue, such as dropping an object or getting stuck. Participants were then asked to describe how they would react, what kind of explanation they would find most helpful, and how their trust in the robot would be affected.
Based on the findings from this study, the researchers developed a prototype system called REX (Repair and Explanation) that aims to provide users with more effective support when robots encounter problems. The key features of REX include:
- Guided Repair Process: REX guides the user through the steps needed to diagnose and fix the robot's issue, rather than just reporting that something is broken.
- Transparent Explanations: REX provides clear and detailed explanations of what went wrong, why it happened, and what actions are required to resolve the problem. This aligns with research on the importance of interpretable robot behavior.
- User Control: REX gives users more control over the repair process, allowing them to pause, resume, or retry steps as needed.
The researchers argue that by focusing on the user experience and making the repair process more transparent, REX can help build trust and cooperation between humans and industrial robots, even when things don't go as planned. This addresses a key challenge in human-AI interaction - the need for effective explanations to maintain trust.
Critical Analysis
The researchers provide a well-designed vignette study that offers valuable insights into how people respond to robot failures and the types of explanations they find most useful. By developing the REX prototype based on these findings, the researchers have taken an important step towards creating more user-centered repair and explanation systems for industrial robots.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research. For example, the vignette study used hypothetical scenarios, which may not fully capture how people would react in real-world situations. It would be interesting to see how the REX system performs in actual industrial settings and whether users find it effective in practice.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the technical challenges involved in implementing a system like REX, such as the complexity of diagnosing and explaining a wide range of robot failures. Further research may be needed to understand the feasibility and scalability of this approach in complex, real-world industrial environments.
Conclusion
Overall, this paper presents a promising approach to addressing the challenges of robot failures in industrial settings. By focusing on the user experience and providing more transparent and user-friendly repair and explanation systems, the researchers aim to build trust and cooperation between humans and industrial robots. The insights from the vignette study and the REX prototype offer a valuable foundation for further research and development in this important area of human-robot interaction.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
REX: Designing User-centered Repair and Explanations to Address Robot Failures
Christine P Lee, Pragathi Praveena, Bilge Mutlu
Robots in real-world environments continuously engage with multiple users and encounter changes that lead to unexpected conflicts in fulfilling user requests. Recent technical advancements (e.g., large-language models (LLMs), program synthesis) offer various methods for automatically generating repair plans that address such conflicts. In this work, we understand how automated repair and explanations can be designed to improve user experience with robot failures through two user studies. In our first, online study ($n=162$), users expressed increased trust, satisfaction, and utility with the robot performing automated repair and explanations. However, we also identified risk factors -- safety, privacy, and complexity -- that require adaptive repair strategies. The second, in-person study ($n=24$) elucidated distinct repair and explanation strategies depending on the level of risk severity and type. Using a design-based approach, we explore automated repair with explanations as a solution for robots to handle conflicts and failures, complemented by adaptive strategies for risk factors. Finally, we discuss the implications of incorporating such strategies into robot designs to achieve seamless operation among changing user needs and environments.
Read more5/28/2024
🛠️
0
Human-AI Interaction in Industrial Robotics: Design and Empirical Evaluation of a User Interface for Explainable AI-Based Robot Program Optimization
Benjamin Alt, Johannes Zahn, Claudius Kienle, Julia Dvorak, Marvin May, Darko Katic, Rainer Jakel, Tobias Kopp, Michael Beetz, Gisela Lanza
While recent advances in deep learning have demonstrated its transformative potential, its adoption for real-world manufacturing applications remains limited. We present an Explanation User Interface (XUI) for a state-of-the-art deep learning-based robot program optimizer which provides both naive and expert users with different user experiences depending on their skill level, as well as Explainable AI (XAI) features to facilitate the application of deep learning methods in real-world applications. To evaluate the impact of the XUI on task performance, user satisfaction and cognitive load, we present the results of a preliminary user survey and propose a study design for a large-scale follow-up study.
Read more5/1/2024
📊
0
Multi-Agent Strategy Explanations for Human-Robot Collaboration
Ravi Pandya, Michelle Zhao, Changliu Liu, Reid Simmons, Henny Admoni
As robots are deployed in human spaces, it is important that they are able to coordinate their actions with the people around them. Part of such coordination involves ensuring that people have a good understanding of how a robot will act in the environment. This can be achieved through explanations of the robot's policy. Much prior work in explainable AI and RL focuses on generating explanations for single-agent policies, but little has been explored in generating explanations for collaborative policies. In this work, we investigate how to generate multi-agent strategy explanations for human-robot collaboration. We formulate the problem using a generic multi-agent planner, show how to generate visual explanations through strategy-conditioned landmark states and generate textual explanations by giving the landmarks to an LLM. Through a user study, we find that when presented with explanations from our proposed framework, users are able to better explore the full space of strategies and collaborate more efficiently with new robot partners.
Read more7/2/2024
0
Human Reactions to Incorrect Answers from Robots
Ponkoj Chandra Shill, Md. Azizul Hakim, Muhammad Jahanzeb Khan, Bashira Akter Anima
As robots grow more and more integrated into numerous industries, it is critical to comprehend how humans respond to their failures. This paper systematically studies how trust dynamics and system design are affected by human responses to robot failures. The three-stage survey used in the study provides a thorough understanding of human-robot interactions. While the second stage concentrates on interaction details, such as robot precision and error acknowledgment, the first stage collects demographic data and initial levels of trust. In the last phase, participants' perceptions are examined after the encounter, and trust dynamics, forgiveness, and propensity to suggest robotic technologies are evaluated. Results show that participants' trust in robotic technologies increased significantly when robots acknowledged their errors or limitations to participants and their willingness to suggest robots for activities in the future points to a favorable change in perception, emphasizing the role that direct engagement has in influencing trust dynamics. By providing useful advice for creating more sympathetic, responsive, and reliable robotic systems, the study advances the science of human-robot interaction and promotes a wider adoption of robotic technologies.
Read more7/8/2024