Using Natural Language Explanations to Improve Robustness of In-context Learning
2311.07556
0
0
🌿
Abstract
Recent studies demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) can excel in many tasks via in-context learning (ICL). However, recent works show that ICL-prompted models tend to produce inaccurate results when presented with adversarial inputs. In this work, we investigate whether augmenting ICL with natural language explanations (NLEs) improves the robustness of LLMs on adversarial datasets covering natural language inference and paraphrasing identification. We prompt LLMs with a small set of human-generated NLEs to produce further NLEs, yielding more accurate results than both a zero-shot-ICL setting and using only human-generated NLEs. Our results on five popular LLMs (GPT3.5-turbo, Llama2, Vicuna, Zephyr, and Mistral) show that our approach yields over 6% improvement over baseline approaches for eight adversarial datasets: HANS, ISCS, NaN, ST, PICD, PISP, ANLI, and PAWS. Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated that prompt selection strategies significantly enhance ICL on in-distribution test sets. However, our findings reveal that these strategies do not match the efficacy of our approach for robustness evaluations, resulting in an accuracy drop of 8% compared to the proposed approach.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) can perform well on many tasks through in-context learning (ICL)
- However, recent studies show that ICL-prompted LLMs can produce inaccurate results when presented with adversarial inputs
- This paper investigates whether augmenting ICL with natural language explanations (NLEs) can improve the robustness of LLMs on adversarial datasets
Plain English Explanation
Large language models, which are powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text, have shown impressive abilities to perform a wide variety of tasks by simply being provided with a few examples or instructions (a process called in-context learning). However, recent research has discovered that these models can struggle when faced with carefully crafted "adversarial" inputs designed to trick them.
In this study, the researchers explored whether having the language models generate their own natural language explanations, in addition to just providing examples, could make them more robust to these adversarial situations. The idea is that by forcing the models to not just produce an answer, but also explain their reasoning, they may become less susceptible to being mislead.
The researchers tested this approach on five popular large language models, across a range of adversarial datasets covering tasks like natural language inference and paraphrasing identification. Their results showed that prompting the models to generate explanations alongside their answers led to over 6% improvement in accuracy compared to baseline approaches. This suggests that this "explainable in-context learning" strategy could be an effective way to make language models more reliable and trustworthy, especially in sensitive or high-stakes applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates whether augmenting in-context learning (ICL) of large language models (LLMs) with natural language explanations (NLEs) can improve their robustness against adversarial inputs.
The authors prompt five popular LLMs (GPT3.5-turbo, Llama2, Vicuna, Zephyr, and Mistral) with a small set of human-generated NLEs, and have the models produce additional NLEs to accompany their outputs. They evaluate this "NLE-augmented ICL" approach on eight adversarial datasets covering tasks like natural language inference and paraphrasing identification.
The results show that the NLE-augmented ICL approach yields over 6% improvement in accuracy compared to both a zero-shot ICL setting and using only human-generated NLEs. This suggests that forcing LLMs to provide explanations alongside their predictions can make them more robust to adversarial inputs.
The paper also notes that while prior work has shown that prompt engineering strategies can enhance ICL performance on in-distribution test sets, these strategies do not provide the same level of robustness as the NLE-augmented approach, resulting in an 8% accuracy drop compared to the proposed method.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to improving the robustness of large language models, an important challenge as these models become more widely deployed. The use of natural language explanations is an intriguing idea, as it aligns with the broader push for more interpretable and transparent AI systems.
However, the paper does not deeply explore the limitations or potential downsides of this approach. For example, it's unclear how scalable and practical it would be to have language models generate high-quality explanations for a wide range of tasks and inputs. There may also be concerns around the reliability and consistency of these generated explanations.
Additionally, the paper only evaluates the approach on a limited set of adversarial datasets. Further research would be needed to understand how it generalizes to other types of adversarial attacks or real-world, high-stakes applications.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward, but there are still many open questions and potential pitfalls that warrant careful consideration as this line of research progresses.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that augmenting in-context learning of large language models with natural language explanations can significantly improve their robustness to adversarial inputs. By forcing the models to not just produce an answer, but also explain their reasoning, the researchers were able to achieve over 6% higher accuracy compared to baseline approaches on a range of adversarial datasets.
These findings suggest that "explainable in-context learning" could be a promising direction for making language models more reliable and trustworthy, particularly in sensitive applications where mistakes could have serious consequences. However, further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and scalability of this approach.
