A Setwise Approach for Effective and Highly Efficient Zero-shot Ranking with Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2310.09497 - Published 5/31/2024 by Shengyao Zhuang, Honglei Zhuang, Bevan Koopman, Guido Zuccon
Total Score

0

A Setwise Approach for Effective and Highly Efficient Zero-shot Ranking with Large Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

1. Introduction

This paper presents a novel "setwise" approach for effectively and efficiently performing zero-shot ranking with large language models (LLMs). Zero-shot ranking refers to the ability to rank a set of items without any prior training on the specific task. The key innovation of this work is the use of setwise prompting, which involves presenting the LLM with a set of items to be ranked, rather than just a single item at a time.

2. Background & Related Work

2.1. Pointwise prompting

Traditional approaches to zero-shot ranking with LLMs have used "pointwise" prompting, where the model is asked to evaluate each item individually. This can be inefficient, as the model may need to be queried multiple times to rank a set of items. PromptReps: Prompting Large Language Models to Represent and Reason about Structured Data and Generating Diverse Criteria to Fly to Improve Point-of-Interest Recommendation have explored ways to improve the efficiency of pointwise prompting, but the authors argue that a setwise approach can be even more effective.

2.2. Setwise prompting

In the setwise approach, the LLM is presented with a set of items to be ranked, along with a prompt that asks the model to order the set. This allows the model to consider the relative merits of the items within the set, potentially leading to more accurate and efficient rankings. The authors draw inspiration from prior work on Prediction-Powered Ranking with Large Language Models and ECORank: Budget-Constrained Text Re-Ranking Using Large Language Models, which have explored the use of setwise techniques for ranking.

Plain English Explanation

The key idea of this paper is to use a "setwise" approach for ranking items with large language models, rather than the traditional "pointwise" approach. In pointwise prompting, the model is asked to evaluate each item individually, which can be inefficient. In contrast, the setwise approach presents the model with a set of items to be ranked all at once. This allows the model to consider the relative merits of the items within the set, potentially leading to more accurate and efficient rankings.

The authors build on prior work that has explored setwise techniques for ranking, such as Prediction-Powered Ranking with Large Language Models and ECORank: Budget-Constrained Text Re-Ranking Using Large Language Models. The key innovation in this paper is the use of setwise prompting, which the authors argue can be more effective and efficient than the traditional pointwise approach.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a setwise approach for zero-shot ranking with large language models. In this approach, the LLM is presented with a set of items to be ranked, along with a prompt that asks the model to order the set. This allows the model to consider the relative merits of the items within the set, potentially leading to more accurate and efficient rankings.

The authors conduct experiments to compare the performance of the setwise approach to the traditional pointwise approach, using a variety of datasets and language models. They find that the setwise approach outperforms the pointwise approach in terms of ranking accuracy and efficiency, as measured by metrics such as Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG) and the number of model queries required.

The authors also propose a novel sorting algorithm that can be used to efficiently rank the items based on the LLM's outputs, further improving the efficiency of the setwise approach. They demonstrate the effectiveness of this sorting algorithm through additional experiments.

Critical Analysis

The authors present a compelling case for the use of setwise prompting in zero-shot ranking tasks with large language models. The experimental results suggest that this approach can lead to significant improvements in both ranking accuracy and efficiency compared to the traditional pointwise approach.

One potential limitation of the study is the use of a limited set of datasets and language models. While the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach across multiple domains, it would be valuable to see how it performs on a wider range of tasks and with a more diverse set of LLMs, including more recently developed models.

Additionally, the authors do not explore the potential limitations or failure modes of their setwise approach. It would be helpful to understand the types of tasks or datasets where the setwise approach may not be as effective, or to identify any potential biases or inconsistencies that could arise from the way the model is prompted.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of zero-shot ranking with large language models, and the setwise prompting approach presented here could have significant implications for a wide range of applications that rely on ranking and sorting tasks.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel "setwise" approach for performing zero-shot ranking with large language models. The key innovation is the use of setwise prompting, where the LLM is presented with a set of items to be ranked, rather than just a single item at a time. The authors demonstrate that this setwise approach can lead to significant improvements in both ranking accuracy and efficiency compared to the traditional pointwise approach.

The paper builds on prior work in setwise techniques for ranking, and the authors also propose a novel sorting algorithm to further enhance the efficiency of their approach. While the study has some limitations in terms of the breadth of datasets and language models explored, the results are promising and suggest that the setwise prompting approach could be a valuable tool for a wide range of ranking and sorting tasks in the future.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →