Towards Optimal Adversarial Robust Q-learning with Bellman Infinity-error

Read original: arXiv:2402.02165 - Published 5/21/2024 by Haoran Li, Zicheng Zhang, Wang Luo, Congying Han, Yudong Hu, Tiande Guo, Shichen Liao
Total Score

0

🖼️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores establishing robust policies to counter attacks or disturbances affecting deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents.
  • It introduces a consistency assumption of policy (CAP) stating that optimal actions remain consistent with minor perturbations, supported by empirical and theoretical evidence.
  • The paper proves the existence of a deterministic and stationary optimal robust policy (ORP) that aligns with the Bellman optimal policy.
  • It highlights the necessity of the L^{infty}-norm when minimizing Bellman error to attain ORP, in contrast to prior DRL algorithms that target the Bellman optimal policy with L^{1}-norm.
  • The paper introduces a Consistent Adversarial Robust Deep Q-Network (CAR-DQN) that minimizes a surrogate of Bellman Infinity-error, and validates its practical effectiveness across various benchmarks.

Plain English Explanation

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents can be vulnerable to attacks or disturbances that can disrupt their performance. To address this, the paper explores establishing robust policies that can withstand these challenges.

The key idea is a "consistency assumption of policy" (CAP), which suggests that the optimal actions an agent should take remain consistent even with small changes to the environment. This is supported by both empirical evidence and theoretical analysis.

Building on CAP, the researchers prove that there exists an "optimal robust policy" (ORP) that is deterministic, stationary, and aligns with the mathematically optimal Bellman policy. Importantly, they show that to find this ORP, it is necessary to use the L^{infty}-norm when minimizing the Bellman error, rather than the L^{1}-norm used by previous DRL algorithms.

Motivated by this, the paper introduces a new algorithm called "Consistent Adversarial Robust Deep Q-Network" (CAR-DQN) that minimizes a proxy for the Bellman Infinity-error. The researchers demonstrate that CAR-DQN achieves top-tier performance across various benchmarks, validating the practical effectiveness of their approach and the soundness of the underlying theoretical analysis.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the challenge of establishing robust policies for deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents to counter potential attacks or disturbances. Recent studies have explored state-adversarial robustness and suggested the potential lack of an optimal robust policy (ORP), posing challenges in setting strict robustness constraints.

The researchers first introduce a consistency assumption of policy (CAP), which states that optimal actions in the Markov decision process remain consistent with minor perturbations. This assumption is supported by both empirical and theoretical evidence.

Building upon CAP, the paper crucially proves the existence of a deterministic and stationary ORP that aligns with the Bellman optimal policy. Furthermore, the researchers illustrate the necessity of the L^{infty}-norm when minimizing Bellman error to attain ORP, in contrast to prior DRL algorithms that targeted the Bellman optimal policy using the L^{1}-norm.

Motivated by these findings, the paper introduces a Consistent Adversarial Robust Deep Q-Network (CAR-DQN) that minimizes a surrogate of Bellman Infinity-error. The researchers demonstrate the top-tier performance of CAR-DQN across various benchmarks, validating its practical effectiveness and reinforcing the soundness of their theoretical analysis.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical and empirical investigation into establishing robust policies for DRL agents. The introduction of the CAP assumption and the proof of the existence of a deterministic and stationary ORP are significant contributions, as they address a key challenge in setting strict robustness constraints for DRL systems.

One potential limitation of the research is the reliance on the L^{infty}-norm for minimizing Bellman error, which may not be the most efficient or practical approach in all scenarios. It would be interesting to explore alternative norms or regularization techniques that could achieve a similar level of robustness while potentially improving computational efficiency or sample complexity.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential tradeoffs between robustness and other desirable properties of DRL agents, such as sample efficiency or exploration-exploitation balance. Investigating these tradeoffs could provide valuable insights for practitioners and researchers alike.

Furthermore, the paper's analysis is primarily focused on the theoretical and empirical validation of the proposed CAR-DQN algorithm. It would be beneficial to see a more comprehensive comparison of CAR-DQN against other state-of-the-art robust DRL algorithms, as well as a deeper exploration of the practical implications and potential use cases of the research findings.

Conclusion

This paper makes important contributions to the field of robust deep reinforcement learning by introducing the consistency assumption of policy (CAP) and proving the existence of an optimal robust policy (ORP) that aligns with the Bellman optimal policy. The necessity of the L^{infty}-norm for minimizing Bellman error to attain ORP is a key insight that challenges the approaches used in prior DRL algorithms.