As large language models become more prevalent, developing techniques to ensure their robustness and transparency will be crucial. This paper provides an important contribution to this ongoing effort to make AI systems more reliable and aligned with human values.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Hint-enhanced In-Context Learning wakes Large Language Models up for knowledge-intensive tasks
Yifan Wang, Qingyan Guo, Xinzhe Ni, Chufan Shi, Lemao Liu, Haiyun Jiang, Yujiu Yang
0
0
In-context learning (ICL) ability has emerged with the increasing scale of large language models (LLMs), enabling them to learn input-label mappings from demonstrations and perform well on downstream tasks. However, under the standard ICL setting, LLMs may sometimes neglect query-related information in demonstrations, leading to incorrect predictions. To address this limitation, we propose a new paradigm called Hint-enhanced In-Context Learning (HICL) to explore the power of ICL in open-domain question answering, an important form in knowledge-intensive tasks. HICL leverages LLMs' reasoning ability to extract query-related knowledge from demonstrations, then concatenates the knowledge to prompt LLMs in a more explicit way. Furthermore, we track the source of this knowledge to identify specific examples, and introduce a Hint-related Example Retriever (HER) to select informative examples for enhanced demonstrations. We evaluate HICL with HER on 3 open-domain QA benchmarks, and observe average performance gains of 2.89 EM score and 2.52 F1 score on gpt-3.5-turbo, 7.62 EM score and 7.27 F1 score on LLaMA-2-Chat-7B compared with standard setting.
4/19/2024
Scenarios and Approaches for Situated Natural Language Explanations
Pengshuo Qiu, Frank Rudzicz, Zining Zhu
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) can be used to generate natural language explanations (NLE) that are adapted to different users' situations. However, there is yet to be a quantitative evaluation of the extent of such adaptation. To bridge this gap, we collect a benchmarking dataset, Situation-Based Explanation. This dataset contains 100 explanandums. Each explanandum is paired with explanations targeted at three distinct audience types-such as educators, students, and professionals-enabling us to assess how well the explanations meet the specific informational needs and contexts of these diverse groups e.g. students, teachers, and parents. For each explanandum paired with an audience situation, we include a human-written explanation. These allow us to compute scores that quantify how the LLMs adapt the explanations to the situations. On an array of pretrained language models with varying sizes, we examine three categories of prompting methods: rule-based prompting, meta-prompting, and in-context learning prompting. We find that 1) language models can generate prompts that result in explanations more precisely aligned with the target situations, 2) explicitly modeling an assistant persona by prompting You are a helpful assistant... is not a necessary prompt technique for situated NLE tasks, and 3) the in-context learning prompts only can help LLMs learn the demonstration template but can't improve their inference performance. SBE and our analysis facilitate future research towards generating situated natural language explanations.
6/10/2024
🌿
A Survey on In-context Learning
Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Lei Li, Zhifang Sui
0
0
With the increasing capabilities of large language models (LLMs), in-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a new paradigm for natural language processing (NLP), where LLMs make predictions based on contexts augmented with a few examples. It has been a significant trend to explore ICL to evaluate and extrapolate the ability of LLMs. In this paper, we aim to survey and summarize the progress and challenges of ICL. We first present a formal definition of ICL and clarify its correlation to related studies. Then, we organize and discuss advanced techniques, including training strategies, prompt designing strategies, and related analysis. Additionally, we explore various ICL application scenarios, such as data engineering and knowledge updating. Finally, we address the challenges of ICL and suggest potential directions for further research. We hope that our work can encourage more research on uncovering how ICL works and improving ICL.
6/19/2024
💬
Hijacking Large Language Models via Adversarial In-Context Learning
Yao Qiang, Xiangyu Zhou, Dongxiao Zhu
0
0
In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm leveraging LLMs for specific downstream tasks by utilizing labeled examples as demonstrations (demos) in the precondition prompts. Despite its promising performance, ICL suffers from instability with the choice and arrangement of examples. Additionally, crafted adversarial attacks pose a notable threat to the robustness of ICL. However, existing attacks are either easy to detect, rely on external models, or lack specificity towards ICL. This work introduces a novel transferable attack against ICL to address these issues, aiming to hijack LLMs to generate the target response or jailbreak. Our hijacking attack leverages a gradient-based prompt search method to learn and append imperceptible adversarial suffixes to the in-context demos without directly contaminating the user queries. Comprehensive experimental results across different generation and jailbreaking tasks highlight the effectiveness of our hijacking attack, resulting in distracted attention towards adversarial tokens and consequently leading to unwanted target outputs. We also propose a defense strategy against hijacking attacks through the use of extra clean demos, which enhances the robustness of LLMs during ICL. Broadly, this work reveals the significant security vulnerabilities of LLMs and emphasizes the necessity for in-depth studies on their robustness.
6/18/2024