Multi-Agent Strategy Explanations for Human-Robot Collaboration

Read original: arXiv:2311.11955 - Published 7/2/2024 by Ravi Pandya, Michelle Zhao, Changliu Liu, Reid Simmons, Henny Admoni

📊

Overview

As robots become more prevalent in human environments, it is important that they can coordinate their actions with people around them.
A key aspect of this coordination is ensuring that people have a good understanding of how the robot will behave.
Prior work in explainable AI has focused on explaining single-agent policies, but little has been done for collaborative policies.
This paper investigates generating multi-agent strategy explanations to enable more effective human-robot collaboration.

Plain English Explanation

When robots start working alongside humans in shared spaces, it's important that the humans can understand how the robots will act and behave. This helps the humans and robots work together effectively.

Previous research has looked at ways to explain the behavior of individual robots, but not much work has been done on explaining the strategies of multiple robots working together.

This paper explores methods for generating explanations of the collaborative strategies used by groups of robots. The key idea is to use the robot's planned actions and "landmark" states to create visual and textual descriptions of the overall strategy.

By providing these explanations to human partners, the researchers found that people were better able to understand the full range of possible robot strategies and collaborate more efficiently with new robot teams. This suggests that generating clear strategy explanations can be an important part of enabling smooth human-robot collaboration.

Technical Explanation

The paper formulates the problem of generating multi-agent strategy explanations using a generic multi-agent planner. To create the explanations, the approach identifies key "landmark" states in the robots' planned actions and uses these to generate both visual and textual descriptions.

The visual explanations highlight the landmark states and how they relate to the overall strategy. The textual explanations use a large language model (LLM) to describe the significance of these landmark states and how they fit into the collaborative plan.

Through a user study, the researchers found that when presented with these multi-agent strategy explanations, people were better able to understand the range of possible robot behaviors and collaborate more effectively with new robot partners. This suggests the proposed framework can be an effective way to enhance robot explanation capabilities and enable more human-machine teaming.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for generating multi-agent strategy explanations, but there are some potential limitations to consider:

The study only evaluated the explanations in a simulated environment, so further research would be needed to see how well the framework works in real-world human-robot collaboration scenarios.
The textual explanations rely on an LLM, which can sometimes produce biased or inconsistent outputs. More work may be needed to ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of the language-based explanations.
The paper does not discuss how the framework could be extended to handle more complex multi-agent coordination strategies or unexpected situations that may arise during real-world interactions.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in designing user-centered repair explanations to support effective human-robot collaboration. Further development and testing will be needed to fully realize the potential of this approach.

Conclusion

This paper explores a novel framework for generating multi-agent strategy explanations to enable more effective human-robot collaboration. By identifying key landmark states in the robots' planned actions and using them to create visual and textual descriptions, the approach helps humans better understand the range of possible robot behaviors and work more efficiently with new robot partners.

While the research is still in the early stages, the findings suggest that providing clear explanations of collaborative robot strategies could be an important component of enabling smooth and productive human-machine teaming in shared environments. As robots become more prevalent, this type of explanation-based approach may prove crucial for building trust and facilitating effective cooperation between people and robots.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📊

Multi-Agent Strategy Explanations for Human-Robot Collaboration

Ravi Pandya, Michelle Zhao, Changliu Liu, Reid Simmons, Henny Admoni

As robots are deployed in human spaces, it is important that they are able to coordinate their actions with the people around them. Part of such coordination involves ensuring that people have a good understanding of how a robot will act in the environment. This can be achieved through explanations of the robot's policy. Much prior work in explainable AI and RL focuses on generating explanations for single-agent policies, but little has been explored in generating explanations for collaborative policies. In this work, we investigate how to generate multi-agent strategy explanations for human-robot collaboration. We formulate the problem using a generic multi-agent planner, show how to generate visual explanations through strategy-conditioned landmark states and generate textual explanations by giving the landmarks to an LLM. Through a user study, we find that when presented with explanations from our proposed framework, users are able to better explore the full space of strategies and collaborate more efficiently with new robot partners.

7/2/2024

Designs for Enabling Collaboration in Human-Machine Teaming via Interactive and Explainable Systems

Rohan Paleja, Michael Munje, Kimberlee Chang, Reed Jensen, Matthew Gombolay

Collaborative robots and machine learning-based virtual agents are increasingly entering the human workspace with the aim of increasing productivity and enhancing safety. Despite this, we show in a ubiquitous experimental domain, Overcooked-AI, that state-of-the-art techniques for human-machine teaming (HMT), which rely on imitation or reinforcement learning, are brittle and result in a machine agent that aims to decouple the machine and human's actions to act independently rather than in a synergistic fashion. To remedy this deficiency, we develop HMT approaches that enable iterative, mixed-initiative team development allowing end-users to interactively reprogram interpretable AI teammates. Our 50-subject study provides several findings that we summarize into guidelines. While all approaches underperform a simple collaborative heuristic (a critical, negative result for learning-based methods), we find that white-box approaches supported by interactive modification can lead to significant team development, outperforming white-box approaches alone, and black-box approaches are easier to train and result in better HMT performance highlighting a tradeoff between explainability and interactivity versus ease-of-training. Together, these findings present three important directions: 1) Improving the ability to generate collaborative agents with white-box models, 2) Better learning methods to facilitate collaboration rather than individualized coordination, and 3) Mixed-initiative interfaces that enable users, who may vary in ability, to improve collaboration.

6/10/2024

📶

Explaining Decisions of Agents in Mixed-Motive Games

Maayan Orner, Oleg Maksimov, Akiva Kleinerman, Charles Ortiz, Sarit Kraus

In recent years, agents have become capable of communicating seamlessly via natural language and navigating in environments that involve cooperation and competition, a fact that can introduce social dilemmas. Due to the interleaving of cooperation and competition, understanding agents' decision-making in such environments is challenging, and humans can benefit from obtaining explanations. However, such environments and scenarios have rarely been explored in the context of explainable AI. While some explanation methods for cooperative environments can be applied in mixed-motive setups, they do not address inter-agent competition, cheap-talk, or implicit communication by actions. In this work, we design explanation methods to address these issues. Then, we proceed to demonstrate their effectiveness and usefulness for humans, using a non-trivial mixed-motive game as a test case. Lastly, we establish generality and demonstrate the applicability of the methods to other games, including one where we mimic human game actions using large language models.

7/23/2024

Explainable Human-AI Interaction: A Planning Perspective

Sarath Sreedharan, Anagha Kulkarni, Subbarao Kambhampati

From its inception, AI has had a rather ambivalent relationship with humans -- swinging between their augmentation and replacement. Now, as AI technologies enter our everyday lives at an ever increasing pace, there is a greater need for AI systems to work synergistically with humans. One critical requirement for such synergistic human-AI interaction is that the AI systems be explainable to the humans in the loop. To do this effectively, AI agents need to go beyond planning with their own models of the world, and take into account the mental model of the human in the loop. Drawing from several years of research in our lab, we will discuss how the AI agent can use these mental models to either conform to human expectations, or change those expectations through explanatory communication. While the main focus of the book is on cooperative scenarios, we will point out how the same mental models can be used for obfuscation and deception. Although the book is primarily driven by our own research in these areas, in every chapter, we will provide ample connections to relevant research from other groups.

5/28/2024