Simplifying Scholarly Abstracts for Accessible Digital Libraries
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Simplifies scholarly abstracts to make digital libraries more accessible
- Focuses on improving the readability of scientific papers for a general audience
- Explores techniques for automatically rewriting complex abstracts into easier-to-understand versions
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores ways to make scholarly abstracts, the short summaries at the beginning of academic papers, more accessible to readers who may not have specialized knowledge in a field. Scholarly abstracts are often written in dense, technical language that can be difficult for non-experts to understand.
The researchers propose methods to automatically rewrite these abstracts into simpler, more readable versions. This could help make scientific research more broadly accessible to the general public, students, and others without deep expertise in a particular subject area.
By generating easier-to-understand summaries, the goal is to lower the barrier for people to engage with and learn from scholarly work, ultimately promoting the dissemination of scientific knowledge.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews prior research on abstractive text summarization and techniques for simplifying text. It then proposes a new approach that combines extractive and abstractive summarization methods to produce simplified scholarly abstracts.
The key steps are:
- Extractive Summarization: Identify the most salient sentences in the original abstract.
- Abstractive Simplification: Rephrase and shorten the extracted sentences to make them easier to understand.
- Evaluation: Assess the readability and faithfulness of the simplified abstracts using both automated metrics and human evaluation.
Experiments on a dataset of computer science papers show that this two-stage approach can generate simplified abstracts that are more readable while still preserving the core content of the originals.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for improving the accessibility of scholarly work, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:
- The techniques have only been evaluated on computer science papers, so it's unclear how well they would generalize to other domains with different writing styles and conventions.
- The automated evaluation metrics may not fully capture nuanced aspects of readability and content preservation that would require more in-depth human assessment.
- The proposed methods still rely on access to the full-text of papers, which may not always be available, especially for older or less widely disseminated works.
Additional research could explore ways to further adapt the summarization and simplification models to handle a wider range of scholarly content, as well as investigate techniques that require only the abstract itself as input.
Conclusion
This paper introduces an innovative approach to making scholarly abstracts more accessible to a general audience. By combining extractive and abstractive summarization, the proposed methods can generate simplified versions of complex technical summaries while preserving their essential content.
If successfully implemented, this type of text simplification technology could significantly lower the barriers to engaging with and understanding scientific research, ultimately aiding the dissemination of knowledge and promoting broader public engagement with scholarly work.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Simplifying Scholarly Abstracts for Accessible Digital Libraries
Haining Wang, Jason Clark
Standing at the forefront of knowledge dissemination, digital libraries curate vast collections of scientific literature. However, these scholarly writings are often laden with jargon and tailored for domain experts rather than the general public. As librarians, we strive to offer services to a diverse audience, including those with lower reading levels. To extend our services beyond mere access, we propose fine-tuning a language model to rewrite scholarly abstracts into more comprehensible versions, thereby making scholarly literature more accessible when requested. We began by introducing a corpus specifically designed for training models to simplify scholarly abstracts. This corpus consists of over three thousand pairs of abstracts and significance statements from diverse disciplines. We then fine-tuned four language models using this corpus. The outputs from the models were subsequently examined both quantitatively for accessibility and semantic coherence, and qualitatively for language quality, faithfulness, and completeness. Our findings show that the resulting models can improve readability by over three grade levels, while maintaining fidelity to the original content. Although commercial state-of-the-art models still hold an edge, our models are much more compact, can be deployed locally in an affordable manner, and alleviate the privacy concerns associated with using commercial models. We envision this work as a step toward more inclusive and accessible libraries, improving our services for young readers and those without a college degree.
Read more8/9/2024
0
Artificial Intuition: Efficient Classification of Scientific Abstracts
Harsh Sakhrani, Naseela Pervez, Anirudh Ravi Kumar, Fred Morstatter, Alexandra Graddy Reed, Andrea Belz
It is desirable to coarsely classify short scientific texts, such as grant or publication abstracts, for strategic insight or research portfolio management. These texts efficiently transmit dense information to experts possessing a rich body of knowledge to aid interpretation. Yet this task is remarkably difficult to automate because of brevity and the absence of context. To address this gap, we have developed a novel approach to generate and appropriately assign coarse domain-specific labels. We show that a Large Language Model (LLM) can provide metadata essential to the task, in a process akin to the augmentation of supplemental knowledge representing human intuition, and propose a workflow. As a pilot study, we use a corpus of award abstracts from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). We develop new assessment tools in concert with established performance metrics.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Exploring Large Language Models to generate Easy to Read content
Paloma Mart'inez, Lourdes Moreno, Alberto Ramos
Ensuring text accessibility and understandability are essential goals, particularly for individuals with cognitive impairments and intellectual disabilities, who encounter challenges in accessing information across various mediums such as web pages, newspapers, administrative tasks, or health documents. Initiatives like Easy to Read and Plain Language guidelines aim to simplify complex texts; however, standardizing these guidelines remains challenging and often involves manual processes. This work presents an exploratory investigation into leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) approaches to systematically simplify Spanish texts into Easy to Read formats, with a focus on utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) for simplifying texts, especially in generating Easy to Read content. The study contributes a parallel corpus of Spanish adapted for Easy To Read format, which serves as a valuable resource for training and testing text simplification systems. Additionally, several text simplification experiments using LLMs and the collected corpus are conducted, involving fine-tuning and testing a Llama2 model to generate Easy to Read content. A qualitative evaluation, guided by an expert in text adaptation for Easy to Read content, is carried out to assess the automatically simplified texts. This research contributes to advancing text accessibility for individuals with cognitive impairments, highlighting promising strategies for leveraging LLMs while responsibly managing energy usage.
Read more7/30/2024
🤔
0
Synthesizing Scientific Summaries: An Extractive and Abstractive Approach
Grishma Sharma, Aditi Paretkar, Deepak Sharma
The availability of a vast array of research papers in any area of study, necessitates the need of automated summarisation systems that can present the key research conducted and their corresponding findings. Scientific paper summarisation is a challenging task for various reasons including token length limits in modern transformer models and corresponding memory and compute requirements for long text. A significant amount of work has been conducted in this area, with approaches that modify the attention mechanisms of existing transformer models and others that utilise discourse information to capture long range dependencies in research papers. In this paper, we propose a hybrid methodology for research paper summarisation which incorporates an extractive and abstractive approach. We use the extractive approach to capture the key findings of research, and pair it with the introduction of the paper which captures the motivation for research. We use two models based on unsupervised learning for the extraction stage and two transformer language models, resulting in four combinations for our hybrid approach. The performances of the models are evaluated on three metrics and we present our findings in this paper. We find that using certain combinations of hyper parameters, it is possible for automated summarisation systems to exceed the abstractiveness of summaries written by humans. Finally, we state our future scope of research in extending this methodology to summarisation of generalised long documents.
Read more7/30/2024