ROMA-iQSS: An Objective Alignment Approach via State-Based Value Learning and ROund-Robin Multi-Agent Scheduling

Read original: arXiv:2404.03984 - Published 4/30/2024 by Chi-Hui Lin, Joewie J. Koh, Alessandro Roncone, Lijun Chen
Total Score

0

ROMA-iQSS: An Objective Alignment Approach via State-Based Value Learning and ROund-Robin Multi-Agent Scheduling

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents ROMA-iQSS, a novel approach for aligning the objectives of multiple agents in a multi-agent system.
  • The method combines state-based value learning and a round-robin scheduling algorithm to coordinate the agents' actions and ensure they work towards a common goal.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of ROMA-iQSS through experiments in various multi-agent environments, including competitive multi-agent environments, safety-critical control systems, and coordination in dynamic networks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a new way to coordinate multiple intelligent agents, like robots or computer programs, so that they all work together towards a common goal. The key idea is to have the agents learn the value of different states (or situations) through experience, and then use a scheduling algorithm to take turns making decisions that move the system towards the desired outcome.

This is challenging because the agents may have different, or even conflicting, objectives. The ROMA-iQSS approach tries to align the agents' objectives by teaching them to value the same states highly, even if their individual preferences are initially different. The round-robin scheduling ensures that no single agent dominates the decision-making process, giving each agent a fair chance to influence the system.

The authors test their method in various multi-agent scenarios, such as competitive environments where the agents must compete for resources, safety-critical control systems where the agents need to coordinate to maintain safety, and dynamic network coordination problems where the agents must adapt to changing conditions. The results show that ROMA-iQSS can effectively align the agents' objectives and improve their collective performance in these challenging multi-agent settings.

Technical Explanation

The ROMA-iQSS approach combines two key components: state-based value learning and a round-robin multi-agent scheduling algorithm.

In the state-based value learning component, each agent learns to estimate the value of different states in the environment through experience, using a reinforcement learning technique such as policy gradient methods. The goal is for the agents to converge on a shared understanding of which states are most valuable, even if their individual preferences differ initially.

The round-robin scheduling algorithm then coordinates the agents' decision-making process. At each step, the algorithm gives each agent a turn to make a decision that moves the system towards the high-value states identified through the value learning. This ensures that no single agent dominates the decision-making, allowing the agents to collectively work towards the common goal.

The authors evaluate ROMA-iQSS in a variety of multi-agent environments, including competitive multi-agent scenarios, safety-critical control problems, and dynamic network coordination tasks. The results demonstrate that ROMA-iQSS can effectively align the agents' objectives and improve their collective performance compared to other multi-agent coordination approaches.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach for aligning the objectives of multiple agents in complex multi-agent systems. The combination of state-based value learning and round-robin scheduling is a novel and promising solution to a challenging problem.

One potential limitation of the ROMA-iQSS approach is that it requires the agents to converge on a shared understanding of the environment's state values. In highly dynamic or uncertain environments, this may be difficult to achieve, and the agents' learned value functions could diverge over time. The authors acknowledge this issue and suggest further research into more robust value learning techniques.

Additionally, the paper does not address how ROMA-iQSS would scale to larger multi-agent systems with hundreds or thousands of agents. The round-robin scheduling algorithm may become computationally intractable as the number of agents grows, and alternative coordination mechanisms may be necessary.

Overall, the ROMA-iQSS method represents a significant contribution to the field of multi-agent systems and coordination. The authors have demonstrated its effectiveness in a range of challenging scenarios, and the approach could have important implications for the development of autonomous swarm systems and other multi-agent applications.

Conclusion

The ROMA-iQSS approach presented in this paper offers a promising solution for aligning the objectives of multiple agents in complex multi-agent systems. By combining state-based value learning and a round-robin scheduling algorithm, the method can effectively coordinate the agents' actions towards a common goal, even in the face of conflicting individual preferences.

The authors have demonstrated the effectiveness of ROMA-iQSS in a variety of challenging multi-agent scenarios, including competitive environments, safety-critical control systems, and dynamic network coordination tasks. While the approach has some limitations, it represents a significant advance in the field of multi-agent coordination and could have important implications for the development of autonomous systems and other real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

ROMA-iQSS: An Objective Alignment Approach via State-Based Value Learning and ROund-Robin Multi-Agent Scheduling
Total Score

0

ROMA-iQSS: An Objective Alignment Approach via State-Based Value Learning and ROund-Robin Multi-Agent Scheduling

Chi-Hui Lin, Joewie J. Koh, Alessandro Roncone, Lijun Chen

Effective multi-agent collaboration is imperative for solving complex, distributed problems. In this context, two key challenges must be addressed: first, autonomously identifying optimal objectives for collective outcomes; second, aligning these objectives among agents. Traditional frameworks, often reliant on centralized learning, struggle with scalability and efficiency in large multi-agent systems. To overcome these issues, we introduce a decentralized state-based value learning algorithm that enables agents to independently discover optimal states. Furthermore, we introduce a novel mechanism for multi-agent interaction, wherein less proficient agents follow and adopt policies from more experienced ones, thereby indirectly guiding their learning process. Our theoretical analysis shows that our approach leads decentralized agents to an optimal collective policy. Empirical experiments further demonstrate that our method outperforms existing decentralized state-based and action-based value learning strategies by effectively identifying and aligning optimal objectives.

Read more

4/30/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Multi-agent assignment via state augmented reinforcement learning

Leopoldo Agorio, Sean Van Alen, Miguel Calvo-Fullana, Santiago Paternain, Juan Andres Bazerque

We address the conflicting requirements of a multi-agent assignment problem through constrained reinforcement learning, emphasizing the inadequacy of standard regularization techniques for this purpose. Instead, we recur to a state augmentation approach in which the oscillation of dual variables is exploited by agents to alternate between tasks. In addition, we coordinate the actions of the multiple agents acting on their local states through these multipliers, which are gossiped through a communication network, eliminating the need to access other agent states. By these means, we propose a distributed multi-agent assignment protocol with theoretical feasibility guarantees that we corroborate in a monitoring numerical experiment.

Read more

6/5/2024

A Distributed Approach to Autonomous Intersection Management via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

A Distributed Approach to Autonomous Intersection Management via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Matteo Cederle, Marco Fabris, Gian Antonio Susto

Autonomous intersection management (AIM) poses significant challenges due to the intricate nature of real-world traffic scenarios and the need for a highly expensive centralised server in charge of simultaneously controlling all the vehicles. This study addresses such issues by proposing a novel distributed approach to AIM utilizing multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). We show that by leveraging the 3D surround view technology for advanced assistance systems, autonomous vehicles can accurately navigate intersection scenarios without needing any centralised controller. The contributions of this paper thus include a MARL-based algorithm for the autonomous management of a 4-way intersection and also the introduction of a new strategy called prioritised scenario replay for improved training efficacy. We validate our approach as an innovative alternative to conventional centralised AIM techniques, ensuring the full reproducibility of our results. Specifically, experiments conducted in virtual environments using the SMARTS platform highlight its superiority over benchmarks across various metrics.

Read more

5/15/2024

Algorithms for learning value-aligned policies considering admissibility relaxation
Total Score

0

Algorithms for learning value-aligned policies considering admissibility relaxation

Andr'es Holgado-S'anchez, Joaqu'in Arias, Holger Billhardt, Sascha Ossowski

The emerging field of emph{value awareness engineering} claims that software agents and systems should be value-aware, i.e. they must make decisions in accordance with human values. In this context, such agents must be capable of explicitly reasoning as to how far different courses of action are aligned with these values. For this purpose, values are often modelled as preferences over states or actions, which are then aggregated to determine the sequences of actions that are maximally aligned with a certain value. Recently, additional value admissibility constraints at this level have been considered as well. However, often relaxed versions of these constraints are needed, and this increases considerably the complexity of computing value-aligned policies. To obtain efficient algorithms that make value-aligned decisions considering admissibility relaxation, we propose the use of learning techniques, in particular, we have used constrained reinforcement learning algorithms. In this paper, we present two algorithms, $epsilontext{-}ADQL$ for strategies based on local alignment and its extension $epsilontext{-}CADQL$ for a sequence of decisions. We have validated their efficiency in a water distribution problem in a drought scenario.

Read more

6/10/2024