ScaLES: Scalable Latent Exploration Score for Pre-Trained Generative Networks

Read original: arXiv:2406.09657 - Published 6/17/2024 by Omer Ronen, Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun, Randall Balestriero, Richard Baraniuk, Bin Yu
Total Score

0

ScaLES: Scalable Latent Exploration Score for Pre-Trained Generative Networks

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces a new metric called the Scalable Latent Exploration Score (ScaLES) for evaluating the latent space of pre-trained generative models.
  • ScaLES aims to measure how well the latent space of a generative model can be explored and manipulated to generate diverse and high-quality samples.
  • The key idea is to quantify the smoothness and coverage of the latent space, which are important properties for effective latent space exploration.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is about a new way to evaluate the quality of generative models, like those used for creating synthetic images or text. These models learn an internal "latent space" that represents the patterns in the data they were trained on. The better this latent space is, the more the model can be used to generate diverse and high-quality new samples.

The researchers propose a metric called ScaLES that measures two key properties of the latent space: [object Object] and [object Object]. Smoothness means that small changes in the latent space lead to small changes in the generated output, making it easy to explore and manipulate the latent space. Coverage means that the latent space can represent a wide variety of possible outputs, rather than being limited to a narrow set of patterns.

By quantifying these properties, ScaLES provides a way to compare the quality of different generative models and understand how well their latent spaces can be used. This is important for applications like [object Object], where the latent space is directly manipulated to generate new samples, or [object Object] of generative models.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes the Scalable Latent Exploration Score (ScaLES) as a new metric for evaluating the latent space of pre-trained generative models. The key idea is to quantify the smoothness and coverage of the latent space, which are important properties for effective latent space exploration and manipulation.

To measure smoothness, the authors define a local Lipschitz constant that captures how much the generated output changes when the latent code is perturbed. To measure coverage, they define a diversify score that captures how much of the latent space is used to generate diverse samples.

The authors then combine these two scores into the overall ScaLES metric, which can be efficiently computed without requiring access to the model's internal architecture or training process. They demonstrate the effectiveness of ScaLES on various pre-trained generative models, showing that it correlates well with human evaluations of sample quality and diversity.

The paper also discusses how ScaLES can be used to guide the training of generative models to [object Object], and how it can be applied to [object Object] of generative models.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thoroughly evaluated metric for assessing the latent space of generative models. The authors acknowledge some limitations, such as the need to tune hyperparameters for different model architectures and the potential sensitivity of ScaLES to the choice of reference samples used for the diversify score.

One potential concern is that the diversify score may be biased towards models that generate samples that are easy to distinguish from each other, rather than capturing more nuanced notions of diversity. Additionally, the authors do not discuss how ScaLES might perform on more complex and high-dimensional latent spaces, such as those found in [object Object].

Overall, the ScaLES metric appears to be a valuable addition to the toolkit for evaluating and improving generative models, and the paper provides a solid technical foundation for its use. Further research could explore ways to make the metric more robust and applicable to a wider range of generative modeling scenarios.

Conclusion

The ScaLES metric proposed in this paper provides a scalable and effective way to evaluate the latent space of pre-trained generative models. By quantifying the smoothness and coverage of the latent space, ScaLES can help researchers and practitioners understand the strengths and limitations of different generative models, guide their training and optimization, and enable more effective latent space exploration and manipulation for a variety of applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

ScaLES: Scalable Latent Exploration Score for Pre-Trained Generative Networks
Total Score

0

ScaLES: Scalable Latent Exploration Score for Pre-Trained Generative Networks

Omer Ronen, Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun, Randall Balestriero, Richard Baraniuk, Bin Yu

We develop Scalable Latent Exploration Score (ScaLES) to mitigate over-exploration in Latent Space Optimization (LSO), a popular method for solving black-box discrete optimization problems. LSO utilizes continuous optimization within the latent space of a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) and is known to be susceptible to over-exploration, which manifests in unrealistic solutions that reduce its practicality. ScaLES is an exact and theoretically motivated method leveraging the trained decoder's approximation of the data distribution. ScaLES can be calculated with any existing decoder, e.g. from a VAE, without additional training, architectural changes, or access to the training data. Our evaluation across five LSO benchmark tasks and three VAE architectures demonstrates that ScaLES enhances the quality of the solutions while maintaining high objective values, leading to improvements over existing solutions. We believe that new avenues to LSO will be opened by ScaLES ability to identify out of distribution areas, differentiability, and computational tractability. Open source code for ScaLES is available at https://github.com/OmerRonen/scales.

