Scenarios and Approaches for Situated Natural Language Explanations
2406.05035
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) can be used to generate natural language explanations (NLE) that are adapted to different users' situations. However, there is yet to be a quantitative evaluation of the extent of such adaptation. To bridge this gap, we collect a benchmarking dataset, Situation-Based Explanation. This dataset contains 100 explanandums. Each explanandum is paired with explanations targeted at three distinct audience types-such as educators, students, and professionals-enabling us to assess how well the explanations meet the specific informational needs and contexts of these diverse groups e.g. students, teachers, and parents. For each explanandum paired with an audience situation, we include a human-written explanation. These allow us to compute scores that quantify how the LLMs adapt the explanations to the situations. On an array of pretrained language models with varying sizes, we examine three categories of prompting methods: rule-based prompting, meta-prompting, and in-context learning prompting. We find that 1) language models can generate prompts that result in explanations more precisely aligned with the target situations, 2) explicitly modeling an assistant persona by prompting You are a helpful assistant... is not a necessary prompt technique for situated NLE tasks, and 3) the in-context learning prompts only can help LLMs learn the demonstration template but can't improve their inference performance. SBE and our analysis facilitate future research towards generating situated natural language explanations.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores different scenarios and approaches for situated natural language explanations, which involve providing explanations of AI systems' behaviors in the context of specific situations or environments.
- The authors discuss the potential benefits of situated explanations, such as improved user understanding and trust, as well as the technical challenges involved in generating such explanations.
- The paper reviews related work in areas like explainable AI, situated dialogue, and language model-based explanations.
- The authors propose several scenarios and approaches for situated natural language explanations, and discuss the potential advantages and limitations of each.
Plain English Explanation
This paper looks at different ways that AI systems could provide explanations of their behaviors in the context of specific situations or environments. The researchers believe that these "situated" explanations could help users better understand and trust the AI systems they interact with.
For example, imagine an AI assistant that's helping you cook a recipe. Instead of just giving you step-by-step instructions, the AI could also explain why it's recommending certain ingredients or cooking techniques based on the current state of your kitchen and the recipes you've used before. This could make the AI's actions more transparent and give you more confidence in following its guidance.
The paper reviews some related work in areas like explainable AI, which looks at ways to make AI systems more interpretable, and situated dialogue, which involves AI systems having more contextual conversations. The authors then propose several specific scenarios and approaches for providing situated natural language explanations.
Overall, the goal is to make AI systems' decision-making and behavior more understandable to the people using them, which could lead to increased trust and better collaboration between humans and machines.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores different scenarios and approaches for situated natural language explanations, which involve providing explanations of AI systems' behaviors in the context of specific situations or environments.
The authors first review related work in areas like explainable AI, where researchers have looked at ways to make AI systems more interpretable to users. They also discuss work on situated dialogue, which involves AI systems having more contextual conversations, and language model-based explanations, where large language models are used to generate natural language explanations.
Building on this prior research, the authors propose several scenarios for situated natural language explanations. For example, they describe a cooking assistant that could explain its recommendations for ingredients and techniques based on the user's kitchen setup and past cooking habits. They also suggest scenarios involving robots providing explanations of their actions in a home environment, or intelligent tutoring systems generating explanations tailored to a student's knowledge and learning context.
For each scenario, the authors discuss the potential benefits of situated explanations, such as improved user understanding and trust, as well as the technical challenges involved. These challenges include accurately modeling the current situation, generating coherent and relevant explanations, and adapting the explanations to the user's level of understanding.
The paper also outlines various approaches the authors believe could be used to address these challenges, such as leveraging large language models, integrating multimodal sensors, and incorporating user modeling and adaptation techniques.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful exploration of the potential benefits and technical challenges of situated natural language explanations for AI systems. The authors make a compelling case for the value of these kinds of explanations in improving user understanding and trust, which are crucial for the widespread adoption and effective use of AI technologies.
That said, the paper also acknowledges several important limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors note that accurately modeling the relevant contextual factors in a given situation, and then generating coherent and relevant explanations based on that model, poses significant technical hurdles. Additionally, they highlight the need for more research on how to effectively adapt the explanations to the user's level of knowledge and understanding.
One potential issue the paper does not address in depth is the risk of situated explanations being used to obfuscate or mislead users about an AI system's true capabilities and limitations. There is a delicate balance to strike between providing useful, contextual explanations and avoiding over-simplification or outright deception.
Another area that could warrant further exploration is the potential societal impacts of widespread adoption of situated natural language explanations. For example, how might these explanations affect human-AI interaction and collaboration, and what implications might that have for the future of work and education?
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the growing body of research on explainable AI and human-AI interaction. By outlining a range of scenarios and approaches for situated natural language explanations, it provides a useful framework for continued exploration and development in this important area.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive exploration of the potential benefits and technical challenges associated with situated natural language explanations for AI systems. The authors make a compelling case for the value of these kinds of explanations in improving user understanding and trust, which are crucial for the widespread adoption and effective use of AI technologies.
The paper reviews relevant prior work in areas like explainable AI, situated dialogue, and language model-based explanations, and then proposes several specific scenarios and approaches for providing situated natural language explanations.
