Shield Synthesis for LTL Modulo Theories
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a technique called "shield synthesis" for constructing safety monitors, known as "shields," that can protect systems from unsafe behavior while preserving as much of the original system's functionality as possible.
- The shields are designed to work with systems whose behaviors are specified using Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) modulo theories, a powerful formalism for describing complex system dynamics.
- The authors develop efficient algorithms for automatically synthesizing these shields and demonstrate their effectiveness on several real-world case studies, including a robotic navigation task and a text generation system.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new technique called "shield synthesis" that can help keep systems safe while still allowing them to function as intended. The key idea is to create a special "shield" that monitors the system's behavior and intervenes whenever the system is about to do something unsafe.
The shields are designed to work with systems whose behavior is described using a powerful mathematical language called "Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) modulo theories." This allows the shields to handle complex system dynamics, like those found in robotic navigation or text generation tasks.
The authors develop efficient algorithms to automatically generate these shields, and they demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several real-world examples. The shields are able to prevent unsafe behavior while still allowing the systems to do as much of their intended work as possible, which is an important goal in safe reinforcement learning and large language model safety.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the concept of "shield synthesis" for constructing safety monitors, called "shields," that can protect systems from unsafe behavior while preserving as much of the original system's functionality as possible. The shields are designed to work with systems whose behaviors are specified using Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) modulo theories, a powerful formalism for describing complex system dynamics.
The authors develop efficient algorithms for automatically synthesizing these shields. Their approach involves first translating the LTL modulo theories specification into a weighted automaton, then using this automaton to guide the synthesis of the shield. The shield is designed to intercept the system's inputs and outputs, monitoring them for potential safety violations and intervening only when necessary to prevent unsafe behavior.
The effectiveness of the shield synthesis technique is demonstrated on several real-world case studies, including a robotic navigation task and a text generation system. The results show that the shields are able to prevent unsafe behavior while still allowing the systems to accomplish a significant portion of their intended functionality.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for constructing safety monitors that can protect systems from unsafe behavior while preserving their core functionality. The use of LTL modulo theories as the specification language is a strength, as it allows for the handling of complex system dynamics that may not be easily captured by simpler formalisms.
However, the authors do acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the current shield synthesis algorithms may not scale well to very large or complex systems, and there are open questions around how to handle systems with nondeterministic or stochastic behaviors. Additionally, the authors note that the shields are designed to prevent "safety violations" but do not provide a formal definition of what constitutes a safety violation in their framework.
It would also be valuable to see more discussion of the potential pitfalls and failure modes of the shield synthesis approach, as well as how the shields might interact with other safety-critical AI systems or large language models. Nonetheless, the core ideas presented in the paper represent an important step forward in the quest for building safe and reliable AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel technique called "shield synthesis" for constructing safety monitors that can protect systems from unsafe behavior while preserving their core functionality. The shields are designed to work with systems whose behaviors are specified using the powerful Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) modulo theories formalism, allowing them to handle complex system dynamics.
The authors develop efficient algorithms for automatically synthesizing these shields and demonstrate their effectiveness on several real-world case studies, including robotic navigation and text generation tasks. This work represents an important step forward in the development of safe and reliable AI systems, and the ideas presented in the paper have the potential to be widely applicable across a range of safety-critical domains and large language model applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Shield Synthesis for LTL Modulo Theories
Andoni Rodriguez, Guy Amir, Davide Corsi, Cesar Sanchez, Guy Katz
In recent years, Machine Learning (ML) models have achieved remarkable success in various domains. However, these models also tend to demonstrate unsafe behaviors, precluding their deployment in safety-critical systems. To cope with this issue, ample research focuses on developing methods that guarantee the safe behaviour of a given ML model. A prominent example is shielding which incorporates an external component (a shield) that blocks unwanted behavior. Despite significant progress, shielding suffers from a main setback: it is currently geared towards properties encoded solely in propositional logics (e.g., LTL) and is unsuitable for richer logics. This, in turn, limits the widespread applicability of shielding in many real-world systems. In this work, we address this gap, and extend shielding to LTL modulo theories, by building upon recent advances in reactive synthesis modulo theories. This allowed us to develop a novel approach for generating shields conforming to complex safety specifications in these more expressive, logics. We evaluated our shields and demonstrate their ability to handle rich data with temporal dynamics. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first approach for synthesizing shields for such expressivity.
Read more6/7/2024
0
Predictable and Performant Reactive Synthesis Modulo Theories via Functional Synthesis
Andoni Rodr'iguez, Felipe Gorostiaga, C'esar S'anchez
Reactive synthesis is the process of generating correct controllers from temporal logic specifications. Classical LTL reactive synthesis handles (propositional) LTL as a specification language. Boolean abstractions allow reducing LTLt specifications (i.e., LTL with propositions replaced by literals from a theory calT), into equi-realizable LTL specifications. In this paper we extend these results into a full static synthesis procedure. The synthesized system receives from the environment valuations of variables from a rich theory calT and outputs valuations of system variables from calT. We use the abstraction method to synthesize a reactive Boolean controller from the LTL specification, and we combine it with functional synthesis to obtain a static controller for the original LTLt specification. We also show that our method allows responses in the sense that the controller can optimize its outputs in order to e.g., always provide the smallest safe values. This is the first full static synthesis method for LTLt, which is a deterministic program (hence predictable and efficient).
Read more7/15/2024
0
Efficient Shield Synthesis via State-Space Transformation
Asger Horn Brorholt, Andreas Holck H{o}eg-Petersen, Kim Guldstrand Larsen, Christian Schilling
We consider the problem of synthesizing safety strategies for control systems, also known as shields. Since the state space is infinite, shields are typically computed over a finite-state abstraction, with the most common abstraction being a rectangular grid. However, for many systems, such a grid does not align well with the safety property or the system dynamics. That is why a coarse grid is rarely sufficient, but a fine grid is typically computationally infeasible to obtain. In this paper, we show that appropriate state-space transformations can still allow to use a coarse grid at almost no computational overhead. We demonstrate in three case studies that our transformation-based synthesis outperforms a standard synthesis by several orders of magnitude. In the first two case studies, we use domain knowledge to select a suitable transformation. In the third case study, we instead report on results in engineering a transformation without domain knowledge.
Read more8/27/2024
0
Safety through Permissibility: Shield Construction for Fast and Safe Reinforcement Learning
Alexander Politowicz, Sahisnu Mazumder, Bing Liu
Designing Reinforcement Learning (RL) solutions for real-life problems remains a significant challenge. A major area of concern is safety. Shielding is a popular technique to enforce safety in RL by turning user-defined safety specifications into safe agent behavior. However, these methods either suffer from extreme learning delays, demand extensive human effort in designing models and safe domains in the problem, or require pre-computation. In this paper, we propose a new permissibility-based framework to deal with safety and shield construction. Permissibility was originally designed for eliminating (non-permissible) actions that will not lead to an optimal solution to improve RL training efficiency. This paper shows that safety can be naturally incorporated into this framework, i.e. extending permissibility to include safety, and thereby we can achieve both safety and improved efficiency. Experimental evaluation using three standard RL applications shows the effectiveness of the approach.
Read more5/31/2024