SemCoder: Training Code Language Models with Comprehensive Semantics
2406.01006
0
0
🏋️
Abstract
Code Large Language Models (Code LLMs) have excelled at tasks like code completion but often miss deeper semantics such as execution effects and dynamic states. This paper aims to bridge the gap between Code LLMs' reliance on static text data and the need for thorough semantic understanding for complex tasks like debugging and program repair. We introduce a novel strategy to train Code LLMs with comprehensive semantics, encompassing high-level functional descriptions, local execution effects of individual statements, and overall input/output behavior, thereby linking static code text with dynamic execution states. We begin by collecting PyX, a clean code corpus of fully executable samples with functional descriptions and execution tracing. We propose training Code LLMs to write code and represent and reason about execution behaviors using natural language, mimicking human verbal debugging. This approach led to the development of SemCoder, a Code LLM with only 6.7B parameters, which shows competitive performance with GPT-3.5-turbo on code generation and execution reasoning tasks. SemCoder achieves 81.1% on HumanEval (GPT-3.5-turbo: 76.8%) and 54.5% on CRUXEval-I (GPT-3.5-turbo: 50.3%). We also study the effectiveness of SemCoder's monologue-style execution reasoning compared to concrete scratchpad reasoning, showing that our approach integrates semantics from multiple dimensions more smoothly. Finally, we demonstrate the potential of applying learned semantics to improve Code LLMs' debugging and self-refining capabilities.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Researchers aim to improve code-generation large language models (Code LLMs) by training them to understand not just static code text, but also the dynamic execution behaviors and semantics.
- They introduce a novel strategy to train Code LLMs with comprehensive semantics, including high-level functional descriptions, local execution effects, and input/output behavior.
- This approach led to the development of SemCoder, a Code LLM that outperforms GPT-3.5-turbo on code generation and execution reasoning tasks.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models like GPT-3 have become incredibly skilled at tasks like code completion, which involves predicting the next token in a piece of code. However, these models often struggle to grasp the deeper semantics of code, such as how it will execute and affect the overall system state.
This research aims to bridge that gap by training Code LLMs to not just generate code, but also understand and reason about its dynamic execution behaviors. The key idea is to provide the model with additional information beyond just the static code text, such as high-level functional descriptions, the local effects of individual code statements, and the overall input/output behavior.
By training the model to write code and also represent and reason about its execution in natural language, the researchers hope to mimic the way humans verbally debug code. This should lead to Code LLMs with a more comprehensive semantic understanding, which could be especially helpful for tasks like debugging and program repair.
The researchers developed a dataset called PyX, which contains fully executable code samples paired with functional descriptions and execution traces. They then used this data to train a new Code LLM called SemCoder, which outperformed the powerful GPT-3.5-turbo model on both code generation and execution reasoning benchmarks.
Interestingly, the researchers also found that SemCoder's "monologue-style" execution reasoning, where it explains the code's behavior in natural language, was more effective than just providing a concrete scratchpad of the execution state. This suggests that integrating semantics from multiple dimensions can lead to more robust and coherent understanding.
Overall, this research represents an important step towards developing Code LLMs that can truly comprehend the meaning and effects of code, rather than just manipulating text. This could have far-reaching implications for improving the capabilities of large language models and advancing program generation and reasoning beyond what is possible with current approaches.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the training strategy used to imbue Code LLMs with comprehensive semantics. Rather than relying solely on static code text, the researchers collect a dataset called PyX that includes:
- Fully executable code samples
- Functional descriptions of the code's purpose
- Execution traces that capture the local effects of individual statements and the overall input/output behavior
The researchers then train their Code LLM, called SemCoder, to not only generate code but also represent and reason about its execution in natural language. This mimics the way humans verbally debug code, linking the static code text to its dynamic execution states.
Experiments show that this approach leads to significant performance gains. SemCoder, a relatively small model with only 6.7B parameters, outperforms the much larger GPT-3.5-turbo on both code generation (81.1% vs. 76.8% on HumanEval) and execution reasoning (54.5% vs. 50.3% on CRUXEval-I) tasks.
