Robots that Learn to Safely Influence via Prediction-Informed Reach-Avoid Dynamic Games
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a framework for robots to learn how to safely influence human behavior through prediction-informed reach-avoid dynamic games.
- The goal is to enable robots to suggest safe alternatives and guide humans towards desirable actions, while avoiding harm or disruption.
- The approach involves modeling the interaction between robots and humans as a dynamic game, where the robot predicts the human's behavior and takes actions to steer them towards safe outcomes.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a way for robots to learn how to influence human behavior in a safe and helpful manner. The key idea is to model the interaction between the robot and the human as a "dynamic game" - this means the robot tries to predict what the human will do, and then takes actions to guide the human towards safer and more desirable choices, without causing harm or disruption.
For example, imagine a robot assistant working alongside a human in a factory. The robot could monitor the human's actions and predict when they might do something unsafe, like reaching for a heavy object in an awkward way. The robot would then suggest a safer alternative, like using a lifting aid, to steer the human away from the risky behavior.
The robot achieves this by continuously updating its understanding of the human's preferences and capabilities, and using that information to make strategic moves within the "game" to influence the human's actions. This allows the robot to provide helpful guidance while respecting the human's autonomy and avoiding any negative impact.
The researchers believe this approach could be very valuable in a wide range of human-robot collaboration scenarios, from manufacturing to healthcare to everyday assistive tasks. By learning to safely influence behavior, robots can become more effective partners and help keep humans out of harm's way.
Technical Explanation
The core of this framework is modeling the interaction between robots and humans as a prediction-informed reach-avoid dynamic game. The robot constantly updates its understanding of the human's preferences, capabilities, and likely future actions through a predictive model. It then uses this information to select strategic actions that will "steer" the human towards safer and more desirable behaviors.
This is achieved by formulating the interaction as a differential game, where the robot and human have competing objectives but must also account for each other's actions. The robot's goal is to "guide" the human away from hazardous regions and towards safer alternatives, while the human aims to accomplish their own task.
By continuously updating its predictive model of the human, the robot can anticipate dangerous situations and "proactively intervene" to suggest safer alternatives or nudge the human in a more desirable direction. This allows the robot to influence the human's behavior without overriding their autonomy or causing disruption.
The researchers evaluate this approach through simulations and user studies, demonstrating its ability to "learn safe influence strategies" that improve human safety and task performance compared to a non-interactive baseline.
Critical Analysis
The researchers have presented a well-designed framework that addresses an important challenge in human-robot interaction - enabling robots to guide and influence human behavior in a safe and helpful manner. By modeling the interaction as a dynamic game and continuously updating the robot's predictive capabilities, the approach shows promise for a wide range of collaborative scenarios.
However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research that could be considered:
-
The current formulation assumes the human's objectives are known or can be accurately inferred by the robot. In more complex real-world situations, the human's goals may be less clear, requiring more advanced modeling and inference techniques.
-
The evaluation focused on simulated environments and relatively simple user studies. Further testing in more realistic, high-stakes settings would be valuable to assess the approach's scalability and robustness.
-
The ethical implications of a robot proactively influencing human behavior, even with the intent of improving safety, merit deeper consideration. Maintaining human autonomy and agency should be a paramount concern.
Overall, this research represents an important step towards developing robots that can safely and effectively collaborate with humans. By continuing to refine the technical approach and carefully considering the ethical challenges, the researchers could unlock valuable applications in manufacturing, healthcare, and beyond.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel framework that enables robots to learn how to safely influence human behavior through prediction-informed reach-avoid dynamic games. By modeling the interaction as a strategic game and continuously updating its understanding of the human, the robot can anticipate dangerous situations and guide the human towards safer alternatives without disrupting their autonomy.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through simulations and user studies, showing improvements in human safety and task performance. While there are some potential limitations and ethical considerations to address, this work represents a significant advancement in the field of human-robot interaction, paving the way for more seamless and beneficial collaborations between humans and machines.
