Safe and Reliable Training of Learning-Based Aerospace Controllers
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a framework for the safe and reliable training of learning-based aerospace controllers, which is crucial for ensuring the safety of complex autonomous systems.
- The researchers focus on using formal verification techniques to guarantee the safety and reliability of deep neural network-based controllers for aerospace applications.
- They introduce a novel approach that combines deep reinforcement learning with formal verification to train controllers that are both high-performing and provably safe.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the challenge of ensuring the safety and reliability of autonomous aerospace systems, such as drones or self-flying aircraft. These systems often rely on complex machine learning algorithms, like deep neural networks, to control their movements and make decisions. However, it can be difficult to guarantee that these "learning-based" controllers will always behave safely, especially in critical situations.
The researchers propose a new framework that combines deep reinforcement learning, a powerful technique for training controllers, with formal verification, a mathematical approach for proving the safety of a system. The key idea is to train the neural network controller using reinforcement learning, but then verify that it will always remain within safe operating limits, even in unexpected scenarios.
This approach is particularly important for aerospace applications, where system failures can have catastrophic consequences. By ensuring the safety and reliability of the neural network controller, the researchers aim to enable the widespread deployment of complex autonomous aircraft and drones, while giving engineers and the public confidence in their safety.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for the safe and reliable training of learning-based aerospace controllers using a combination of deep reinforcement learning and formal verification techniques.
The researchers first train a deep neural network controller using deep reinforcement learning. This involves defining a set of desired behaviors and reward functions, and then using an iterative learning process to optimize the neural network to maximize the expected cumulative reward. This allows the controller to learn complex maneuvering strategies that are high-performing in simulation.
However, the key innovation is the subsequent formal verification step. The researchers use techniques from the field of formal verification to mathematically prove that the trained neural network controller will remain within safe operating limits, even in the face of disturbances or unexpected scenarios. This involves constructing Lyapunov functions, which are mathematical expressions that guarantee the stability and safety of the system.
By integrating the deep reinforcement learning and formal verification components, the researchers are able to train controllers that are both high-performing and provably safe. They demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through case studies involving aerospace systems, such as quadrotor drones and spacecraft attitude control.
The paper builds on related work in the areas of formally verifying deep reinforcement learning controllers, verified safe reinforcement learning with neural networks, and transferring safety-critical controllers through learning-based deep inverse models. The proposed framework also shares similarities with provably safe neural network controllers via differential flatness and integrating deep reinforcement learning with robust low-level control for robotic systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach for ensuring the safety and reliability of learning-based aerospace controllers. The combination of deep reinforcement learning and formal verification is a novel and promising direction, and the case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the method in realistic scenarios.
One potential limitation is the computational complexity of the formal verification step, which could make the framework challenging to scale to very large or high-dimensional systems. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore ways to improve the efficiency of the verification process, such as through the use of neural network approximations or other abstraction techniques.
Additionally, the paper does not address the challenge of bridging the gap between the simulated training environment and the real-world deployment of the aerospace systems. While the formal verification guarantees the safety of the controller within the simulated model, there may be unmodeled factors or uncertainties in the real-world that could potentially compromise the safety of the system. Addressing this "sim-to-real" transfer problem could be an important area for future research.
Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of safe and reliable machine learning for aerospace applications. The proposed framework represents a significant step forward in enabling the widespread deployment of complex autonomous systems while ensuring their safety and reliability.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel framework for the safe and reliable training of learning-based aerospace controllers. By combining deep reinforcement learning with formal verification techniques, the researchers have developed a approach that can produce high-performing controllers that are provably safe, even in the face of unexpected scenarios or disturbances.
The significance of this work lies in its potential to enable the widespread deployment of complex autonomous aerospace systems, such as drones and self-flying aircraft, while giving engineers and the public confidence in their safety. As machine learning continues to play an increasingly important role in these critical systems, approaches like the one presented in this paper will be crucial for ensuring their reliability and trustworthiness.