While the technical challenges involved are significant, the potential benefits of situated explanations, such as increased transparency and better human-AI collaboration, make this a promising area for continued research and development. The critical analysis highlights the need to consider potential risks and societal implications as this technology evolves.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of explainable AI and sets the stage for further exploration of how AI systems can provide more contextual and understandable explanations of their behaviors.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌿
Using Natural Language Explanations to Improve Robustness of In-context Learning
Xuanli He, Yuxiang Wu, Oana-Maria Camburu, Pasquale Minervini, Pontus Stenetorp
0
0
Recent studies demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) can excel in many tasks via in-context learning (ICL). However, recent works show that ICL-prompted models tend to produce inaccurate results when presented with adversarial inputs. In this work, we investigate whether augmenting ICL with natural language explanations (NLEs) improves the robustness of LLMs on adversarial datasets covering natural language inference and paraphrasing identification. We prompt LLMs with a small set of human-generated NLEs to produce further NLEs, yielding more accurate results than both a zero-shot-ICL setting and using only human-generated NLEs. Our results on five popular LLMs (GPT3.5-turbo, Llama2, Vicuna, Zephyr, and Mistral) show that our approach yields over 6% improvement over baseline approaches for eight adversarial datasets: HANS, ISCS, NaN, ST, PICD, PISP, ANLI, and PAWS. Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated that prompt selection strategies significantly enhance ICL on in-distribution test sets. However, our findings reveal that these strategies do not match the efficacy of our approach for robustness evaluations, resulting in an accuracy drop of 8% compared to the proposed approach.
5/21/2024
Large Language Model based Situational Dialogues for Second Language Learning
Shuyao Xu, Long Qin, Tianyang Chen, Zhenzhou Zha, Bingxue Qiu, Weizhi Wang
0
0
In second language learning, scenario-based conversation practice is important for language learners to achieve fluency in speaking, but students often lack sufficient opportunities to practice their conversational skills with qualified instructors or native speakers. To bridge this gap, we propose situational dialogue models for students to engage in conversational practice. Our situational dialogue models are fine-tuned on large language models (LLMs), with the aim of combining the engaging nature of an open-ended conversation with the focused practice of scenario-based tasks. Leveraging the generalization capabilities of LLMs, we demonstrate that our situational dialogue models perform effectively not only on training topics but also on topics not encountered during training. This offers a promising solution to support a wide range of conversational topics without extensive manual work. Additionally, research in the field of dialogue systems still lacks reliable automatic evaluation metrics, leading to human evaluation as the gold standard (Smith et al., 2022), which is typically expensive. To address the limitations of existing evaluation methods, we present a novel automatic evaluation method that employs fine-tuned LLMs to efficiently and effectively assess the performance of situational dialogue models.
4/1/2024
💬
Large Language Models are In-context Teachers for Knowledge Reasoning
Jiachen Zhao, Zonghai Yao, Zhichao Yang, Hong Yu
0
0
Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting teaches large language models (LLMs) in context to reason over queries that require more than mere information retrieval. However, human experts are usually required to craft demonstrations for in-context learning (ICL), which is expensive and has high variance. More importantly, how to craft helpful reasoning exemplars for ICL remains unclear. In this work, we investigate whether LLMs can be better in-context teachers for knowledge reasoning. We follow the ``encoding specificity'' hypothesis in human's memory retrieval to assume in-context exemplars at inference should match the encoding context in training data. We are thus motivated to propose Self-Explain to use one LLM's self-elicited explanations as in-context demonstrations for prompting it as they are generalized from the model's training examples. Self-Explain is shown to significantly outperform using human-crafted exemplars and other baselines. We further reveal that for in-context teaching, rationales by distinct teacher LLMs or human experts that more resemble the student LLM's self-explanations are better demonstrations, which supports our encoding specificity hypothesis. We then propose Teach-Back that aligns the teacher LLM with the student to enhance the in-context teaching performance. For example, Teach-Back enables a 7B model to teach the much larger GPT-3.5 in context, surpassing human teachers by around 5% in test accuracy on medical question answering.
6/18/2024
🌿
Verification and Refinement of Natural Language Explanations through LLM-Symbolic Theorem Proving
Xin Quan, Marco Valentino, Louise A. Dennis, Andr'e Freitas
0
0
Natural language explanations have become a proxy for evaluating explainable and multi-step Natural Language Inference (NLI) models. However, assessing the validity of explanations for NLI is challenging as it typically involves the crowd-sourcing of apposite datasets, a process that is time-consuming and prone to logical errors. To address existing limitations, this paper investigates the verification and refinement of natural language explanations through the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Theorem Provers (TPs). Specifically, we present a neuro-symbolic framework, named Explanation-Refiner, that augments a TP with LLMs to generate and formalise explanatory sentences and suggest potential inference strategies for NLI. In turn, the TP is employed to provide formal guarantees on the logical validity of the explanations and to generate feedback for subsequent improvements. We demonstrate how Explanation-Refiner can be jointly used to evaluate explanatory reasoning, autoformalisation, and error correction mechanisms of state-of-the-art LLMs as well as to automatically enhance the quality of human-annotated explanations of variable complexity in different domains.
5/9/2024