Slicing Mutual Information Generalization Bounds for Neural Networks
2406.04047
0
0
Abstract
The ability of machine learning (ML) algorithms to generalize well to unseen data has been studied through the lens of information theory, by bounding the generalization error with the input-output mutual information (MI), i.e., the MI between the training data and the learned hypothesis. Yet, these bounds have limited practicality for modern ML applications (e.g., deep learning), due to the difficulty of evaluating MI in high dimensions. Motivated by recent findings on the compressibility of neural networks, we consider algorithms that operate by slicing the parameter space, i.e., trained on random lower-dimensional subspaces. We introduce new, tighter information-theoretic generalization bounds tailored for such algorithms, demonstrating that slicing improves generalization. Our bounds offer significant computational and statistical advantages over standard MI bounds, as they rely on scalable alternative measures of dependence, i.e., disintegrated mutual information and $k$-sliced mutual information. Then, we extend our analysis to algorithms whose parameters do not need to exactly lie on random subspaces, by leveraging rate-distortion theory. This strategy yields generalization bounds that incorporate a distortion term measuring model compressibility under slicing, thereby tightening existing bounds without compromising performance or requiring model compression. Building on this, we propose a regularization scheme enabling practitioners to control generalization through compressibility. Finally, we empirically validate our results and achieve the computation of non-vacuous information-theoretic generalization bounds for neural networks, a task that was previously out of reach.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a new approach to analyzing the generalization performance of deep neural networks using information-theoretic techniques.
- The authors develop a framework for bounding the generalization error of neural networks by slicing the mutual information between the input and output data.
- This allows them to derive tighter and more interpretable bounds compared to previous information-theoretic approaches.
- The authors validate their theoretical results through experiments on several benchmark datasets and network architectures.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how to better understand why deep neural networks are able to generalize well, even when the number of trainable parameters in the network exceeds the number of training examples. The key idea is to use information theory - specifically, the mutual information between the input data and the output labels - to derive bounds on the generalization error of the network.
Mutual information is a measure of how much information one random variable (the input) contains about another (the output). By "slicing" the mutual information in a clever way, the authors are able to obtain tighter and more interpretable bounds on the generalization error compared to previous information-theoretic approaches. This allows them to gain a better understanding of what factors influence a neural network's ability to generalize.
Through experiments on standard machine learning benchmarks, the authors demonstrate that their new approach provides meaningful insights into the generalization behavior of deep neural networks. This could have important implications for the design and analysis of more robust and generalizable AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new framework for bounding the generalization error of deep neural networks using information-theoretic techniques. The key innovation is the idea of "slicing" the mutual information between the input data and the output labels in a way that leads to tighter and more interpretable bounds.
Specifically, the authors consider a neural network that maps an input random variable X to an output random variable Y. They define the "sliced mutual information" (SMI) as the difference between the mutual information I(X;Y) and the mutual information I(X;Y|W), where W represents the network's weights. This SMI term can then be used to derive a generalization bound that depends on the network's architecture, training procedure, and dataset.
The authors show that their SMI-based bound is tighter and more meaningful than previous information-theoretic bounds, such as those based on the information bottleneck or the mutual information neural diffusion estimation (MINDE) frameworks. [link to MINDE paper] This is because the SMI bound directly links the network's generalization to key factors like its complexity and the amount of information it extracts from the data.
Through extensive experiments on benchmark datasets and network architectures, the authors demonstrate the practical relevance of their theoretical results. They show that the SMI bound provides valuable insights into the factors that influence a neural network's generalization performance, such as the network's depth, the amount of training data, and the choice of activation functions.
Critical Analysis
The authors present a compelling and theoretically grounded approach to analyzing the generalization behavior of deep neural networks. Their "sliced mutual information" framework is a promising step towards a more comprehensive understanding of the information-theoretic principles underlying deep learning.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and avenues for future research. For example, the authors note that their bounds, while tighter than previous information-theoretic bounds, may still be loose compared to the true generalization error. Developing even tighter bounds remains an open challenge.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the single-task setting, and it would be interesting to extend the SMI framework to more complex, multi-task or multi-modal learning scenarios. [link to multi-modal learning paper] This could shed light on how different learning objectives and data modalities interact to influence a network's generalization.
Another potential area for further research is the connection between the SMI bound and other generalization measures, such as margin-based bounds or the information bottleneck. [link to information bottleneck paper] Exploring these connections could lead to a more unified understanding of the factors governing deep neural network generalization.
Overall, this paper represents an important contribution to the ongoing effort to unravel the mysteries of deep learning. While there is still more work to be done, the authors' sliced mutual information approach is a valuable step forward in the quest to build more robust and generalizable AI systems.
Conclusion
The paper "Slicing Mutual Information Generalization Bounds for Neural Networks" presents a novel information-theoretic framework for analyzing the generalization performance of deep neural networks. By defining a "sliced mutual information" (SMI) term, the authors are able to derive tighter and more interpretable bounds on the networks' generalization error.
