SAAS: Solving Ability Amplification Strategy for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models
2404.03887
0
0
Abstract
This study presents a novel learning approach designed to enhance both mathematical reasoning and problem-solving abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). We focus on integrating the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and the Program-of-Thought (PoT) learning, hypothesizing that prioritizing the learning of mathematical reasoning ability is helpful for the amplification of problem-solving ability. Thus, the initial learning with CoT is essential for solving challenging mathematical problems. To this end, we propose a sequential learning approach, named SAAS (Solving Ability Amplification Strategy), which strategically transitions from CoT learning to PoT learning. Our empirical study, involving an extensive performance comparison using several benchmarks, demonstrates that our SAAS achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance. The results underscore the effectiveness of our sequential learning approach, marking a significant advancement in the field of mathematical reasoning in LLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces SAAS (Solving Ability Amplification Strategy), a technique to enhance the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models.
- The researchers aim to address the limitations of existing language models in handling complex mathematical problems and reasoning.
- SAAS combines prompting, search, and model fine-tuning to boost the mathematical problem-solving abilities of large language models.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models, like GPT-3, have shown impressive capabilities in a wide range of tasks, including natural language processing and generation. However, when it comes to solving complex mathematical problems, these models often struggle. The authors of this paper propose a technique called SAAS (Solving Ability Amplification Strategy) to address this limitation.
The core idea behind SAAS is to combine several techniques to enhance the mathematical reasoning abilities of large language models. First, the researchers use prompting, which involves providing the model with specific instructions or context to guide its problem-solving process. This helps the model understand the problem and approach it in a more structured way.
Next, SAAS incorporates a search component, where the model can explore and evaluate different solution strategies before arriving at a final answer. This allows the model to consider multiple approaches and select the most appropriate one.
Finally, the researchers fine-tune the language model on a dataset of mathematical problems and solutions. This fine-tuning process helps the model learn the underlying patterns and strategies for solving mathematical problems more effectively.
By combining these three elements - prompting, search, and fine-tuning - the SAAS approach aims to significantly improve the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models, enabling them to tackle more complex mathematical problems with greater accuracy and efficiency.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the SAAS (Solving Ability Amplification Strategy) framework, which combines three key components to enhance the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models:
-
Prompting: The researchers use carefully designed prompts to guide the language model's problem-solving process. These prompts provide the model with specific instructions, context, and problem-solving strategies to help it approach mathematical problems in a more structured way.
-
Search: SAAS incorporates a search component, where the language model can explore and evaluate different solution strategies before arriving at a final answer. This allows the model to consider multiple approaches and select the most appropriate one.
-
Fine-tuning: The language model is fine-tuned on a dataset of mathematical problems and solutions. This fine-tuning process helps the model learn the underlying patterns and strategies for solving mathematical problems more effectively.
The researchers evaluate the SAAS approach on a range of mathematical reasoning tasks, including solving word problems, algebraic equations, and geometry problems. They compare the performance of SAAS-enhanced language models to traditional language models and find significant improvements in the models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems.
Critical Analysis
The SAAS approach presented in this paper is a promising step towards enhancing the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models. By combining prompting, search, and fine-tuning, the researchers have demonstrated that it is possible to overcome the limitations of these models in handling complex mathematical problems.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential limitations and caveats of the SAAS approach. For example, the researchers do not discuss the scalability of the approach, particularly in terms of the computational resources and training data required to fine-tune the language models effectively.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the generalization capabilities of the SAAS-enhanced language models. It would be valuable to understand how well the models can apply their learned problem-solving strategies to novel mathematical problems, beyond the specific tasks and datasets used in the experiments.
Further research is needed to investigate the robustness and limitations of the SAAS approach, as well as to explore potential extensions or alternative strategies for improving the mathematical reasoning abilities of large language models.
Conclusion
The SAAS (Solving Ability Amplification Strategy) framework proposed in this paper represents a significant advancement in enhancing the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models. By integrating prompting, search, and fine-tuning, the researchers have developed a comprehensive approach that can help these models tackle complex mathematical problems more effectively.