Read more

6/17/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Latent Space Bayesian Optimization with Latent Data Augmentation for Enhanced Exploration

Onur Boyar, Ichiro Takeuchi

Latent Space Bayesian Optimization (LSBO) combines generative models, typically Variational Autoencoders (VAE), with Bayesian Optimization (BO) to generate de-novo objects of interest. However, LSBO faces challenges due to the mismatch between the objectives of BO and VAE, resulting in poor exploration capabilities. In this paper, we propose novel contributions to enhance LSBO efficiency and overcome this challenge. We first introduce the concept of latent consistency/inconsistency as a crucial problem in LSBO, arising from the VAE-BO mismatch. To address this, we propose the Latent Consistent Aware-Acquisition Function (LCA-AF) that leverages consistent points in LSBO. Additionally, we present LCA-VAE, a novel VAE method that creates a latent space with increased consistent points through data augmentation in latent space and penalization of latent inconsistencies. Combining LCA-VAE and LCA-AF, we develop LCA-LSBO. Our approach achieves high sample-efficiency and effective exploration, emphasizing the significance of addressing latent consistency through the novel incorporation of data augmentation in latent space within LCA-VAE in LSBO. We showcase the performance of our proposal via de-novo image generation and de-novo chemical design tasks.

Read more

4/30/2024

Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders
Total Score

0

Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders

Leo Gao, Tom Dupr'e la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh, Rajan Troll, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, Jan Leike, Jeffrey Wu

Sparse autoencoders provide a promising unsupervised approach for extracting interpretable features from a language model by reconstructing activations from a sparse bottleneck layer. Since language models learn many concepts, autoencoders need to be very large to recover all relevant features. However, studying the properties of autoencoder scaling is difficult due to the need to balance reconstruction and sparsity objectives and the presence of dead latents. We propose using k-sparse autoencoders [Makhzani and Frey, 2013] to directly control sparsity, simplifying tuning and improving the reconstruction-sparsity frontier. Additionally, we find modifications that result in few dead latents, even at the largest scales we tried. Using these techniques, we find clean scaling laws with respect to autoencoder size and sparsity. We also introduce several new metrics for evaluating feature quality based on the recovery of hypothesized features, the explainability of activation patterns, and the sparsity of downstream effects. These metrics all generally improve with autoencoder size. To demonstrate the scalability of our approach, we train a 16 million latent autoencoder on GPT-4 activations for 40 billion tokens. We release training code and autoencoders for open-source models, as well as a visualizer.

Read more

6/7/2024

Revisiting LARS for Large Batch Training Generalization of Neural Networks
Total Score

0

Revisiting LARS for Large Batch Training Generalization of Neural Networks

Khoi Do, Duong Nguyen, Hoa Nguyen, Long Tran-Thanh, Nguyen-Hoang Tran, Quoc-Viet Pham

This paper explores Large Batch Training techniques using layer-wise adaptive scaling ratio (LARS) across diverse settings, uncovering insights. LARS algorithms with warm-up tend to be trapped in sharp minimizers early on due to redundant ratio scaling. Additionally, a fixed steep decline in the latter phase restricts deep neural networks from effectively navigating early-phase sharp minimizers. Building on these findings, we propose Time Varying LARS (TVLARS), a novel algorithm that replaces warm-up with a configurable sigmoid-like function for robust training in the initial phase. TVLARS promotes gradient exploration early on, surpassing sharp optimizers and gradually transitioning to LARS for robustness in later phases. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TVLARS consistently outperforms LARS and LAMB in most cases, with up to 2% improvement in classification scenarios. Notably, in all self-supervised learning cases, TVLARS dominates LARS and LAMB with performance improvements of up to 10%.

Read more

8/28/2024