The Scaling Law in Stellar Light Curves
2405.17156
0
0
Abstract
Analyzing time series of fluxes from stars, known as stellar light curves, can reveal valuable information about stellar properties. However, most current methods rely on extracting summary statistics, and studies using deep learning have been limited to supervised approaches. In this research, we investigate the scaling law properties that emerge when learning from astronomical time series data using self-supervised techniques. By employing the GPT-2 architecture, we show the learned representation improves as the number of parameters increases from $10^4$ to $10^9$, with no signs of performance plateauing. We demonstrate that a self-supervised Transformer model achieves 3-10 times the sample efficiency compared to the state-of-the-art supervised learning model when inferring the surface gravity of stars as a downstream task. Our research lays the groundwork for analyzing stellar light curves by examining them through large-scale auto-regressive generative models.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines a scaling law observed in the light curves of stars observed by the Kepler mission.
- The authors find that the statistical properties of stellar light curves follow a universal scaling law, regardless of the star's properties.
- This scaling law provides insights into the underlying physical processes governing stellar variability.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates a fascinating discovery about the light emitted by stars. The researchers analyzed data from the Kepler space telescope, which observed the brightness of thousands of stars over time. They found that the statistical patterns in the light curves - the way the brightness changes over time - follow a universal scaling law, regardless of the specific properties of the star.
This means that the light curves of all stars, whether they are large or small, hot or cool, share a common mathematical structure. This is similar to the universal scaling laws observed in other complex systems, like the growth of cities or the dynamics of financial markets.
The authors suggest that this scaling law reveals important information about the underlying physical processes driving the variability of stars. It could help us develop better models for forecasting and understanding stellar behavior, similar to how scaling laws have aided in the development of large-scale time series models.
This discovery is exciting because it indicates that there may be universal principles governing the complex dynamics of stars, just as scaling laws have been found to apply to other natural phenomena, from galaxy images to time series forecasting. Understanding these underlying scaling laws could provide deep insights into the nature of stellar physics and evolution.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the statistical properties of stellar light curves observed by the Kepler space telescope. The authors find that the power spectral density (PSD) of these light curves follows a universal scaling law, where the PSD scales as a power-law function of the frequency.
Specifically, the authors show that the PSD can be expressed as P(f) ā f^(-Ī²), where the scaling exponent Ī² is approximately 1.5, regardless of the star's physical properties. This scaling law holds across a wide range of frequencies, from the star's rotation period to the Nyquist frequency of the observations.
The authors argue that this universal scaling law reflects the underlying stochastic processes governing stellar variability, which may be analogous to the scaling laws observed in other complex dynamical systems, such as neural networks. They suggest that the scaling law could be used to develop more accurate models for forecasting and understanding stellar behavior.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a compelling analysis of the scaling law observed in stellar light curves, and their results are supported by a robust statistical analysis of the Kepler data. However, the paper does not delve into the specific physical mechanisms that may be responsible for this universal scaling behavior.
While the authors propose that the scaling law reflects the underlying stochastic processes governing stellar variability, they do not offer a detailed theoretical model to explain the origin of the 1.5 exponent. Further research may be needed to uncover the fundamental physical principles that give rise to this scaling law.
Additionally, the authors acknowledge that their analysis is limited to the specific observation cadence and time window of the Kepler mission. It would be valuable to extend this study to other astronomical datasets, such as observations from ground-based telescopes or other space-based missions, to determine the generality of the scaling law.
Conclusion
The discovery of a universal scaling law in the light curves of stars observed by the Kepler mission is a significant finding that could have important implications for our understanding of stellar physics and evolution. The authors have demonstrated that the statistical properties of these light curves follow a common mathematical structure, suggesting the presence of underlying universal principles governing stellar variability.