The proposed Consistent Adversarial Robust Deep Q-Network (CAR-DQN) algorithm, which minimizes a surrogate of Bellman Infinity-error, demonstrates strong performance across various benchmarks, validating the practical effectiveness of the researchers' theoretical analysis. This work lays the foundation for developing more robust and reliable DRL agents that can withstand attacks or disturbances, with potentially significant implications for safety-critical applications and real-world deployments.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🖼️

Total Score

0

Towards Optimal Adversarial Robust Q-learning with Bellman Infinity-error

Haoran Li, Zicheng Zhang, Wang Luo, Congying Han, Yudong Hu, Tiande Guo, Shichen Liao

Establishing robust policies is essential to counter attacks or disturbances affecting deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents. Recent studies explore state-adversarial robustness and suggest the potential lack of an optimal robust policy (ORP), posing challenges in setting strict robustness constraints. This work further investigates ORP: At first, we introduce a consistency assumption of policy (CAP) stating that optimal actions in the Markov decision process remain consistent with minor perturbations, supported by empirical and theoretical evidence. Building upon CAP, we crucially prove the existence of a deterministic and stationary ORP that aligns with the Bellman optimal policy. Furthermore, we illustrate the necessity of $L^{infty}$-norm when minimizing Bellman error to attain ORP. This finding clarifies the vulnerability of prior DRL algorithms that target the Bellman optimal policy with $L^{1}$-norm and motivates us to train a Consistent Adversarial Robust Deep Q-Network (CAR-DQN) by minimizing a surrogate of Bellman Infinity-error. The top-tier performance of CAR-DQN across various benchmarks validates its practical effectiveness and reinforces the soundness of our theoretical analysis.

Read more

5/21/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

The Role of Inherent Bellman Error in Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation

Noah Golowich, Ankur Moitra

In this paper, we study the offline RL problem with linear function approximation. Our main structural assumption is that the MDP has low inherent Bellman error, which stipulates that linear value functions have linear Bellman backups with respect to the greedy policy. This assumption is natural in that it is essentially the minimal assumption required for value iteration to succeed. We give a computationally efficient algorithm which succeeds under a single-policy coverage condition on the dataset, namely which outputs a policy whose value is at least that of any policy which is well-covered by the dataset. Even in the setting when the inherent Bellman error is 0 (termed linear Bellman completeness), our algorithm yields the first known guarantee under single-policy coverage. In the setting of positive inherent Bellman error ${varepsilon_{mathrm{BE}}} > 0$, we show that the suboptimality error of our algorithm scales with $sqrt{varepsilon_{mathrm{BE}}}$. Furthermore, we prove that the scaling of the suboptimality with $sqrt{varepsilon_{mathrm{BE}}}$ cannot be improved for any algorithm. Our lower bound stands in contrast to many other settings in reinforcement learning with misspecification, where one can typically obtain performance that degrades linearly with the misspecification error.

Read more

6/19/2024

Robust off-policy Reinforcement Learning via Soft Constrained Adversary
Total Score

0

Robust off-policy Reinforcement Learning via Soft Constrained Adversary

Kosuke Nakanishi, Akihiro Kubo, Yuji Yasui, Shin Ishii

Recently, robust reinforcement learning (RL) methods against input observation have garnered significant attention and undergone rapid evolution due to RL's potential vulnerability. Although these advanced methods have achieved reasonable success, there have been two limitations when considering adversary in terms of long-term horizons. First, the mutual dependency between the policy and its corresponding optimal adversary limits the development of off-policy RL algorithms; although obtaining optimal adversary should depend on the current policy, this has restricted applications to off-policy RL. Second, these methods generally assume perturbations based only on the $L_p$-norm, even when prior knowledge of the perturbation distribution in the environment is available. We here introduce another perspective on adversarial RL: an f-divergence constrained problem with the prior knowledge distribution. From this, we derive two typical attacks and their corresponding robust learning frameworks. The evaluation of robustness is conducted and the results demonstrate that our proposed methods achieve excellent performance in sample-efficient off-policy RL.

Read more

9/4/2024

🎯

Total Score

0

Robust Q-Learning under Corrupted Rewards

Sreejeet Maity, Aritra Mitra

Recently, there has been a surge of interest in analyzing the non-asymptotic behavior of model-free reinforcement learning algorithms. However, the performance of such algorithms in non-ideal environments, such as in the presence of corrupted rewards, is poorly understood. Motivated by this gap, we investigate the robustness of the celebrated Q-learning algorithm to a strong-contamination attack model, where an adversary can arbitrarily perturb a small fraction of the observed rewards. We start by proving that such an attack can cause the vanilla Q-learning algorithm to incur arbitrarily large errors. We then develop a novel robust synchronous Q-learning algorithm that uses historical reward data to construct robust empirical Bellman operators at each time step. Finally, we prove a finite-time convergence rate for our algorithm that matches known state-of-the-art bounds (in the absence of attacks) up to a small inevitable $O(varepsilon)$ error term that scales with the adversarial corruption fraction $varepsilon$. Notably, our results continue to hold even when the true reward distributions have infinite support, provided they admit bounded second moments.

Read more

9/6/2024