The researchers also explore the effectiveness of SemCoder's monologue-style execution reasoning compared to providing a concrete scratchpad of the execution state. They find that the monologue approach, where the model explains the code's behavior in natural language, integrates semantics from multiple dimensions more smoothly, leading to better performance.
Finally, the paper discusses the potential of applying the learned semantics to improve Code LLMs' debugging and self-refining capabilities. By understanding the execution effects and behaviors of code, these models could become more adept at identifying and fixing bugs, as well as iteratively improving their own code-generation abilities.
Critical Analysis
While this research represents an important advance in Code LLM capabilities, the paper does acknowledge some limitations and areas for further work.
One key challenge is the scalability of the training approach. Collecting and curating the PyX dataset, which includes executable code, functional descriptions, and execution traces, is a labor-intensive process. Scaling this to larger and more diverse code corpora may be difficult.
Additionally, the paper does not extensively explore the generalization capabilities of SemCoder. It would be valuable to see how well the model performs on a wider range of code generation and reasoning tasks, beyond the specific benchmarks used in the experiments.
Another potential issue is the reliance on natural language to represent execution behaviors. While this approach aims to mimic human debugging, it may not be the most efficient or optimal way to capture and reason about code semantics. Alternate approaches that leverage more formal, structured representations of code semantics could potentially lead to further improvements.
Finally, the paper does not delve into the potential societal implications of this research, such as the impact on software development workflows or the ethical considerations around AI-generated code. Frameworks like CodeMind may offer valuable guidance in this regard.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the quest to imbue Code LLMs with more comprehensive semantic understanding. By bridging the gap between static code text and dynamic execution behaviors, the researchers have opened up new avenues for improving the capabilities and trustworthiness of these powerful language models.
Conclusion
This research aims to advance the state of the art in code-generation large language models (Code LLMs) by training them to understand not just the static text of code, but also its dynamic execution behaviors and semantics.
The key innovation is a novel training strategy that provides Code LLMs with comprehensive information about code, including high-level functional descriptions, local execution effects, and overall input/output behavior. This allows the models to better represent and reason about code execution in natural language, mimicking the way humans verbally debug.
The result is SemCoder, a Code LLM that outperforms the powerful GPT-3.5-turbo model on both code generation and execution reasoning tasks. This research represents an important step towards developing Code LLMs with more robust and coherent semantic understanding, which could have far-reaching implications for improving large language model capabilities and advancing program generation and reasoning.
While the paper acknowledges some limitations and areas for further work, this research demonstrates the potential of training language models to deeply comprehend the meaning and effects of code, rather than just manipulating text. By bridging the gap between static and dynamic code semantics, the field is inching closer to AI systems that can truly understand and reason about software in ways that closely mirror human cognition.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
NExT: Teaching Large Language Models to Reason about Code Execution
Ansong Ni, Miltiadis Allamanis, Arman Cohan, Yinlin Deng, Kensen Shi, Charles Sutton, Pengcheng Yin
0
0
A fundamental skill among human developers is the ability to understand and reason about program execution. As an example, a programmer can mentally simulate code execution in natural language to debug and repair code (aka. rubber duck debugging). However, large language models (LLMs) of code are typically trained on the surface textual form of programs, thus may lack a semantic understanding of how programs execute at run-time. To address this issue, we propose NExT, a method to teach LLMs to inspect the execution traces of programs (variable states of executed lines) and reason about their run-time behavior through chain-of-thought (CoT) rationales. Specifically, NExT uses self-training to bootstrap a synthetic training set of execution-aware rationales that lead to correct task solutions (e.g., fixed programs) without laborious manual annotation. Experiments on program repair tasks based on MBPP and HumanEval demonstrate that NExT improves the fix rate of a PaLM 2 model, by 26.1% and 14.3% absolute, respectively, with significantly improved rationale quality as verified by automated metrics and human raters. Our model can also generalize to scenarios where program traces are absent at test-time.
4/24/2024
SynCode: LLM Generation with Grammar Augmentation
Shubham Ugare, Tarun Suresh, Hangoo Kang, Sasa Misailovic, Gagandeep Singh
0
0
LLMs are widely used in complex AI applications. These applications underscore the need for LLM outputs to adhere to a specific format, for their integration with other components in the systems. Typically the format rules e.g., for data serialization formats such as JSON, YAML, or Code in Programming Language are expressed as context-free grammar (CFG). Due to the hallucinations and unreliability of LLMs, instructing LLMs to adhere to specified syntax becomes an increasingly important challenge. We present SynCode, a novel framework for efficient and general syntactical decoding with LLMs, to address this challenge. SynCode leverages the CFG of a formal language, utilizing an offline-constructed efficient lookup table called DFA mask store based on the discrete finite automaton (DFA) of the language grammar terminals. We demonstrate SynCode's soundness and completeness given the CFG of the formal language, presenting its ability to retain syntactically valid tokens while rejecting invalid ones. SynCode seamlessly integrates with any language defined by CFG, as evidenced by experiments focusing on generating JSON, Python, and Go outputs. Our experiments evaluating the effectiveness of SynCode for JSON generation demonstrate that SynCode eliminates all syntax errors and significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Furthermore, our results underscore how SynCode significantly reduces 96.07% of syntax errors in generated Python and Go code, showcasing its substantial impact on enhancing syntactical precision in LLM generation. Our code is available at https://github.com/uiuc-focal-lab/syncode
4/30/2024
Learning to Reason via Program Generation, Emulation, and Search
Nathaniel Weir, Muhammad Khalifa, Linlu Qiu, Orion Weller, Peter Clark
0
0
Program synthesis with language models (LMs) has unlocked a large set of reasoning abilities; code-tuned LMs have proven adept at generating programs that solve a wide variety of algorithmic symbolic manipulation tasks (e.g. word concatenation). However, not all reasoning tasks are easily expressible as code, e.g. tasks involving commonsense reasoning, moral decision-making, and sarcasm understanding. Our goal is to extend an LM's program synthesis skills to such tasks and evaluate the results via pseudo-programs, namely Python programs where some leaf function calls are left undefined. To that end, we propose, Code Generation and Emulated EXecution (CoGEX). CoGEX works by (1) training LMs to generate their own pseudo-programs, (2) teaching them to emulate their generated program's execution, including those leaf functions, allowing the LM's knowledge to fill in the execution gaps; and (3) using them to search over many programs to find an optimal one. To adapt the CoGEX model to a new task, we introduce a method for performing program search to find a single program whose pseudo-execution yields optimal performance when applied to all the instances of a given dataset. We show that our approach yields large improvements compared to standard in-context learning approaches on a battery of tasks, both algorithmic and soft reasoning. This result thus demonstrates that code synthesis can be applied to a much broader class of problems than previously considered. Our released dataset, fine-tuned models, and implementation can be found at url{https://github.com/nweir127/CoGEX}.
5/30/2024
New!UniCoder: Scaling Code Large Language Model via Universal Code
Tao Sun, Linzheng Chai, Jian Yang, Yuwei Yin, Hongcheng Guo, Jiaheng Liu, Bing Wang, Liqun Yang, Zhoujun Li
0
0
Intermediate reasoning or acting steps have successfully improved large language models (LLMs) for handling various downstream natural language processing (NLP) tasks. When applying LLMs for code generation, recent works mainly focus on directing the models to articulate intermediate natural-language reasoning steps, as in chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting, and then output code with the natural language or other structured intermediate steps. However, such output is not suitable for code translation or generation tasks since the standard CoT has different logical structures and forms of expression with the code. In this work, we introduce the universal code (UniCode) as the intermediate representation. It is a description of algorithm steps using a mix of conventions of programming languages, such as assignment operator, conditional operator, and loop. Hence, we collect an instruction dataset UniCoder-Instruct to train our model UniCoder on multi-task learning objectives. UniCoder-Instruct comprises natural-language questions, code solutions, and the corresponding universal code. The alignment between the intermediate universal code representation and the final code solution significantly improves the quality of the generated code. The experimental results demonstrate that UniCoder with the universal code significantly outperforms the previous prompting methods by a large margin, showcasing the effectiveness of the structural clues in pseudo-code.
6/26/2024