Selective Vision is the Challenge for Visual Reasoning: A Benchmark for Visual Argument Understanding
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new benchmark for evaluating visual reasoning capabilities, called the "Selective Vision is the Challenge for Visual Argument Understanding" (SVVA) dataset.
- The dataset consists of images paired with arguments that require reasoning about the relevant parts of the image to evaluate the validity of the argument.
- The paper's primary contribution is the SVVA dataset, which is designed to test a machine's ability to selectively focus on relevant visual information to understand arguments.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new dataset that assesses a machine's ability to visually comprehend arguments. When we make arguments, we often rely on specific details in an image to support our points. The SVVA dataset challenges machines to identify the relevant parts of an image that are necessary to evaluate the validity of a given argument.
For example, an argument might be "The person in the image is wearing a red shirt." To assess the validity of this argument, a machine would need to locate the person in the image and determine the color of their shirt. The SVVA dataset tests a machine's ability to focus on the contextually relevant information to understand the argument, rather than just recognizing general objects in the image.
This type of visual reasoning is an important capability for AI systems to possess, as it allows them to comprehend arguments and make logical inferences based on visual information.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the "Selective Vision is the Challenge for Visual Argument Understanding" (SVVA) dataset, which is designed to assess a machine's ability to selectively focus on relevant visual information to understand arguments. The dataset consists of images paired with arguments that require reasoning about specific details in the image to evaluate the validity of the argument.
The dataset was constructed by first collecting a large pool of images and arguments. The images were carefully curated to contain both relevant and irrelevant visual information, and the arguments were designed to target specific details in the images. Crowdsourcing was used to validate the relevance of the image-argument pairs and ensure that the arguments could not be answered without considering the visual information.
The paper also presents a series of baseline experiments using state-of-the-art vision-language models. The results demonstrate that these models struggle to consistently identify the relevant visual information needed to accurately evaluate the arguments, highlighting the challenge of "selective vision" posed by the SVVA dataset.
Critical Analysis
The SVVA dataset represents an important step forward in benchmarking the visual reasoning capabilities of AI systems. By focusing on the ability to selectively attend to relevant visual information, the dataset addresses a key limitation of many existing vision-language benchmarks, which often rely on more straightforward associations between images and text.
However, the paper acknowledges several limitations of the SVVA dataset. First, the dataset is limited in size and may not capture the full diversity of visual arguments that exist in the real world. Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the types of errors made by the baseline models, which could offer valuable insights into the specific challenges of visual argument understanding.
Furthermore, the paper does not discuss the potential biases or representation issues that may be present in the dataset, which is an important consideration for any benchmark designed to evaluate the capabilities of AI systems. Future research could explore these issues and investigate ways to address them.
Conclusion
Overall, the "Selective Vision is the Challenge for Visual Argument Understanding" (SVVA) dataset represents a valuable contribution to the field of visual reasoning. By focusing on the ability to selectively attend to relevant visual information, the dataset provides a more nuanced and challenging benchmark for assessing the capabilities of AI systems. The baseline results presented in the paper highlight the significant challenges that remain in this area, underscoring the need for continued research and innovation in the field of language-vision integration.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Selective Vision is the Challenge for Visual Reasoning: A Benchmark for Visual Argument Understanding
Jiwan Chung, Sungjae Lee, Minseo Kim, Seungju Han, Ashkan Yousefpour, Jack Hessel, Youngjae Yu
Visual arguments, often used in advertising or social causes, rely on images to persuade viewers to do or believe something. Understanding these arguments requires selective vision: only specific visual stimuli within an image are relevant to the argument, and relevance can only be understood within the context of a broader argumentative structure. While visual arguments are readily appreciated by human audiences, we ask: are today's AI capable of similar understanding? We collect and release VisArgs, an annotated corpus designed to make explicit the (usually implicit) structures underlying visual arguments. VisArgs includes 1,611 images accompanied by three types of textual annotations: 5,112 visual premises (with region annotations), 5,574 commonsense premises, and reasoning trees connecting them to a broader argument. We propose three tasks over VisArgs to probe machine capacity for visual argument understanding: localization of premises, identification of premises, and deduction of conclusions. Experiments demonstrate that 1) machines cannot fully identify the relevant visual cues. The top-performing model, GPT-4-O, achieved an accuracy of only 78.5%, whereas humans reached 98.0%. All models showed a performance drop, with an average decrease in accuracy of 19.5%, when the comparison set was changed from objects outside the image to irrelevant objects within the image. Furthermore, 2) this limitation is the greatest factor impacting their performance in understanding visual arguments. Most models improved the most when given relevant visual premises as additional inputs, compared to other inputs, for deducing the conclusion of the visual argument.
