The Role of Inherent Bellman Error in Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation

Read original: arXiv:2406.11686 - Published 6/19/2024 by Noah Golowich, Ankur Moitra
Total Score

0

🏅

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines the role of inherent Bellman error in offline reinforcement learning (RL) with linear function approximation.
  • It explores how the quality of the learned policy in offline RL is affected by the inherent Bellman error, which arises from the mismatch between the true environment and the linear function approximation used to represent it.
  • The authors provide theoretical analysis and empirical results to understand the impact of inherent Bellman error on the performance of offline RL algorithms.

Plain English Explanation

In reinforcement learning (RL), an agent (such as a robot or software program) learns to make decisions by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or punishments. One challenging setting is offline RL, where the agent has to learn from a fixed dataset of past experiences, without the ability to actively explore the environment.

When using linear function approximation in offline RL, there can be a mismatch between the true environment and the linear model used to represent it. This mismatch leads to an inherent Bellman error, which is a type of error in the agent's understanding of the environment. The paper investigates how this inherent Bellman error affects the quality of the agent's learned policy (its decision-making strategy) in offline RL.

The authors provide theoretical analysis and empirical results to show that the inherent Bellman error can have a significant impact on the agent's performance. They find that in some cases, the inherent Bellman error can be the dominant factor limiting the agent's ability to learn an effective policy, even when the offline dataset is large.

This research is important because it helps us understand the challenges of using linear function approximation in offline RL and the factors that can influence the success of these algorithms. By better understanding the role of inherent Bellman error, researchers and practitioners can work to develop more robust and effective offline RL methods, which could have applications in areas like robotics, game AI, and decision-making systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores the role of inherent Bellman error in offline reinforcement learning (RL) with linear function approximation. Inherent Bellman error is a type of error that arises when the true environment cannot be perfectly represented by the linear function approximation used by the RL agent.

The authors provide a theoretical analysis to characterize the inherent Bellman error and its impact on the performance of offline RL algorithms. They show that the inherent Bellman error can be the dominant factor limiting the agent's ability to learn an effective policy, even when the offline dataset is large.

Specifically, the paper examines two key questions:

  1. How does the inherent Bellman error affect the quality of the learned policy in offline RL? The authors derive theoretical bounds on the performance of the learned policy as a function of the inherent Bellman error.

  2. What are the conditions under which the inherent Bellman error is the dominant factor limiting policy performance? The authors identify scenarios where the inherent Bellman error is the primary source of suboptimality, rather than the quality or size of the offline dataset.

The theoretical analysis is complemented by empirical results on synthetic and real-world datasets, which validate the key insights from the theory. The authors demonstrate that the inherent Bellman error can have a significant impact on the agent's performance, even when the offline dataset is large and the linear function approximation has good representation power.

This work builds on and extends previous research on linear Bellman completeness, computationally efficient RL under linear Bellman completeness, adversarial robust Q-learning, nonstationary RL with linear function approximation, and bridging the gap between MSE loss and optimality.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable theoretical and empirical analysis of the role of inherent Bellman error in offline RL with linear function approximation. The authors clearly identify the key research questions and present a rigorous analysis to address them.

One potential limitation of the work is that it focuses on the specific case of linear function approximation. While this is an important and widely studied setting, it would be interesting to see how the insights from this paper might extend to other function approximation schemes, such as neural networks or kernel methods.

Additionally, the paper does not explore potential mitigation strategies for the inherent Bellman error, such as using more expressive function approximators or incorporating additional domain knowledge into the model. Investigating these types of approaches could be a fruitful direction for future research.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of the challenges and limitations of offline RL, particularly in the context of linear function approximation. The insights provided can help guide the development of more robust and effective offline RL algorithms, which could have significant practical implications across a wide range of applications.

Conclusion

This paper investigates the role of inherent Bellman error in offline reinforcement learning with linear function approximation. The authors provide theoretical analysis and empirical results showing that the inherent Bellman error can be a dominant factor limiting the performance of learned policies, even when the offline dataset is large.

The key takeaways from this research are:

  1. Inherent Bellman error can significantly impact offline RL performance: The mismatch between the true environment and the linear function approximation used to represent it can lead to inherent Bellman error, which can be a major obstacle to learning effective policies.

  2. Inherent Bellman error can be the primary source of suboptimality: In some cases, the inherent Bellman error, rather than the quality or size of the offline dataset, is the dominant factor limiting policy performance.