As robots become increasingly integrated into our daily lives and work environments, the ability to safely influence human behavior will be crucial. This research provides a promising blueprint for developing a new generation of robot assistants that can proactively look out for our wellbeing while respecting our agency and decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
New!Robots that Learn to Safely Influence via Prediction-Informed Reach-Avoid Dynamic Games
Ravi Pandya, Changliu Liu, Andrea Bajcsy
Robots can influence people to accomplish their tasks more efficiently: autonomous cars can inch forward at an intersection to pass through, and tabletop manipulators can go for an object on the table first. However, a robot's ability to influence can also compromise the safety of nearby people if naively executed. In this work, we pose and solve a novel robust reach-avoid dynamic game which enables robots to be maximally influential, but only when a safety backup control exists. On the human side, we model the human's behavior as goal-driven but conditioned on the robot's plan, enabling us to capture influence. On the robot side, we solve the dynamic game in the joint physical and belief space, enabling the robot to reason about how its uncertainty in human behavior will evolve over time. We instantiate our method, called SLIDE (Safely Leveraging Influence in Dynamic Environments), in a high-dimensional (39-D) simulated human-robot collaborative manipulation task solved via offline game-theoretic reinforcement learning. We compare our approach to a robust baseline that treats the human as a worst-case adversary, a safety controller that does not explicitly reason about influence, and an energy-function-based safety shield. We find that SLIDE consistently enables the robot to leverage the influence it has on the human when it is safe to do so, ultimately allowing the robot to be less conservative while still ensuring a high safety rate during task execution.
Read more9/19/2024
0
Robots that Suggest Safe Alternatives
Hyun Joe Jeong, Andrea Bajcsy
Goal-conditioned policies, such as those learned via imitation learning, provide an easy way for humans to influence what tasks robots accomplish. However, these robot policies are not guaranteed to execute safely or to succeed when faced with out-of-distribution requests. In this work, we enable robots to know when they can confidently execute a user's desired goal, and automatically suggest safe alternatives when they cannot. Our approach is inspired by control-theoretic safety filtering, wherein a safety filter minimally adjusts a robot's candidate action to be safe. Our key idea is to pose alternative suggestion as a safe control problem in goal space, rather than in action space. Offline, we use reachability analysis to compute a goal-parameterized reach-avoid value network which quantifies the safety and liveness of the robot's pre-trained policy. Online, our robot uses the reach-avoid value network as a safety filter, monitoring the human's given goal and actively suggesting alternatives that are similar but meet the safety specification. We demonstrate our Safe ALTernatives (SALT) framework in simulation experiments with indoor navigation and Franka Panda tabletop manipulation, and with both discrete and continuous goal representations. We find that SALT is able to learn to predict successful and failed closed-loop executions, is a less pessimistic monitor than open-loop uncertainty quantification, and proposes alternatives that consistently align with those people find acceptable.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Gameplay Filters: Safe Robot Walking through Adversarial Imagination
Duy P. Nguyen, Kai-Chieh Hsu, Wenhao Yu, Jie Tan, Jaime F. Fisac
Despite the impressive recent advances in learning-based robot control, ensuring robustness to out-of-distribution conditions remains an open challenge. Safety filters can, in principle, keep arbitrary control policies from incurring catastrophic failures by overriding unsafe actions, but existing solutions for complex (e.g., legged) robot dynamics do not span the full motion envelope and instead rely on local, reduced-order models. These filters tend to overly restrict agility and can still fail when perturbed away from nominal conditions. This paper presents the gameplay filter, a new class of predictive safety filter that continually plays out hypothetical matches between its simulation-trained safety strategy and a virtual adversary co-trained to invoke worst-case events and sim-to-real error, and precludes actions that would cause it to fail down the line. We demonstrate the scalability and robustness of the approach with a first-of-its-kind full-order safety filter for (36-D) quadrupedal dynamics. Physical experiments on two different quadruped platforms demonstrate the superior zero-shot effectiveness of the gameplay filter under large perturbations such as tugging and unmodeled terrain.
Read more8/30/2024
🔮
0
Towards Proactive Safe Human-Robot Collaborations via Data-Efficient Conditional Behavior Prediction
Ravi Pandya, Zhuoyuan Wang, Yorie Nakahira, Changliu Liu
We focus on the problem of how we can enable a robot to collaborate seamlessly with a human partner, specifically in scenarios where preexisting data is sparse. Much prior work in human-robot collaboration uses observational models of humans (i.e. models that treat the robot purely as an observer) to choose the robot's behavior, but such models do not account for the influence the robot has on the human's actions, which may lead to inefficient interactions. We instead formulate the problem of optimally choosing a collaborative robot's behavior based on a conditional model of the human that depends on the robot's future behavior. First, we propose a novel model-based formulation of conditional behavior prediction that allows the robot to infer the human's intentions based on its future plan in data-sparse environments. We then show how to utilize a conditional model for proactive goal selection and safe trajectory generation around human collaborators. Finally, we use our proposed proactive controller in a collaborative task with real users to show that it can improve users' interactions with a robot collaborator quantitatively and qualitatively.
Read more7/2/2024