Robust Claim Verification Through Fact Detection
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a method for robust claim verification through fact detection.
- It aims to improve the accuracy and reliability of claim verification by identifying relevant facts from diverse sources.
- The proposed approach combines natural language processing techniques with knowledge graph reasoning to verify claims.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a system for verifying claims by detecting relevant facts from various sources. The key idea is to go beyond simply matching claims against a single knowledge base. Instead, the system uses advanced natural language processing to understand the claim, then searches across multiple information sources to find supporting or contradictory facts.
By combining evidence from different sources, the system can more reliably determine whether a claim is true or false. This is important for combating the spread of misinformation online, where claims may be partially true or missing key context.
The annotation and detection of factual claims is a critical first step in this process. By accurately identifying the key facts being asserted, the system can then search for supporting or contradictory evidence from reliable sources.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a two-stage process for robust claim verification. First, it uses natural language processing to extract the factual claims made in a given text. This involves identifying the key entities, relations, and numeric values that constitute the claim.
Next, the system retrieves relevant evidence from a large knowledge graph, which aggregates information from various web sources. It does this by mapping the extracted facts to corresponding nodes and edges in the knowledge graph, then reasoning over the surrounding context to find supporting or contradictory information.
The final claim verification module then combines the extracted facts and retrieved evidence to produce a confidence score for whether the original claim is true or false. This allows the system to provide a nuanced assessment, rather than a binary true/false output.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges several limitations of the proposed approach. For example, the knowledge graph may not cover all relevant facts, and the natural language processing components can introduce errors in claim extraction. Additionally, the system may struggle with claims that require complex reasoning or rely on subjective judgments.
Further research could explore ways to expand the knowledge base, incorporate multimodal evidence, and develop more advanced reasoning techniques to overcome these limitations.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to robust claim verification that leverages natural language processing and knowledge graph reasoning. By extracting factual claims and retrieving supporting evidence from diverse sources, the system can provide more reliable and nuanced assessments of claim truthfulness.
While the method has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the fight against online misinformation. As the scale and complexity of false claims continue to grow, techniques like this will be crucial for empowering users to critically evaluate the information they encounter.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Robust Claim Verification Through Fact Detection
Nazanin Jafari, James Allan
Claim verification can be a challenging task. In this paper, we present a method to enhance the robustness and reasoning capabilities of automated claim verification through the extraction of short facts from evidence. Our novel approach, FactDetect, leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate concise factual statements from evidence and label these facts based on their semantic relevance to the claim and evidence. The generated facts are then combined with the claim and evidence. To train a lightweight supervised model, we incorporate a fact-detection task into the claim verification process as a multitasking approach to improve both performance and explainability. We also show that augmenting FactDetect in the claim verification prompt enhances performance in zero-shot claim verification using LLMs. Our method demonstrates competitive results in the supervised claim verification model by 15% on the F1 score when evaluated for challenging scientific claim verification datasets. We also demonstrate that FactDetect can be augmented with claim and evidence for zero-shot prompting (AugFactDetect) in LLMs for verdict prediction. We show that AugFactDetect outperforms the baseline with statistical significance on three challenging scientific claim verification datasets with an average of 17.3% performance gain compared to the best performing baselines.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Claim Verification in the Age of Large Language Models: A Survey
Alphaeus Dmonte, Roland Oruche, Marcos Zampieri, Prasad Calyam, Isabelle Augenstein
The large and ever-increasing amount of data available on the Internet coupled with the laborious task of manual claim and fact verification has sparked the interest in the development of automated claim verification systems. Several deep learning and transformer-based models have been proposed for this task over the years. With the introduction of Large Language Models (LLMs) and their superior performance in several NLP tasks, we have seen a surge of LLM-based approaches to claim verification along with the use of novel methods such as Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). In this survey, we present a comprehensive account of recent claim verification frameworks using LLMs. We describe the different components of the claim verification pipeline used in these frameworks in detail including common approaches to retrieval, prompting, and fine-tuning. Finally, we describe publicly available English datasets created for this task.
Read more8/27/2024
0
AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotators
Jingwei Ni, Minjing Shi, Dominik Stammbach, Mrinmaya Sachan, Elliott Ash, Markus Leippold
With the rise of generative AI, automated fact-checking methods to combat misinformation are becoming more and more important. However, factual claim detection, the first step in a fact-checking pipeline, suffers from two key issues that limit its scalability and generalizability: (1) inconsistency in definitions of the task and what a claim is, and (2) the high cost of manual annotation. To address (1), we review the definitions in related work and propose a unifying definition of factual claims that focuses on verifiability. To address (2), we introduce AFaCTA (Automatic Factual Claim deTection Annotator), a novel framework that assists in the annotation of factual claims with the help of large language models (LLMs). AFaCTA calibrates its annotation confidence with consistency along three predefined reasoning paths. Extensive evaluation and experiments in the domain of political speech reveal that AFaCTA can efficiently assist experts in annotating factual claims and training high-quality classifiers, and can work with or without expert supervision. Our analyses also result in PoliClaim, a comprehensive claim detection dataset spanning diverse political topics.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Large Language Model Agent for Fake News Detection
Xinyi Li, Yongfeng Zhang, Edward C. Malthouse
In the current digital era, the rapid spread of misinformation on online platforms presents significant challenges to societal well-being, public trust, and democratic processes, influencing critical decision making and public opinion. To address these challenges, there is a growing need for automated fake news detection mechanisms. Pre-trained large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities across various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, prompting exploration into their potential for verifying news claims. Instead of employing LLMs in a non-agentic way, where LLMs generate responses based on direct prompts in a single shot, our work introduces FactAgent, an agentic approach of utilizing LLMs for fake news detection. FactAgent enables LLMs to emulate human expert behavior in verifying news claims without any model training, following a structured workflow. This workflow breaks down the complex task of news veracity checking into multiple sub-steps, where LLMs complete simple tasks using their internal knowledge or external tools. At the final step of the workflow, LLMs integrate all findings throughout the workflow to determine the news claim's veracity. Compared to manual human verification, FactAgent offers enhanced efficiency. Experimental studies demonstrate the effectiveness of FactAgent in verifying claims without the need for any training process. Moreover, FactAgent provides transparent explanations at each step of the workflow and during final decision-making, offering insights into the reasoning process of fake news detection for end users. FactAgent is highly adaptable, allowing for straightforward updates to its tools that LLMs can leverage within the workflow, as well as updates to the workflow itself using domain knowledge. This adaptability enables FactAgent's application to news verification across various domains.
Read more5/6/2024