Setting up the Data Printer with Improved English to Ukrainian Machine Translation

Overview

• To build large language models for Ukrainian, the researchers need to expand their data corpora with more examples of natural language tasks.
• They introduce a method to build a high-quality Ukrainian-English translation system using a large pretrained language model and noisy parallel datasets.
• Their Dragoman model outperforms previous state-of-the-art encoder-decoder models on a standard evaluation set.

Plain English Explanation

Building powerful language models for Ukrainian requires having a large and diverse dataset of examples. Since there is more readily available data in English, the researchers propose using a high-quality translation system to create Ukrainian datasets from existing English ones.

To build this translation system, they fine-tune a large pretrained language model on a noisy dataset of 3 million Ukrainian-English sentence pairs. They then do a second round of training on a smaller, higher-quality dataset of 17,000 examples, selected by filtering for the most relevant translations.

The resulting Dragoman model is a decoder-only architecture that outperforms previous encoder-decoder translation models on a standard evaluation set. This means it can translate Ukrainian to English more accurately than prior systems.

Technical Explanation

The researchers aim to expand the available data for training large Ukrainian language models. They propose leveraging the abundance of English language data by developing a high-quality Ukrainian-English translation system.

To build this translation system, they use a two-phase fine-tuning approach. First, they fine-tune a large pretrained language model on a noisy dataset of 3 million Ukrainian-English sentence pairs. Then, they do a second round of training on a smaller, higher-quality dataset of 17,000 examples, selected by k-fold perplexity filtering.

The resulting Dragoman model is a decoder-only architecture that outperforms previous encoder-decoder translation models on the FLORES devtest set, a standard evaluation benchmark.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their approach relies on a noisy parallel dataset, which could introduce translation errors or biases into the final model. They attempt to mitigate this by using a second, higher-quality dataset for further fine-tuning.

However, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the quality and biases present in the original dataset, nor does it quantify the improvement gained from the second fine-tuning phase. Further research could explore techniques to automatically assess and improve the quality of parallel datasets used for training translation models.

Additionally, the paper focuses solely on translation performance and does not address other potential use cases or limitations of the Dragoman model. Investigating its performance on additional tasks, such as text generation or classification, could further demonstrate its capabilities and limitations.

Conclusion

The researchers propose a method to build a high-quality Ukrainian-English translation system using a large pretrained language model and a two-phase fine-tuning approach. Their Dragoman model outperforms previous state-of-the-art translation systems, which could enable the creation of larger and more diverse datasets for training Ukrainian language models.

This research represents an important step towards expanding the capabilities of natural language processing for the Ukrainian language, with potential applications in areas such as machine translation, language generation, and text understanding.