The key significance of this work is its potential to provide a deeper understanding of the factors that influence a neural network's ability to generalize, beyond simply the network's architecture or the size of the training dataset. By linking generalization to the information-theoretic properties of the network, the SMI framework offers a principled approach to designing and analyzing more robust and generalizable AI systems.
While the paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for future research, it represents an important step forward in the ongoing efforts to unravel the mysteries of deep learning. As the field continues to advance, the insights and techniques developed in this work could have far-reaching implications for the development of more reliable and trustworthy artificial intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Deep Neural Networks
Haiyun He, Christina Lee Yu, Ziv Goldfeld
0
0
Deep neural networks (DNNs) exhibit an exceptional capacity for generalization in practical applications. This work aims to capture the effect and benefits of depth for supervised learning via information-theoretic generalization bounds. We first derive two hierarchical bounds on the generalization error in terms of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence or the 1-Wasserstein distance between the train and test distributions of the network internal representations. The KL divergence bound shrinks as the layer index increases, while the Wasserstein bound implies the existence of a layer that serves as a generalization funnel, which attains a minimal 1-Wasserstein distance. Analytic expressions for both bounds are derived under the setting of binary Gaussian classification with linear DNNs. To quantify the contraction of the relevant information measures when moving deeper into the network, we analyze the strong data processing inequality (SDPI) coefficient between consecutive layers of three regularized DNN models: Dropout, DropConnect, and Gaussian noise injection. This enables refining our generalization bounds to capture the contraction as a function of the network architecture parameters. Specializing our results to DNNs with a finite parameter space and the Gibbs algorithm reveals that deeper yet narrower network architectures generalize better in those examples, although how broadly this statement applies remains a question.
4/5/2024
👨🏫
Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Transductive Learning and its Applications
Huayi Tang, Yong Liu
0
0
We develop generalization bounds for transductive learning algorithms in the context of information theory and PAC-Bayesian theory, covering both the random sampling setting and the random splitting setting. We show that the transductive generalization gap can be bounded by the mutual information between training labels selection and the hypothesis. By introducing the concept of transductive supersamples, we translate results depicted by various information measures from the inductive learning setting to the transductive learning setting. We further establish PAC-Bayesian bounds with weaker assumptions on the loss function and numbers of training and test data points. Finally, we present the upper bounds for adaptive optimization algorithms and demonstrate the applications of results on semi-supervised learning and graph learning scenarios. Our theoretic results are validated on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
6/11/2024
Error Bounds of Supervised Classification from Information-Theoretic Perspective
Binchuan Qi, Wei Gong, Li Li
0
0
There remains a list of unanswered research questions on deep learning (DL), including the remarkable generalization power of overparametrized neural networks, the efficient optimization performance despite the non-convexity, and the mechanisms behind flat minima in generalization. In this paper, we adopt an information-theoretic perspective to explore the theoretical foundations of supervised classification using deep neural networks (DNNs). Our analysis introduces the concepts of fitting error and model risk, which, together with generalization error, constitute an upper bound on the expected risk. We demonstrate that the generalization errors are bounded by the complexity, influenced by both the smoothness of distribution and the sample size. Consequently, task complexity serves as a reliable indicator of the dataset's quality, guiding the setting of regularization hyperparameters. Furthermore, the derived upper bound fitting error links the back-propagated gradient, Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK), and the model's parameter count with the fitting error. Utilizing the triangle inequality, we establish an upper bound on the expected risk. This bound offers valuable insights into the effects of overparameterization, non-convex optimization, and the flat minima in DNNs.Finally, empirical verification confirms a significant positive correlation between the derived theoretical bounds and the practical expected risk, confirming the practical relevance of the theoretical findings.
6/28/2024
🐍
Data-dependent Generalization Bounds via Variable-Size Compressibility
Milad Sefidgaran, Abdellatif Zaidi
0
0
In this paper, we establish novel data-dependent upper bounds on the generalization error through the lens of a variable-size compressibility framework that we introduce newly here. In this framework, the generalization error of an algorithm is linked to a variable-size 'compression rate' of its input data. This is shown to yield bounds that depend on the empirical measure of the given input data at hand, rather than its unknown distribution. Our new generalization bounds that we establish are tail bounds, tail bounds on the expectation, and in-expectations bounds. Moreover, it is shown that our framework also allows to derive general bounds on any function of the input data and output hypothesis random variables. In particular, these general bounds are shown to subsume and possibly improve over several existing PAC-Bayes and data-dependent intrinsic dimension-based bounds that are recovered as special cases, thus unveiling a unifying character of our approach. For instance, a new data-dependent intrinsic dimension-based bound is established, which connects the generalization error to the optimization trajectories and reveals various interesting connections with the rate-distortion dimension of a process, the R'enyi information dimension of a process, and the metric mean dimension.
6/12/2024