A Hard Nut to Crack: Idiom Detection with Conversational Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2405.10579 - Published 5/20/2024 by Francesca De Luca Fornaciari, Bego~na Altuna, Itziar Gonzalez-Dios, Maite Melero
Total Score

0

A Hard Nut to Crack: Idiom Detection with Conversational Large Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the challenge of detecting idiomatic expressions in conversational language models.
  • Idioms are commonly used in everyday speech but can be difficult for AI systems to recognize and understand.
  • The researchers investigate how well large language models (LLMs) can identify idiomatic expressions in dialogue.
  • They compare the performance of different LLM architectures and fine-tuning approaches on idiom detection tasks.

Plain English Explanation

Idioms are common expressions in a language that don't literally mean what the individual words suggest. For example, "it's a piece of cake" doesn't actually refer to a dessert, but rather means something is easy to do. These types of idiomatic phrases can be tricky for conversational AI systems to recognize and interpret correctly.

The researchers in this paper looked at how well large language models - powerful AI systems trained on massive amounts of text data - are able to detect idioms in conversational contexts. They tested different model architectures and training approaches to see which ones worked best at identifying idiomatic expressions.

The goal was to understand the challenges these AI systems face in processing natural language, especially the nuanced and figurative ways that people often communicate in everyday conversation. Improving idiom detection could lead to more natural and human-like dialogue for conversational AI assistants.

Technical Explanation

The paper evaluates the performance of several large language model (LLM) architectures, including GPT-3, BART, and T5, on the task of idiom detection in conversational contexts.

The researchers curated a dataset of conversational dialogues containing both literal and idiomatic expressions. They fine-tuned the LLMs on this dataset and evaluated their ability to correctly classify whether a given phrase was being used idiomatically or literally.

The results showed that while the LLMs performed reasonably well on the task, there is still significant room for improvement. Certain model architectures and fine-tuning approaches demonstrated better idiom detection capabilities than others. The researchers also found that the performance of the models was influenced by factors like the complexity and familiarity of the idiomatic expressions.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful analysis of the challenges that large language models face in processing idiomatic expressions in conversational contexts. The researchers acknowledge the limitations of their study, noting that the dataset they used may not capture the full breadth of idiomatic usage in real-world dialogue.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying reasons why certain models or training approaches performed better than others on the idiom detection task. Further research is needed to better understand the specific linguistic and semantic capabilities required to accurately identify idiomatic usages.

Future work could explore more advanced techniques, such as incorporating commonsense reasoning or leveraging multimodal information, to enhance the ability of conversational AI systems to handle idiomatic language. Evaluating the performance of these models on a wider range of linguistic tasks would also provide valuable insights into their overall linguistic capabilities.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the ongoing challenge of enabling conversational AI systems to understand the nuanced and figurative ways that humans communicate. While large language models have made significant progress in natural language processing, accurately detecting idiomatic expressions remains a hard nut to crack.

The researchers' findings suggest that continued advancements in AI architecture and training techniques, combined with a deeper understanding of the linguistic and cognitive aspects of idiom comprehension, will be necessary to develop truly human-like conversational abilities in artificial intelligence.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

A Hard Nut to Crack: Idiom Detection with Conversational Large Language Models
Total Score

0

A Hard Nut to Crack: Idiom Detection with Conversational Large Language Models

Francesca De Luca Fornaciari, Bego~na Altuna, Itziar Gonzalez-Dios, Maite Melero

In this work, we explore idiomatic language processing with Large Language Models (LLMs). We introduce the Idiomatic language Test Suite IdioTS, a new dataset of difficult examples specifically designed by language experts to assess the capabilities of LLMs to process figurative language at sentence level. We propose a comprehensive evaluation methodology based on an idiom detection task, where LLMs are prompted with detecting an idiomatic expression in a given English sentence. We present a thorough automatic and manual evaluation of the results and an extensive error analysis.