The paper builds on related work in areas like verified safe reinforcement learning and provably safe neural network controllers, and the researchers acknowledge the need to address challenges related to computational complexity and the sim-to-real transfer problem. Overall, this research represents an important step forward in the quest to develop safe and reliable learning-based controllers for aerospace and other safety-critical applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Safe and Reliable Training of Learning-Based Aerospace Controllers
Udayan Mandal, Guy Amir, Haoze Wu, Ieva Daukantas, Fletcher Lee Newell, Umberto Ravaioli, Baoluo Meng, Michael Durling, Kerianne Hobbs, Milan Ganai, Tobey Shim, Guy Katz, Clark Barrett
In recent years, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approaches have generated highly successful controllers for a myriad of complex domains. However, the opaque nature of these models limits their applicability in aerospace systems and safety-critical domains, in which a single mistake can have dire consequences. In this paper, we present novel advancements in both the training and verification of DRL controllers, which can help ensure their safe behavior. We showcase a design-for-verification approach utilizing k-induction and demonstrate its use in verifying liveness properties. In addition, we also give a brief overview of neural Lyapunov Barrier certificates and summarize their capabilities on a case study. Finally, we describe several other novel reachability-based approaches which, despite failing to provide guarantees of interest, could be effective for verification of other DRL systems, and could be of further interest to the community.
Read more7/10/2024
0
Formally Verifying Deep Reinforcement Learning Controllers with Lyapunov Barrier Certificates
Udayan Mandal, Guy Amir, Haoze Wu, Ieva Daukantas, Fletcher Lee Newell, Umberto J. Ravaioli, Baoluo Meng, Michael Durling, Milan Ganai, Tobey Shim, Guy Katz, Clark Barrett
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is a powerful machine learning paradigm for generating agents that control autonomous systems. However, the ``black box'' nature of DRL agents limits their deployment in real-world safety-critical applications. A promising approach for providing strong guarantees on an agent's behavior is to use Neural Lyapunov Barrier (NLB) certificates, which are learned functions over the system whose properties indirectly imply that an agent behaves as desired. However, NLB-based certificates are typically difficult to learn and even more difficult to verify, especially for complex systems. In this work, we present a novel method for training and verifying NLB-based certificates for discrete-time systems. Specifically, we introduce a technique for certificate composition, which simplifies the verification of highly-complex systems by strategically designing a sequence of certificates. When jointly verified with neural network verification engines, these certificates provide a formal guarantee that a DRL agent both achieves its goals and avoids unsafe behavior. Furthermore, we introduce a technique for certificate filtering, which significantly simplifies the process of producing formally verified certificates. We demonstrate the merits of our approach with a case study on providing safety and liveness guarantees for a DRL-controlled spacecraft.
Read more8/16/2024
🏅
0
Verified Safe Reinforcement Learning for Neural Network Dynamic Models
Junlin Wu, Huan Zhang, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
Learning reliably safe autonomous control is one of the core problems in trustworthy autonomy. However, training a controller that can be formally verified to be safe remains a major challenge. We introduce a novel approach for learning verified safe control policies in nonlinear neural dynamical systems while maximizing overall performance. Our approach aims to achieve safety in the sense of finite-horizon reachability proofs, and is comprised of three key parts. The first is a novel curriculum learning scheme that iteratively increases the verified safe horizon. The second leverages the iterative nature of gradient-based learning to leverage incremental verification, reusing information from prior verification runs. Finally, we learn multiple verified initial-state-dependent controllers, an idea that is especially valuable for more complex domains where learning a single universal verified safe controller is extremely challenging. Our experiments on five safe control problems demonstrate that our trained controllers can achieve verified safety over horizons that are as much as an order of magnitude longer than state-of-the-art baselines, while maintaining high reward, as well as a perfect safety record over entire episodes.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Transfer of Safety Controllers Through Learning Deep Inverse Dynamics Model
Alireza Nadali, Ashutosh Trivedi, Majid Zamani
Control barrier certificates have proven effective in formally guaranteeing the safety of the control systems. However, designing a control barrier certificate is a time-consuming and computationally expensive endeavor that requires expert input in the form of domain knowledge and mathematical maturity. Additionally, when a system undergoes slight changes, the new controller and its correctness certificate need to be recomputed, incurring similar computational challenges as those faced during the design of the original controller. Prior approaches have utilized transfer learning to transfer safety guarantees in the form of a barrier certificate while maintaining the control invariant. Unfortunately, in practical settings, the source and the target environments often deviate substantially in their control inputs, rendering the aforementioned approach impractical. To address this challenge, we propose integrating emph{inverse dynamics} -- a neural network that suggests required action given a desired successor state -- of the target system with the barrier certificate of the source system to provide formal proof of safety. In addition, we propose a validity condition that, when met, guarantees correctness of the controller. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through three case studies.
Read more5/28/2024