Scale-Adaptive Balancing of Exploration and Exploitation in Classical Planning

Overview

• Exploration and exploitation is an important problem in game tree search and automated planning.
• The planning community has had limited success in applying insights from the Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) literature to address this problem.
• The paper proposes a new algorithm called GreedyUCT-Normal, which improves upon existing Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and Trial-Based Heuristic Tree Search (THTS) algorithms by better handling different scales of rewards.

Plain English Explanation

When machines are trying to solve complex planning problems, they often face a tradeoff between exploration - trying new approaches to discover better solutions, and exploitation - focusing on what has worked well in the past. Researchers have studied this problem extensively in the context of Multi-Armed Bandits (MABs), which are simplified models of this exploration-exploitation dilemma.

However, the planning community has struggled to apply the insights from MAB research to real-world planning algorithms. The paper explains that a key issue is that popular MAB algorithms like UCB1 make assumptions about the reward distributions that don't match what happens in heuristic-based planning algorithms.

To address this, the paper proposes a new algorithm called GreedyUCT-Normal. This algorithm uses a modified version of the UCB1 bandit algorithm that explicitly takes into account the different scales of the rewards encountered during planning. The result is an improved planning system that can find more plans using fewer computational resources compared to existing approaches.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on improving Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and Trial-Based Heuristic Tree Search (THTS) algorithms for classical planning problems. These algorithms use MAB techniques like UCB1 to balance exploration and exploitation during the search process.

However, the authors note that the theoretical requirements of UCB1 - namely that rewards have a fixed, bounded support - are not satisfied in the heuristic-based reward distributions encountered in classical planning. This leads to suboptimal performance.

To address this, the paper introduces GreedyUCT-Normal, a new MCTS/THTS algorithm that uses a modified UCB1 bandit algorithm called UCB1-Normal. This version of UCB1 explicitly models the different scales of the rewards by taking the reward variance into account.

The authors evaluate GreedyUCT-Normal against existing MCTS/THTS algorithms as well as a Greedy Best First Search baseline. Their results show that GreedyUCT-Normal is able to find more plans using fewer node expansions, demonstrating improved algorithmic performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a useful theoretical analysis of the limitations of applying standard MAB algorithms like UCB1 to heuristic-based planning problems. The proposed GreedyUCT-Normal algorithm appears to be an effective solution to this problem, though the evaluation is limited to classical planning domains.

One potential area for further research would be to examine how well GreedyUCT-Normal generalizes to other types of planning problems, such as probabilistic planning or multi-agent planning. Additionally, a more thorough complexity analysis of the algorithm could help quantify its computational overhead compared to simpler approaches.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by highlighting an important gap between MAB theory and planning practice, and proposing a novel algorithmic solution to bridge that gap.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates how a deeper theoretical understanding of Multi-Armed Bandits can lead to improved planning algorithms. By addressing the mismatch between standard MAB assumptions and the realities of heuristic-based planning, the authors were able to develop GreedyUCT-Normal - an MCTS/THTS algorithm with better exploration-exploitation performance.

The implications of this work extend beyond classical planning, as the principles of adaptively handling reward distributions could be applicable to a wide range of sequential decision-making problems. As researchers continue to bridge the gap between bandit theory and real-world applications, we can expect to see further advancements in the field of automated planning and decision-making.