Read more

5/20/2024

Sign of the Times: Evaluating the use of Large Language Models for Idiomaticity Detection
Total Score

0

Sign of the Times: Evaluating the use of Large Language Models for Idiomaticity Detection

Dylan Phelps, Thomas Pickard, Maggie Mi, Edward Gow-Smith, Aline Villavicencio

Despite the recent ubiquity of large language models and their high zero-shot prompted performance across a wide range of tasks, it is still not known how well they perform on tasks which require processing of potentially idiomatic language. In particular, how well do such models perform in comparison to encoder-only models fine-tuned specifically for idiomaticity tasks? In this work, we attempt to answer this question by looking at the performance of a range of LLMs (both local and software-as-a-service models) on three idiomaticity datasets: SemEval 2022 Task 2a, FLUTE, and MAGPIE. Overall, we find that whilst these models do give competitive performance, they do not match the results of fine-tuned task-specific models, even at the largest scales (e.g. for GPT-4). Nevertheless, we do see consistent performance improvements across model scale. Additionally, we investigate prompting approaches to improve performance, and discuss the practicalities of using LLMs for these tasks.

Read more

5/16/2024

Total Score

0

Improving LLM Abilities in Idiomatic Translation

Sundesh Donthi, Maximilian Spencer, Om Patel, Joon Doh, Eid Rodan

For large language models (LLMs) like NLLB and GPT, translating idioms remains a challenge. Our goal is to enhance translation fidelity by improving LLM processing of idiomatic language while preserving the original linguistic style. This has a significant social impact, as it preserves cultural nuances and ensures translated texts retain their intent and emotional resonance, fostering better cross-cultural communication. Previous work has utilized knowledge bases like IdiomKB by providing the LLM with the meaning of an idiom to use in translation. Although this method yielded better results than a direct translation, it is still limited in its ability to preserve idiomatic writing style across languages. In this research, we expand upon the knowledge base to find corresponding idioms in the target language. Our research performs translations using two methods: The first method employs the SentenceTransformers model to semantically generate cosine similarity scores between the meanings of the original and target language idioms, selecting the best idiom (Cosine Similarity method). The second method uses an LLM to find a corresponding idiom in the target language for use in the translation (LLM-generated idiom method). As a baseline, we performed a direct translation without providing additional information. Human evaluations on the English -> Chinese, and Chinese -> English show the Cosine Similarity Lookup method out-performed others in all GPT4o translations. To further build upon IdiomKB, we developed a low-resource Urdu dataset containing Urdu idioms and their translations. Despite dataset limitations, the Cosine Similarity Lookup method shows promise, potentially overcoming language barriers and enabling the exploration of diverse literary works in Chinese and Urdu.

Read more

7/17/2024

LLM Honeypot: Leveraging Large Language Models as Advanced Interactive Honeypot Systems
Total Score

0

LLM Honeypot: Leveraging Large Language Models as Advanced Interactive Honeypot Systems

Hakan T. Otal, M. Abdullah Canbaz

The rapid evolution of cyber threats necessitates innovative solutions for detecting and analyzing malicious activity. Honeypots, which are decoy systems designed to lure and interact with attackers, have emerged as a critical component in cybersecurity. In this paper, we present a novel approach to creating realistic and interactive honeypot systems using Large Language Models (LLMs). By fine-tuning a pre-trained open-source language model on a diverse dataset of attacker-generated commands and responses, we developed a honeypot capable of sophisticated engagement with attackers. Our methodology involved several key steps: data collection and processing, prompt engineering, model selection, and supervised fine-tuning to optimize the model's performance. Evaluation through similarity metrics and live deployment demonstrated that our approach effectively generates accurate and informative responses. The results highlight the potential of LLMs to revolutionize honeypot technology, providing cybersecurity professionals with a powerful tool to detect and analyze malicious activity, thereby enhancing overall security infrastructure.

Read more

9/14/2024