In Situ AI Prototyping: Infusing Multimodal Prompts into Mobile Settings with MobileMaker
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents MobileMaker, a novel system that enables in-situ AI prototyping on mobile devices.
- MobileMaker allows users to infuse multimodal prompts, including text, images, and voice, into mobile settings to rapidly generate and explore AI-powered content.
- The paper discusses the design and implementation of MobileMaker, as well as insights from a user study evaluating its effectiveness for mobile AI prototyping.
Plain English Explanation
MobileMaker is a tool that lets you create and test AI-powered prototypes right on your mobile device. With MobileMaker, you can combine different types of inputs like text, images, and voice to generate content using AI. This allows you to quickly explore and refine your ideas without being stuck at a desktop computer.
The researchers behind MobileMaker designed the system to make it easy for people to try out their AI-powered concepts in real-world, mobile settings. They then studied how people used MobileMaker and what they thought of it, to understand the benefits and challenges of this approach to AI prototyping.
Rapid Mobile App Development with Generative AI Agents and Unlocking Adaptive User Experiences with Generative AI are related papers that explore how AI can streamline the mobile app development process and create more personalized user experiences.
Technical Explanation
MobileMaker is designed to enable in-situ AI prototyping on mobile devices. It allows users to combine multimodal inputs, such as text, images, and voice, into prompts that can be used to generate AI-powered content in real-time.
The system architecture includes a mobile app that handles the user interface and input capture, as well as a cloud-based AI model that processes the prompts and generates the output. MobileMaker leverages large language models and other generative AI techniques to create a variety of content, from text to images and beyond.
The researchers conducted a user study to evaluate MobileMaker's effectiveness for mobile AI prototyping. Participants were able to use the system to quickly explore ideas and iterate on AI-powered concepts within a mobile context. The study provided insights into the benefits of this approach, as well as some of the technical and usability challenges that need to be addressed.
Predicting Usability of Mobile Applications using AI Tools and Large Language Models for Voice-Interactive User Interfaces are related papers that explore the use of AI for mobile app development and voice-based interactions.
Critical Analysis
The researchers provide a compelling demonstration of how MobileMaker can enable more accessible and iterative AI prototyping in mobile settings. However, the paper does not delve deeply into the technical details of the underlying AI models and algorithms used, which would be helpful for understanding the system's capabilities and limitations.
Additionally, the user study, while informative, had a relatively small sample size and focused primarily on usability. Further research is needed to understand the long-term impact of this approach on the AI prototyping process, as well as how it compares to other mobile-centric AI development tools.
OmniActions: Predicting Digital Actions in Response to Real-World Events is a related paper that explores the challenges of AI-powered prediction in real-world settings, which could provide useful insights for improving the capabilities and reliability of MobileMaker.
Conclusion
MobileMaker represents an important step forward in making AI prototyping more accessible and adaptable to mobile environments. By allowing users to infuse multimodal prompts into their day-to-day activities, the system has the potential to democratize the process of experimenting with generative AI technologies.
As AI continues to permeate various aspects of our lives, tools like MobileMaker will become increasingly valuable for empowering users to explore and shape the ways in which these technologies are integrated into our mobile experiences. Further research and development in this area could lead to significant advancements in the field of human-AI interaction and collaboration.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
In Situ AI Prototyping: Infusing Multimodal Prompts into Mobile Settings with MobileMaker
Savvas Petridis, Michael Xieyang Liu, Alexander J. Fiannaca, Vivian Tsai, Michael Terry, Carrie J. Cai
Recent advances in multimodal large language models (LLMs) have made it easier to rapidly prototype AI-powered features, especially for mobile use cases. However, gathering early, mobile-situated user feedback on these AI prototypes remains challenging. The broad scope and flexibility of LLMs means that, for a given use-case-specific prototype, there is a crucial need to understand the wide range of in-the-wild input users are likely to provide and their in-context expectations for the AI's behavior. To explore the concept of in situ AI prototyping and testing, we created MobileMaker: a platform that enables designers to rapidly create and test mobile AI prototypes directly on devices. This tool also enables testers to make on-device, in-the-field revisions of prototypes using natural language. In an exploratory study with 16 participants, we explored how user feedback on prototypes created with MobileMaker compares to that of existing prototyping tools (e.g., Figma, prompt editors). Our findings suggest that MobileMaker prototypes enabled more serendipitous discovery of: model input edge cases, discrepancies between AI's and user's in-context interpretation of the task, and contextual signals missed by the AI. Furthermore, we learned that while the ability to make in-the-wild revisions led users to feel more fulfilled as active participants in the design process, it might also constrain their feedback to the subset of changes perceived as more actionable or implementable by the prototyping tool.
Read more10/3/2024
🤖
0
Predicting the usability of mobile applications using AI tools: the rise of large user interface models, opportunities, and challenges
Abdallah Namoun, Ahmed Alrehaili, Zaib Un Nisa, Hani Almoamari, Ali Tufail
This article proposes the so-called large user interface models (LUIMs) to enable the generation of user interfaces and prediction of usability using artificial intelligence in the context of mobile applications.
Read more5/8/2024
0
Context-Based Interface Prototyping: Understanding the Effect of Prototype Representation on User Feedback
Marius Hoggenmueller, Martin Tomitsch, Luke Hespanhol, Tram Thi Minh Tran, Stewart Worrall, Eduardo Nebot
The rise of autonomous systems in cities, such as automated vehicles (AVs), requires new approaches for prototyping and evaluating how people interact with those systems through context-based user interfaces, such as external human-machine interfaces (eHMIs). In this paper, we present a comparative study of three prototype representations (real-world VR, computer-generated VR, real-world video) of an eHMI in a mixed-methods study with 42 participants. Quantitative results show that while the real-world VR representation results in higher sense of presence, no significant differences in user experience and trust towards the AV itself were found. However, interview data shows that participants focused on different experiential and perceptual aspects in each of the prototype representations. These differences are linked to spatial awareness and perceived realism of the AV behaviour and its context, affecting in turn how participants assess trust and the eHMI. The paper offers guidelines for prototyping and evaluating context-based interfaces through simulations.
Read more6/14/2024
📈
0
Emerging Practices for Large Multimodal Model (LMM) Assistance for People with Visual Impairments: Implications for Design
Jingyi Xie, Rui Yu, He Zhang, Sooyeon Lee, Syed Masum Billah, John M. Carroll
People with visual impairments perceive their environment non-visually and often use AI-powered assistive tools to obtain textual descriptions of visual information. Recent large vision-language model-based AI-powered tools like Be My AI are more capable of understanding users' inquiries in natural language and describing the scene in audible text; however, the extent to which these tools are useful to visually impaired users is currently understudied. This paper aims to fill this gap. Our study with 14 visually impaired users reveals that they are adapting these tools organically -- not only can these tools facilitate complex interactions in household, spatial, and social contexts, but they also act as an extension of users' cognition, as if the cognition were distributed in the visual information. We also found that although the tools are currently not goal-oriented, users accommodate this limitation and embrace the tools' capabilities for broader use. These findings enable us to envision design implications for creating more goal-oriented, real-time processing, and reliable AI-powered assistive technology.
Read more7/15/2024