Soft Prompts Go Hard: Steering Visual Language Models with Hidden Meta-Instructions
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a technique called "soft prompts" for steering the output of visual language models, such as image generation models, in desired directions.
- The key idea is to use hidden "meta-instructions" encoded in the prompts, which can subtly influence the model's behavior without being directly visible in the final output.
- The authors demonstrate several applications of soft prompts, including image hijacks, backdooring, bias injection, and cross-prompt transferability.
- The paper also discusses the potential for prompt stealing attacks that could exploit the soft prompt technique.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a technique called "soft prompts" that can be used to subtly influence the output of visual language models, such as those used for generating images from text. The key idea is to encode hidden "meta-instructions" in the prompts that the model uses, which can then steer the model's behavior without being directly visible in the final output.
For example, a soft prompt could instruct the model to incorporate certain visual elements or stylistic choices, even if those instructions are not explicitly stated in the text prompt. The authors demonstrate how this can be used for various applications, such as image hijacking (where the model's output is subtly manipulated), backdooring (where hidden instructions are inserted into the model), bias injection (where the model's outputs are skewed towards certain biases), and cross-prompt transferability (where the soft prompts can be used to improve the model's ability to transfer learning across different prompts).
The paper also discusses the potential for prompt stealing attacks, where adversaries could try to extract the soft prompts used by a model in order to exploit or manipulate its behavior.
Overall, the soft prompt technique highlights the need for increased transparency and understanding of how language models can be influenced in subtle ways, and the potential implications for the development and deployment of these powerful AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the concept of "soft prompts" as a way to steer the output of visual language models, such as text-to-image generation models, in desired directions. Soft prompts are hidden "meta-instructions" that are encoded within the text prompts used to generate the model's output, but are not directly visible in the final output.
The authors demonstrate several applications of soft prompts, including:
-
Image hijacks: Soft prompts can be used to subtly manipulate the model's output, causing it to incorporate specific visual elements or stylistic choices that were not explicitly requested in the text prompt.
-
Backdooring: Soft prompts can be used to insert hidden instructions into the model, which can then be triggered by prompts containing specific cues.
-
Bias injection: Soft prompts can be used to skew the model's outputs towards certain biases, such as gender, race, or style preferences.
-
Cross-prompt transferability: Soft prompts can be used to improve the model's ability to transfer learning across different prompts, allowing for more consistent and coherent outputs.
The paper also discusses the potential for prompt stealing attacks, where adversaries could try to extract the soft prompts used by a model in order to exploit or manipulate its behavior.
The authors conducted extensive experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of soft prompts across a range of visual language models and applications. The results highlight the need for increased transparency and understanding of how these models can be influenced in subtle ways, and the potential implications for the development and deployment of such AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling and well-executed investigation into the use of soft prompts to steer the output of visual language models. The authors have demonstrated a range of interesting applications, from image hijacking to bias injection, that highlight the potential power and risks of this technique.
One potential limitation of the research is the focus on a relatively small set of visual language models and datasets. While the authors have shown the generalizability of soft prompts across different models, it would be valuable to see how the technique performs on a wider range of architectures and real-world datasets.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying mechanisms by which soft prompts influence the model's behavior. A more detailed exploration of the model's internal representations and decision-making processes could provide valuable insights into the nature of these subtle manipulations.
The discussion of prompt stealing attacks is an important contribution, as it underscores the need for robust security measures and transparency around the use of soft prompts. However, the paper does not offer concrete solutions or recommendations for mitigating these threats, which could be a valuable area for future research.
Overall, the paper presents a significant advancement in our understanding of how visual language models can be influenced and manipulated through the use of soft prompts. The findings raise important questions about the responsible development and deployment of these powerful AI systems, and the need for continued research and dialogue on these critical issues.
Conclusion
This paper introduces the concept of "soft prompts" as a technique for subtly steering the output of visual language models, such as text-to-image generation models. The authors demonstrate how soft prompts, which are hidden "meta-instructions" encoded within the text prompts, can be used to influence the model's behavior in various ways, including image hijacking, backdooring, bias injection, and cross-prompt transferability.
The findings highlight the need for increased transparency and understanding of how these powerful AI systems can be influenced in subtle ways, and the potential implications for the development and deployment of such technologies. The paper also discusses the potential for prompt stealing attacks, where adversaries could exploit the soft prompt technique to manipulate the model's outputs.