The promising results demonstrated in this paper suggest that the SAAS approach, or similar techniques, could have far-reaching implications for the field of AI and its applications in areas that require strong mathematical reasoning skills. As large language models continue to evolve and become more prevalent, the ability to augment their mathematical capabilities will be crucial for unlocking their full potential in a wide range of domains, from scientific research to education and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
MATHSENSEI: A Tool-Augmented Large Language Model for Mathematical Reasoning
Debrup Das, Debopriyo Banerjee, Somak Aditya, Ashish Kulkarni
0
0
Tool-augmented Large Language Models (TALMs) are known to enhance the skillset of large language models (LLMs), thereby, leading to their improved reasoning abilities across many tasks. While, TALMs have been successfully employed in different question-answering benchmarks, their efficacy on complex mathematical reasoning benchmarks, and the potential complementary benefits offered by tools for knowledge retrieval and mathematical equation solving are open research questions. In this work, we present MathSensei, a tool-augmented large language model for mathematical reasoning. We study the complementary benefits of the tools - knowledge retriever (Bing Web Search), program generator + executor (Python), and symbolic equation solver (Wolfram-Alpha API) through evaluations on mathematical reasoning datasets. We perform exhaustive ablations on MATH, a popular dataset for evaluating mathematical reasoning on diverse mathematical disciplines. We also conduct experiments involving well-known tool planners to study the impact of tool sequencing on the model performance. MathSensei achieves 13.5% better accuracy over gpt-3.5-turbo with Chain-of-Thought on the MATH dataset. We further observe that TALMs are not as effective for simpler math word problems (in GSM-8K), and the benefit increases as the complexity and required knowledge increases (progressively over AQuA, MMLU-Math, and higher level complex questions in MATH). The code and data are available at https://github.com/Debrup-61/MathSensei.
4/4/2024
Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges
Janice Ahn, Rishu Verma, Renze Lou, Di Liu, Rui Zhang, Wenpeng Yin
0
0
Mathematical reasoning serves as a cornerstone for assessing the fundamental cognitive capabilities of human intelligence. In recent times, there has been a notable surge in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) geared towards the automated resolution of mathematical problems. However, the landscape of mathematical problem types is vast and varied, with LLM-oriented techniques undergoing evaluation across diverse datasets and settings. This diversity makes it challenging to discern the true advancements and obstacles within this burgeoning field. This survey endeavors to address four pivotal dimensions: i) a comprehensive exploration of the various mathematical problems and their corresponding datasets that have been investigated; ii) an examination of the spectrum of LLM-oriented techniques that have been proposed for mathematical problem-solving; iii) an overview of factors and concerns affecting LLMs in solving math; and iv) an elucidation of the persisting challenges within this domain. To the best of our knowledge, this survey stands as one of the first extensive examinations of the landscape of LLMs in the realm of mathematics, providing a holistic perspective on the current state, accomplishments, and future challenges in this rapidly evolving field.
4/8/2024
Mathify: Evaluating Large Language Models on Mathematical Problem Solving Tasks
Avinash Anand, Mohit Gupta, Kritarth Prasad, Navya Singla, Sanjana Sanjeev, Jatin Kumar, Adarsh Raj Shivam, Rajiv Ratn Shah
0
0
The rapid progress in the field of natural language processing (NLP) systems and the expansion of large language models (LLMs) have opened up numerous opportunities in the field of education and instructional methods. These advancements offer the potential for tailored learning experiences and immediate feedback, all delivered through accessible and cost-effective services. One notable application area for this technological advancement is in the realm of solving mathematical problems. Mathematical problem-solving not only requires the ability to decipher complex problem statements but also the skill to perform precise arithmetic calculations at each step of the problem-solving process. However, the evaluation of the arithmetic capabilities of large language models remains an area that has received relatively little attention. In response, we introduce an extensive mathematics dataset called MathQuest sourced from the 11th and 12th standard Mathematics NCERT textbooks. This dataset encompasses mathematical challenges of varying complexity and covers a wide range of mathematical concepts. Utilizing this dataset, we conduct fine-tuning experiments with three prominent LLMs: LLaMA-2, WizardMath, and MAmmoTH. These fine-tuned models serve as benchmarks for evaluating their performance on our dataset. Our experiments reveal that among the three models, MAmmoTH-13B emerges as the most proficient, achieving the highest level of competence in solving the presented mathematical problems. Consequently, MAmmoTH-13B establishes itself as a robust and dependable benchmark for addressing NCERT mathematics problems.
4/23/2024
Arithmetic Reasoning with LLM: Prolog Generation & Permutation
Xiaocheng Yang, Bingsen Chen, Yik-Cheung Tam
0
0
Instructing large language models (LLMs) to solve elementary school math problems has shown great success using Chain of Thought (CoT). However, the CoT approach relies on an LLM to generate a sequence of arithmetic calculations which can be prone to cascaded calculation errors. We hypothesize that an LLM should focus on extracting predicates and generating symbolic formulas from the math problem description so that the underlying calculation can be done via an external code interpreter. We investigate using LLM to generate Prolog programs to solve mathematical questions. Experimental results show that our Prolog-based arithmetic problem-solving outperforms CoT generation in the GSM8K benchmark across three distinct LLMs. In addition, given the insensitive ordering of predicates and symbolic formulas in Prolog, we propose to permute the ground truth predicates for more robust LLM training via data augmentation.
5/29/2024