Read more6/28/2024
0
NTSEBENCH: Cognitive Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models
Pranshu Pandya, Agney S Talwarr, Vatsal Gupta, Tushar Kataria, Vivek Gupta, Dan Roth
Cognitive textual and visual reasoning tasks, such as puzzles, series, and analogies, demand the ability to quickly reason, decipher, and evaluate patterns both textually and spatially. While LLMs and VLMs, through extensive training on large amounts of human-curated data, have attained a high level of pseudo-human intelligence in some common sense reasoning tasks, they still struggle with more complex reasoning tasks that require cognitive understanding. In this work, we introduce a new dataset, NTSEBench, designed to evaluate the cognitive multi-modal reasoning and problem-solving skills of large models. The dataset comprises 2,728 multiple-choice questions comprising of a total of 4,642 images across 26 categories sampled from the NTSE examination conducted nationwide in India, featuring both visual and textual general aptitude questions that do not rely on rote learning. We establish baselines on the dataset using state-of-the-art LLMs and VLMs. To facilitate a comparison between open source and propriety models, we propose four distinct modeling strategies to handle different modalities (text and images) in the dataset instances.
Read more7/16/2024
0
Zero-Shot Visual Reasoning by Vision-Language Models: Benchmarking and Analysis
Aishik Nagar, Shantanu Jaiswal, Cheston Tan
Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown impressive zero- and few-shot performance on real-world visual question answering (VQA) benchmarks, alluding to their capabilities as visual reasoning engines. However, the benchmarks being used conflate pure visual reasoning with world knowledge, and also have questions that involve a limited number of reasoning steps. Thus, it remains unclear whether a VLM's apparent visual reasoning performance is due to its world knowledge, or due to actual visual reasoning capabilities. To clarify this ambiguity, we systematically benchmark and dissect the zero-shot visual reasoning capabilities of VLMs through synthetic datasets that require minimal world knowledge, and allow for analysis over a broad range of reasoning steps. We focus on two novel aspects of zero-shot visual reasoning: i) evaluating the impact of conveying scene information as either visual embeddings or purely textual scene descriptions to the underlying large language model (LLM) of the VLM, and ii) comparing the effectiveness of chain-of-thought prompting to standard prompting for zero-shot visual reasoning. We find that the underlying LLMs, when provided textual scene descriptions, consistently perform better compared to being provided visual embeddings. In particular, 18% higher accuracy is achieved on the PTR dataset. We also find that CoT prompting performs marginally better than standard prompting only for the comparatively large GPT-3.5-Turbo (175B) model, and does worse for smaller-scale models. This suggests the emergence of CoT abilities for visual reasoning in LLMs at larger scales even when world knowledge is limited. Overall, we find limitations in the abilities of VLMs and LLMs for more complex visual reasoning, and highlight the important role that LLMs can play in visual reasoning.
Read more9/4/2024
0
What is the Visual Cognition Gap between Humans and Multimodal LLMs?
Xu Cao, Bolin Lai, Wenqian Ye, Yunsheng Ma, Joerg Heintz, Jintai Chen, Jianguo Cao, James M. Rehg
Recently, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown great promise in language-guided perceptual tasks such as recognition, segmentation, and object detection. However, their effectiveness in addressing visual cognition problems that require high-level reasoning is not well-established. One such challenge is abstract visual reasoning (AVR) -- the cognitive ability to discern relationships among patterns in a set of images and extrapolate to predict subsequent patterns. This skill is crucial during the early neurodevelopmental stages of children. Inspired by the AVR tasks in Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC), we propose a new dataset MaRs-VQA and a new benchmark VCog-Bench containing three datasets to evaluate the zero-shot AVR capability of MLLMs and compare their performance with existing human intelligent investigation. Our comparative experiments with different open-source and closed-source MLLMs on the VCog-Bench revealed a gap between MLLMs and human intelligence, highlighting the visual cognitive limitations of current MLLMs. We believe that the public release of VCog-Bench, consisting of MaRs-VQA, and the inference pipeline will drive progress toward the next generation of MLLMs with human-like visual cognition abilities.
Read more6/18/2024