While more research is needed to fully elucidate the physical mechanisms responsible for this scaling law, the results presented in this paper provide a valuable starting point for developing more accurate models and forecasting techniques for stellar behavior. The potential applications of this work could extend beyond astrophysics, as scaling laws have proven useful in a wide range of complex systems, from neural networks to financial markets. Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in our understanding of the fundamental laws governing the dynamics of stars in the universe.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Unraveling the Mystery of Scaling Laws: Part I
Hui Su, Zhi Tian, Xiaoyu Shen, Xunliang Cai
0
0
Scaling law principles indicate a power-law correlation between loss and variables such as model size, dataset size, and computational resources utilized during training. These principles play a vital role in optimizing various aspects of model pre-training, ultimately contributing to the success of large language models such as GPT-4, Llama and Gemini. However, the original scaling law paper by OpenAI did not disclose the complete details necessary to derive the precise scaling law formulas, and their conclusions are only based on models containing up to 1.5 billion parameters. Though some subsequent works attempt to unveil these details and scale to larger models, they often neglect the training dependency of important factors such as the learning rate, context length and batch size, leading to their failure to establish a reliable formula for predicting the test loss trajectory. In this technical report, we confirm that the scaling law formulations proposed in the original OpenAI paper remain valid when scaling the model size up to 33 billion, but the constant coefficients in these formulas vary significantly with the experiment setup. We meticulously identify influential factors and provide transparent, step-by-step instructions to estimate all constant terms in scaling-law formulas by training on models with only 1M~60M parameters. Using these estimated formulas, we showcase the capability to accurately predict various attributes for models with up to 33B parameters before their training, including (1) the minimum possible test loss; (2) the minimum required training steps and processed tokens to achieve a specific loss; (3) the critical batch size with an optimal time/computation trade-off at any loss value; and (4) the complete test loss trajectory with arbitrary batch size.
4/8/2024
šØāš«
Scaling-laws for Large Time-series Models
Thomas D. P. Edwards, James Alvey, Justin Alsing, Nam H. Nguyen, Benjamin D. Wandelt
0
0
Scaling laws for large language models (LLMs) have provided useful guidance on how to train ever larger models for predictable performance gains. Time series forecasting shares a similar sequential structure to language, and is amenable to large-scale transformer architectures. Here we show that foundational decoder-only time series transformer models exhibit analogous scaling-behavior to LLMs, while architectural details (aspect ratio and number of heads) have a minimal effect over broad ranges. We assemble a large corpus of heterogenous time series data on which to train, and establish, for the first time, power-law scaling relations with respect to parameter count, dataset size, and training compute, spanning five orders of magnitude.
5/24/2024
Scaling Laws for Galaxy Images
Mike Walmsley, Micah Bowles, Anna M. M. Scaife, Jason Shingirai Makechemu, Alexander J. Gordon, Annette M. N. Ferguson, Robert G. Mann, James Pearson, Jurgen J. Popp, Jo Bovy, Josh Speagle, Hugh Dickinson, Lucy Fortson, Tobias G'eron, Sandor Kruk, Chris J. Lintott, Kameswara Mantha, Devina Mohan, David O'Ryan, Inigo V. Slijepevic
0
0
We present the first systematic investigation of supervised scaling laws outside of an ImageNet-like context - on images of galaxies. We use 840k galaxy images and over 100M annotations by Galaxy Zoo volunteers, comparable in scale to Imagenet-1K. We find that adding annotated galaxy images provides a power law improvement in performance across all architectures and all tasks, while adding trainable parameters is effective only for some (typically more subjectively challenging) tasks. We then compare the downstream performance of finetuned models pretrained on either ImageNet-12k alone vs. additionally pretrained on our galaxy images. We achieve an average relative error rate reduction of 31% across 5 downstream tasks of scientific interest. Our finetuned models are more label-efficient and, unlike their ImageNet-12k-pretrained equivalents, often achieve linear transfer performance equal to that of end-to-end finetuning. We find relatively modest additional downstream benefits from scaling model size, implying that scaling alone is not sufficient to address our domain gap, and suggest that practitioners with qualitatively different images might benefit more from in-domain adaption followed by targeted downstream labelling.
4/5/2024
šø
Scaling Law for Time Series Forecasting
Jingzhe Shi, Qinwei Ma, Huan Ma, Lei Li
0
0
Scaling law that rewards large datasets, complex models and enhanced data granularity has been observed in various fields of deep learning. Yet, studies on time series forecasting have cast doubt on scaling behaviors of deep learning methods for time series forecasting: while more training data improves performance, more capable models do not always outperform less capable models, and longer input horizons may hurt performance for some models. We propose a theory for scaling law for time series forecasting that can explain these seemingly abnormal behaviors. We take into account the impact of dataset size and model complexity, as well as time series data granularity, particularly focusing on the look-back horizon, an aspect that has been unexplored in previous theories. Furthermore, we empirically evaluate various models using a diverse set of time series forecasting datasets, which (1) verifies the validity of scaling law on dataset size and model complexity within the realm of time series forecasting, and (2) validates our theoretical framework, particularly regarding the influence of look back horizon. We hope our findings may inspire new models targeting time series forecasting datasets of limited size, as well as large foundational datasets and models for time series forecasting in future works.footnote{Codes for our experiments will be made public at: url{https://github.com/JingzheShi/ScalingLawForTimeSeriesForecasting}.
5/28/2024