SynCode: LLM Generation with Grammar Augmentation
2403.01632
0
0
Abstract
LLMs are widely used in complex AI applications. These applications underscore the need for LLM outputs to adhere to a specific format, for their integration with other components in the systems. Typically the format rules e.g., for data serialization formats such as JSON, YAML, or Code in Programming Language are expressed as context-free grammar (CFG). Due to the hallucinations and unreliability of LLMs, instructing LLMs to adhere to specified syntax becomes an increasingly important challenge. We present SynCode, a novel framework for efficient and general syntactical decoding with LLMs, to address this challenge. SynCode leverages the CFG of a formal language, utilizing an offline-constructed efficient lookup table called DFA mask store based on the discrete finite automaton (DFA) of the language grammar terminals. We demonstrate SynCode's soundness and completeness given the CFG of the formal language, presenting its ability to retain syntactically valid tokens while rejecting invalid ones. SynCode seamlessly integrates with any language defined by CFG, as evidenced by experiments focusing on generating JSON, Python, and Go outputs. Our experiments evaluating the effectiveness of SynCode for JSON generation demonstrate that SynCode eliminates all syntax errors and significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Furthermore, our results underscore how SynCode significantly reduces 96.07% of syntax errors in generated Python and Go code, showcasing its substantial impact on enhancing syntactical precision in LLM generation. Our code is available at https://github.com/uiuc-focal-lab/syncode
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Investigates methods to improve the code generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
- Proposes a grammar augmentation technique to guide LLMs towards generating syntactically correct code
- Evaluates the approach on various code generation tasks, demonstrating improved performance over existing methods
Plain English Explanation
Large language models, which are powerful artificial intelligence systems trained on vast amounts of text data, have shown promise in generating human-like text. However, when it comes to generating computer code, these models can sometimes produce code that has errors or doesn't follow the proper syntax rules. This can be a problem, as code needs to be syntactically correct in order to run correctly.
The researchers in this paper investigated ways to improve the code generation abilities of LLMs. They developed a technique called "grammar augmentation" which aims to guide the LLMs to generate code that adheres to the proper syntax rules. The idea is to provide the LLM with additional information about the structure of code, so that it can better understand how to generate code that is valid and runnable.
The researchers tested their grammar augmentation approach on various code generation tasks, such as generating functions or classes in different programming languages. They found that their method led to significant improvements in the quality and correctness of the generated code, compared to existing techniques. This suggests that incorporating syntactic knowledge can be a valuable way to enhance the code generation capabilities of large language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a grammar augmentation technique to improve the code generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The core idea is to provide the LLM with additional information about the structure of code, in the form of a context-free grammar (CFG), during the training process.
The researchers first trained an LLM (such as GPT-3) on a large corpus of code from open-source repositories. They then fine-tuned this pre-trained LLM using a dataset of code snippets annotated with their corresponding CFG rules. This allowed the LLM to learn the underlying syntactic structure of code, in addition to the semantic and contextual information it had already learned.
During inference, the LLM generates code token-by-token, while also predicting the corresponding CFG rule for each token. This "guided" generation process helps ensure that the output code adheres to the proper syntax, as defined by the provided grammar.
The researchers evaluated their grammar augmentation approach on several code generation tasks, including function and class generation, across multiple programming languages. They found that their method significantly outperformed baseline LLM-based approaches in terms of syntactic correctness and overall code quality.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to improving the code generation capabilities of large language models. The key strength of the grammar augmentation technique is that it explicitly incorporates syntactic knowledge, which is crucial for generating valid, executable code.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the approach. For example, the grammar rules used in the experiments were manually defined, which may not scale well to more complex or domain-specific programming languages. An interesting area for future research would be to investigate methods for automatically extracting or learning the relevant grammar rules from code data, rather than relying on manual curation.
Additionally, the paper focuses solely on syntactic correctness and does not consider other important aspects of code quality, such as readability, efficiency, or adherence to best practices. Integrating these additional code quality metrics into the evaluation and training process could further enhance the practical usefulness of the grammar augmentation technique.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel grammar augmentation approach to improve the code generation capabilities of large language models. By explicitly incorporating syntactic information into the training process, the researchers were able to significantly enhance the syntactic correctness and overall quality of the code generated by the LLMs.
The findings of this work suggest that incorporating domain-specific knowledge, such as programming language syntax, can be a valuable way to guide and constrain the output of powerful language models. This has important implications for the field of AI-assisted programming, where techniques like this could help make language models more reliable and trustworthy for tasks like code generation and code editing.