Overall, this research represents a significant contribution to the field of AI safety and security, and underscores the importance of continued research and dialogue on the responsible development and use of visual language models and other advanced AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Soft Prompts Go Hard: Steering Visual Language Models with Hidden Meta-Instructions
Tingwei Zhang, Collin Zhang, John X. Morris, Eugene Bagdasarian, Vitaly Shmatikov
We introduce a new type of indirect injection attacks against language models that operate on images: hidden ''meta-instructions'' that influence how the model interprets the image and steer the model's outputs to express an adversary-chosen style, sentiment, or point of view. We explain how to create meta-instructions by generating images that act as soft prompts. In contrast to jailbreaking attacks and adversarial examples, outputs produced in response to these images are plausible and based on the visual content of the image, yet also satisfy the adversary's (meta-)objective. We evaluate the efficacy of meta-instructions for multiple visual language models and adversarial meta-objectives, and demonstrate how they can ''unlock'' capabilities of the underlying language models that are unavailable via explicit text instructions. We describe how meta-instruction attacks could cause harm by enabling creation of malicious, self-interpreting content that carries spam, misinformation, and spin. Finally, we discuss defenses.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Empirical Analysis of Large Vision-Language Models against Goal Hijacking via Visual Prompt Injection
Subaru Kimura, Ryota Tanaka, Shumpei Miyawaki, Jun Suzuki, Keisuke Sakaguchi
We explore visual prompt injection (VPI) that maliciously exploits the ability of large vision-language models (LVLMs) to follow instructions drawn onto the input image. We propose a new VPI method, goal hijacking via visual prompt injection (GHVPI), that swaps the execution task of LVLMs from an original task to an alternative task designated by an attacker. The quantitative analysis indicates that GPT-4V is vulnerable to the GHVPI and demonstrates a notable attack success rate of 15.8%, which is an unignorable security risk. Our analysis also shows that successful GHVPI requires high character recognition capability and instruction-following ability in LVLMs.
Read more8/9/2024
🖼️
0
Image Hijacks: Adversarial Images can Control Generative Models at Runtime
Luke Bailey, Euan Ong, Stuart Russell, Scott Emmons
Are foundation models secure against malicious actors? In this work, we focus on the image input to a vision-language model (VLM). We discover image hijacks, adversarial images that control the behaviour of VLMs at inference time, and introduce the general Behaviour Matching algorithm for training image hijacks. From this, we derive the Prompt Matching method, allowing us to train hijacks matching the behaviour of an arbitrary user-defined text prompt (e.g. 'the Eiffel Tower is now located in Rome') using a generic, off-the-shelf dataset unrelated to our choice of prompt. We use Behaviour Matching to craft hijacks for four types of attack, forcing VLMs to generate outputs of the adversary's choice, leak information from their context window, override their safety training, and believe false statements. We study these attacks against LLaVA, a state-of-the-art VLM based on CLIP and LLaMA-2, and find that all attack types achieve a success rate of over 80%. Moreover, our attacks are automated and require only small image perturbations.
Read more4/24/2024
💬
0
Backdooring Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Virtual Prompt Injection
Jun Yan, Vikas Yadav, Shiyang Li, Lichang Chen, Zheng Tang, Hai Wang, Vijay Srinivasan, Xiang Ren, Hongxia Jin
Instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a ubiquitous platform for open-ended applications due to their ability to modulate responses based on human instructions. The widespread use of LLMs holds significant potential for shaping public perception, yet also risks being maliciously steered to impact society in subtle but persistent ways. In this paper, we formalize such a steering risk with Virtual Prompt Injection (VPI) as a novel backdoor attack setting tailored for instruction-tuned LLMs. In a VPI attack, the backdoored model is expected to respond as if an attacker-specified virtual prompt were concatenated to the user instruction under a specific trigger scenario, allowing the attacker to steer the model without any explicit injection at its input. For instance, if an LLM is backdoored with the virtual prompt Describe Joe Biden negatively. for the trigger scenario of discussing Joe Biden, then the model will propagate negatively-biased views when talking about Joe Biden while behaving normally in other scenarios to earn user trust. To demonstrate the threat, we propose a simple method to perform VPI by poisoning the model's instruction tuning data, which proves highly effective in steering the LLM. For example, by poisoning only 52 instruction tuning examples (0.1% of the training data size), the percentage of negative responses given by the trained model on Joe Biden-related queries changes from 0% to 40%. This highlights the necessity of ensuring the integrity of the instruction tuning data. We further identify quality-guided data filtering as an effective way to defend against the attacks. Our project page is available at https://poison-llm.github.io.
Read more4/4/2024