  3. Understanding inherent Bellman error is crucial for developing robust offline RL methods: By better understanding the role of inherent Bellman error, researchers and practitioners can work to design more effective offline RL algorithms that are better able to overcome this challenge.

This research provides important insights that can inform the development of more robust and effective offline RL methods, with potential applications in areas like robotics, game AI, and decision-making systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏅

Total Score

0

The Role of Inherent Bellman Error in Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation

Noah Golowich, Ankur Moitra

In this paper, we study the offline RL problem with linear function approximation. Our main structural assumption is that the MDP has low inherent Bellman error, which stipulates that linear value functions have linear Bellman backups with respect to the greedy policy. This assumption is natural in that it is essentially the minimal assumption required for value iteration to succeed. We give a computationally efficient algorithm which succeeds under a single-policy coverage condition on the dataset, namely which outputs a policy whose value is at least that of any policy which is well-covered by the dataset. Even in the setting when the inherent Bellman error is 0 (termed linear Bellman completeness), our algorithm yields the first known guarantee under single-policy coverage. In the setting of positive inherent Bellman error ${varepsilon_{mathrm{BE}}} > 0$, we show that the suboptimality error of our algorithm scales with $sqrt{varepsilon_{mathrm{BE}}}$. Furthermore, we prove that the scaling of the suboptimality with $sqrt{varepsilon_{mathrm{BE}}}$ cannot be improved for any algorithm. Our lower bound stands in contrast to many other settings in reinforcement learning with misspecification, where one can typically obtain performance that degrades linearly with the misspecification error.

Read more

6/19/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Linear Bellman Completeness Suffices for Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Few Actions

Noah Golowich, Ankur Moitra

One of the most natural approaches to reinforcement learning (RL) with function approximation is value iteration, which inductively generates approximations to the optimal value function by solving a sequence of regression problems. To ensure the success of value iteration, it is typically assumed that Bellman completeness holds, which ensures that these regression problems are well-specified. We study the problem of learning an optimal policy under Bellman completeness in the online model of RL with linear function approximation. In the linear setting, while statistically efficient algorithms are known under Bellman completeness (e.g., Jiang et al. (2017); Zanette et al. (2020)), these algorithms all rely on the principle of global optimism which requires solving a nonconvex optimization problem. In particular, it has remained open as to whether computationally efficient algorithms exist. In this paper we give the first polynomial-time algorithm for RL under linear Bellman completeness when the number of actions is any constant.

Read more

6/19/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

A Generalized Projected Bellman Error for Off-policy Value Estimation in Reinforcement Learning

Andrew Patterson, Adam White, Martha White

Many reinforcement learning algorithms rely on value estimation, however, the most widely used algorithms -- namely temporal difference algorithms -- can diverge under both off-policy sampling and nonlinear function approximation. Many algorithms have been developed for off-policy value estimation based on the linear mean squared projected Bellman error (MSPBE) and are sound under linear function approximation. Extending these methods to the nonlinear case has been largely unsuccessful. Recently, several methods have been introduced that approximate a different objective -- the mean-squared Bellman error (MSBE) -- which naturally facilitate nonlinear approximation. In this work, we build on these insights and introduce a new generalized MSPBE that extends the linear MSPBE to the nonlinear setting. We show how this generalized objective unifies previous work and obtain new bounds for the value error of the solutions of the generalized objective. We derive an easy-to-use, but sound, algorithm to minimize the generalized objective, and show that it is more stable across runs, is less sensitive to hyperparameters, and performs favorably across four control domains with neural network function approximation.

Read more

8/2/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Provably Efficient Infinite-Horizon Average-Reward Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation

Woojin Chae, Dabeen Lee

This paper proposes a computationally tractable algorithm for learning infinite-horizon average-reward linear Markov decision processes (MDPs) and linear mixture MDPs under the Bellman optimality condition. While guaranteeing computational efficiency, our algorithm for linear MDPs achieves the best-known regret upper bound of $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(d^{3/2}mathrm{sp}(v^*)sqrt{T})$ over $T$ time steps where $mathrm{sp}(v^*)$ is the span of the optimal bias function $v^*$ and $d$ is the dimension of the feature mapping. For linear mixture MDPs, our algorithm attains a regret bound of $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(dcdotmathrm{sp}(v^*)sqrt{T})$. The algorithm applies novel techniques to control the covering number of the value function class and the span of optimistic estimators of the value function, which is of independent interest.

Read more

9/25/2024