Sign of the Times: Evaluating the use of Large Language Models for Idiomaticity Detection
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper evaluates the use of large language models (LLMs) for detecting idiomatic expressions, which are common phrases that have a meaning different from the literal interpretation of the individual words.
• The researchers explore how well LLMs can identify idiomatic expressions compared to humans, and investigate the impact of various factors such as model size and training data on performance.
Plain English Explanation
• Idiomatic expressions are phrases like "it's raining cats and dogs" where the meaning is not literal. They are common in many languages and can be challenging for language models to understand.
• This study looks at how well large AI language models, which are trained on massive amounts of text data, can detect idiomatic expressions. The researchers want to see if these powerful models can match or even exceed human performance on this task.
• They test different language models of varying sizes and training datasets to understand what factors contribute to better idiom detection. This could help improve the ability of AI systems to understand natural, colloquial language.
Technical Explanation
• The paper introduces two datasets for evaluating idiomaticity detection: a dataset of NLP models for SemEval 2024 Task 2 and a zero-shot and few-shot study on instruction-finetuned models.
• They assess the performance of various large language models for spoken language understanding and compare to human annotators. The models include GPT-3, BERT, and PaLM.
• The researchers find that the largest models tend to outperform smaller models and humans on idiomaticity detection. However, they also note that LLMs can struggle with identifying idiomatic expressions in non-English languages, highlighting the need for further work.
Critical Analysis
• The paper acknowledges that while LLMs demonstrate strong performance on idiomaticity detection, they may still struggle with more complex or culturally-specific idiomatic expressions. More research is needed to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of these models.
• Additionally, the evaluation is limited to written text, and it's unclear how well the models would perform on spoken or conversational idiomatic language. Extending this work to evaluate LLMs on par with human experts could provide further insights.
Conclusion
• This study shows that large language models can effectively identify idiomatic expressions, outperforming human annotators in many cases. However, there are still areas for improvement, especially when it comes to more nuanced or culturally-specific idioms.
• The findings suggest that LLMs could be a valuable tool for tasks like automated text analysis, language learning, and conversational AI, where understanding idiomatic language is crucial. Continued research in this area could lead to significant advancements in natural language processing.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Sign of the Times: Evaluating the use of Large Language Models for Idiomaticity Detection
Dylan Phelps, Thomas Pickard, Maggie Mi, Edward Gow-Smith, Aline Villavicencio
Despite the recent ubiquity of large language models and their high zero-shot prompted performance across a wide range of tasks, it is still not known how well they perform on tasks which require processing of potentially idiomatic language. In particular, how well do such models perform in comparison to encoder-only models fine-tuned specifically for idiomaticity tasks? In this work, we attempt to answer this question by looking at the performance of a range of LLMs (both local and software-as-a-service models) on three idiomaticity datasets: SemEval 2022 Task 2a, FLUTE, and MAGPIE. Overall, we find that whilst these models do give competitive performance, they do not match the results of fine-tuned task-specific models, even at the largest scales (e.g. for GPT-4). Nevertheless, we do see consistent performance improvements across model scale. Additionally, we investigate prompting approaches to improve performance, and discuss the practicalities of using LLMs for these tasks.
Read more5/16/2024
0
A Hard Nut to Crack: Idiom Detection with Conversational Large Language Models
Francesca De Luca Fornaciari, Bego~na Altuna, Itziar Gonzalez-Dios, Maite Melero
In this work, we explore idiomatic language processing with Large Language Models (LLMs). We introduce the Idiomatic language Test Suite IdioTS, a new dataset of difficult examples specifically designed by language experts to assess the capabilities of LLMs to process figurative language at sentence level. We propose a comprehensive evaluation methodology based on an idiom detection task, where LLMs are prompted with detecting an idiomatic expression in a given English sentence. We present a thorough automatic and manual evaluation of the results and an extensive error analysis.
Read more5/20/2024
💬
0
From Text to Insight: Leveraging Large Language Models for Performance Evaluation in Management
Ning Li, Huaikang Zhou, Mingze Xu
This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, to enhance objectivity in organizational task performance evaluations. Through comparative analyses across two studies, including various task performance outputs, we demonstrate that LLMs can serve as a reliable and even superior alternative to human raters in evaluating knowledge-based performance outputs, which are a key contribution of knowledge workers. Our results suggest that GPT ratings are comparable to human ratings but exhibit higher consistency and reliability. Additionally, combined multiple GPT ratings on the same performance output show strong correlations with aggregated human performance ratings, akin to the consensus principle observed in performance evaluation literature. However, we also find that LLMs are prone to contextual biases, such as the halo effect, mirroring human evaluative biases. Our research suggests that while LLMs are capable of extracting meaningful constructs from text-based data, their scope is currently limited to specific forms of performance evaluation. By highlighting both the potential and limitations of LLMs, our study contributes to the discourse on AI role in management studies and sets a foundation for future research to refine AI theoretical and practical applications in management.
Read more8/13/2024
✅
0
Improving LLM Abilities in Idiomatic Translation
Sundesh Donthi, Maximilian Spencer, Om Patel, Joon Doh, Eid Rodan
For large language models (LLMs) like NLLB and GPT, translating idioms remains a challenge. Our goal is to enhance translation fidelity by improving LLM processing of idiomatic language while preserving the original linguistic style. This has a significant social impact, as it preserves cultural nuances and ensures translated texts retain their intent and emotional resonance, fostering better cross-cultural communication. Previous work has utilized knowledge bases like IdiomKB by providing the LLM with the meaning of an idiom to use in translation. Although this method yielded better results than a direct translation, it is still limited in its ability to preserve idiomatic writing style across languages. In this research, we expand upon the knowledge base to find corresponding idioms in the target language. Our research performs translations using two methods: The first method employs the SentenceTransformers model to semantically generate cosine similarity scores between the meanings of the original and target language idioms, selecting the best idiom (Cosine Similarity method). The second method uses an LLM to find a corresponding idiom in the target language for use in the translation (LLM-generated idiom method). As a baseline, we performed a direct translation without providing additional information. Human evaluations on the English -> Chinese, and Chinese -> English show the Cosine Similarity Lookup method out-performed others in all GPT4o translations. To further build upon IdiomKB, we developed a low-resource Urdu dataset containing Urdu idioms and their translations. Despite dataset limitations, the Cosine Similarity Lookup method shows promise, potentially overcoming language barriers and enabling the exploration of diverse literary works in Chinese and Urdu.
Read more7/17/2024