Overall, this research represents an important step towards developing more robust and verifiable text generation systems that can be effectively applied to technical domains like programming.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏋️
SemCoder: Training Code Language Models with Comprehensive Semantics
Yangruibo Ding, Jinjun Peng, Marcus J. Min, Gail Kaiser, Junfeng Yang, Baishakhi Ray
0
0
Code Large Language Models (Code LLMs) have excelled at tasks like code completion but often miss deeper semantics such as execution effects and dynamic states. This paper aims to bridge the gap between Code LLMs' reliance on static text data and the need for thorough semantic understanding for complex tasks like debugging and program repair. We introduce a novel strategy to train Code LLMs with comprehensive semantics, encompassing high-level functional descriptions, local execution effects of individual statements, and overall input/output behavior, thereby linking static code text with dynamic execution states. We begin by collecting PyX, a clean code corpus of fully executable samples with functional descriptions and execution tracing. We propose training Code LLMs to write code and represent and reason about execution behaviors using natural language, mimicking human verbal debugging. This approach led to the development of SemCoder, a Code LLM with only 6.7B parameters, which shows competitive performance with GPT-3.5-turbo on code generation and execution reasoning tasks. SemCoder achieves 81.1% on HumanEval (GPT-3.5-turbo: 76.8%) and 54.5% on CRUXEval-I (GPT-3.5-turbo: 50.3%). We also study the effectiveness of SemCoder's monologue-style execution reasoning compared to concrete scratchpad reasoning, showing that our approach integrates semantics from multiple dimensions more smoothly. Finally, we demonstrate the potential of applying learned semantics to improve Code LLMs' debugging and self-refining capabilities.
6/4/2024
HYSYNTH: Context-Free LLM Approximation for Guiding Program Synthesis
Shraddha Barke, Emmanuel Anaya Gonzalez, Saketh Ram Kasibatla, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Nadia Polikarpova
0
0
Many structured prediction and reasoning tasks can be framed as program synthesis problems, where the goal is to generate a program in a domain-specific language (DSL) that transforms input data into the desired output. Unfortunately, purely neural approaches, such as large language models (LLMs), often fail to produce fully correct programs in unfamiliar DSLs, while purely symbolic methods based on combinatorial search scale poorly to complex problems. Motivated by these limitations, we introduce a hybrid approach, where LLM completions for a given task are used to learn a task-specific, context-free surrogate model, which is then used to guide program synthesis. We evaluate this hybrid approach on three domains, and show that it outperforms both unguided search and direct sampling from LLMs, as well as existing program synthesizers.
5/28/2024
Uncovering LLM-Generated Code: A Zero-Shot Synthetic Code Detector via Code Rewriting
Tong Ye, Yangkai Du, Tengfei Ma, Lingfei Wu, Xuhong Zhang, Shouling Ji, Wenhai Wang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable proficiency in generating code. However, the misuse of LLM-generated (Synthetic) code has prompted concerns within both educational and industrial domains, highlighting the imperative need for the development of synthetic code detectors. Existing methods for detecting LLM-generated content are primarily tailored for general text and often struggle with code content due to the distinct grammatical structure of programming languages and massive low-entropy tokens. Building upon this, our work proposes a novel zero-shot synthetic code detector based on the similarity between the code and its rewritten variants. Our method relies on the intuition that the differences between the LLM-rewritten and original codes tend to be smaller when the original code is synthetic. We utilize self-supervised contrastive learning to train a code similarity model and assess our approach on two synthetic code detection benchmarks. Our results demonstrate a notable enhancement over existing synthetic content detectors designed for general texts, with an improvement of 20.5% in the APPS benchmark and 29.1% in the MBPP benchmark.
5/31/2024
💬
Constraining Large Language Model for Generating Computer-Parsable Content
Jiaye Wang
0
0
We propose a method to guide Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating structured content adhering to specific conventions without fine-tuning. By utilizing coroutine-based content generation constraints through a pre-agreed context-free grammar (CFG), LLMs are directed during decoding to produce formal language compliant outputs. This enhances stability and consistency in generating target data structures, types, or instructions, reducing application development complexities. Experimentally, error rates of GPT-2 and Gemma exceed 95% for DSLs longer than 36 and 282 tokens, respectively. We introduce YieldLang, a coroutine-based DSL generation framework, and evaluate it with LLMs on various tasks including JSON and Mermaid flowchart generation. Compared to benchmarks, our approach improves accuracy by 1.09 to 11.6 times, with LLMs requiring only about 16.5% of the samples to generate JSON effectively. This enhances usability of LLM-generated content for computer programs.
4/23/2024