Solving Robust MDPs through No-Regret Dynamics
2305.19035
0
0
📶
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning is a powerful framework for training agents to navigate different situations, but it is susceptible to changes in environmental dynamics. However, solving Markov Decision Processes that are robust to changes is difficult due to nonconvexity and size of action or state spaces. While most works have analyzed this problem by taking different assumptions on the problem, a general and efficient theoretical analysis is still missing. However, we generate a simple framework for improving robustness by solving a minimax iterative optimization problem where a policy player and an environmental dynamics player are playing against each other. Leveraging recent results in online nonconvex learning and techniques from improving policy gradient methods, we yield an algorithm that maximizes the robustness of the Value Function on the order of $mathcal{O}left(frac{1}{T^{frac{1}{2}}}right)$ where $T$ is the number of iterations of the algorithm.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Reinforcement learning is a powerful framework for training agents to navigate different situations
- However, it is susceptible to changes in environmental dynamics
- Solving Markov Decision Processes that are robust to changes is difficult due to nonconvexity and size of action or state spaces
- Most works have analyzed this problem by taking different assumptions, but a general and efficient theoretical analysis is still missing
Plain English Explanation
Reinforcement learning is a way for computer programs to learn how to make decisions in different situations. It's like teaching a robot how to navigate a maze by rewarding it when it makes good choices. But the problem is that these robots can struggle when the environment changes, like if the maze layout gets modified.
Researchers have tried to solve this issue of creating decision-making systems that are robust to environmental changes. However, this is a difficult challenge because the mathematical problems involved are complex and the possible actions or situations the robot could encounter can be very large.
While previous studies have looked at this problem in different ways, there hasn't been a general and efficient solution proposed yet. This new research paper introduces a simple framework that can improve the robustness of reinforcement learning algorithms by having the algorithm "compete" against potential changes in the environment.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a framework for improving the robustness of reinforcement learning agents by framing it as a minimax iterative optimization problem. In this setup, there is a "policy player" (the reinforcement learning agent) and an "environmental dynamics player" that are competing against each other.
The policy player is trying to find the best decision-making strategy, while the environmental dynamics player is trying to find the worst-case changes to the environment that could undermine that strategy. By solving this minimax problem, the resulting policy is optimized to perform well even in the face of adverse environmental changes.
The paper leverages recent advances in online nonconvex learning and techniques for improving policy gradient methods to yield an algorithm that can maximize the robustness of the value function (a measure of how good the agent's decisions are) at a rate of O(1/sqrt(T)), where T is the number of iterations of the algorithm.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a general and efficient framework for improving the robustness of reinforcement learning agents to changes in the environment. This is a significant contribution, as most previous works have relied on specific assumptions about the problem structure.
However, the paper does not address certain practical concerns, such as how to efficiently compute the worst-case environmental changes in large or complex state/action spaces. Additionally, the theoretical analysis assumes access to oracles for solving the minimax optimization problem, which may not be readily available in real-world applications.
Further research could explore ways to make the minimax optimization more scalable and efficient, as well as investigate the empirical performance of the proposed approach on realistic reinforcement learning benchmarks.
Conclusion
This research paper introduces a novel framework for making reinforcement learning agents more robust to changes in their environment. By formulating the problem as a minimax optimization, the resulting policies are optimized to perform well even in the face of adverse environmental conditions.
The theoretical analysis provides strong guarantees on the rate of improvement in the robustness of the value function, which is a significant advancement in the field of robust reinforcement learning. While there are still practical challenges to address, this work lays the foundation for developing more reliable and adaptable decision-making systems in an ever-changing world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Time-Constrained Robust MDPs
Adil Zouitine, David Bertoin, Pierre Clavier, Matthieu Geist, Emmanuel Rachelson
0
0
Robust reinforcement learning is essential for deploying reinforcement learning algorithms in real-world scenarios where environmental uncertainty predominates. Traditional robust reinforcement learning often depends on rectangularity assumptions, where adverse probability measures of outcome states are assumed to be independent across different states and actions. This assumption, rarely fulfilled in practice, leads to overly conservative policies. To address this problem, we introduce a new time-constrained robust MDP (TC-RMDP) formulation that considers multifactorial, correlated, and time-dependent disturbances, thus more accurately reflecting real-world dynamics. This formulation goes beyond the conventional rectangularity paradigm, offering new perspectives and expanding the analytical framework for robust RL. We propose three distinct algorithms, each using varying levels of environmental information, and evaluate them extensively on continuous control benchmarks. Our results demonstrate that these algorithms yield an efficient tradeoff between performance and robustness, outperforming traditional deep robust RL methods in time-constrained environments while preserving robustness in classical benchmarks. This study revisits the prevailing assumptions in robust RL and opens new avenues for developing more practical and realistic RL applications.
6/13/2024
🏅
Tackling Decision Processes with Non-Cumulative Objectives using Reinforcement Learning
Maximilian Nagele, Jan Olle, Thomas Fosel, Remmy Zen, Florian Marquardt
0
0
Markov decision processes (MDPs) are used to model a wide variety of applications ranging from game playing over robotics to finance. Their optimal policy typically maximizes the expected sum of rewards given at each step of the decision process. However, a large class of problems does not fit straightforwardly into this framework: Non-cumulative Markov decision processes (NCMDPs), where instead of the expected sum of rewards, the expected value of an arbitrary function of the rewards is maximized. Example functions include the maximum of the rewards or their mean divided by their standard deviation. In this work, we introduce a general mapping of NCMDPs to standard MDPs. This allows all techniques developed to find optimal policies for MDPs, such as reinforcement learning or dynamic programming, to be directly applied to the larger class of NCMDPs. Focusing on reinforcement learning, we show applications in a diverse set of tasks, including classical control, portfolio optimization in finance, and discrete optimization problems. Given our approach, we can improve both final performance and training time compared to relying on standard MDPs.
5/24/2024
Sample-Efficient Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in the Face of Environmental Uncertainty
Laixi Shi, Eric Mazumdar, Yuejie Chi, Adam Wierman
0
0
To overcome the sim-to-real gap in reinforcement learning (RL), learned policies must maintain robustness against environmental uncertainties. While robust RL has been widely studied in single-agent regimes, in multi-agent environments, the problem remains understudied -- despite the fact that the problems posed by environmental uncertainties are often exacerbated by strategic interactions. This work focuses on learning in distributionally robust Markov games (RMGs), a robust variant of standard Markov games, wherein each agent aims to learn a policy that maximizes its own worst-case performance when the deployed environment deviates within its own prescribed uncertainty set. This results in a set of robust equilibrium strategies for all agents that align with classic notions of game-theoretic equilibria. Assuming a non-adaptive sampling mechanism from a generative model, we propose a sample-efficient model-based algorithm (DRNVI) with finite-sample complexity guarantees for learning robust variants of various notions of game-theoretic equilibria. We also establish an information-theoretic lower bound for solving RMGs, which confirms the near-optimal sample complexity of DRNVI with respect to problem-dependent factors such as the size of the state space, the target accuracy, and the horizon length.
5/10/2024
Achieving Tractable Minimax Optimal Regret in Average Reward MDPs
Victor Boone, Zihan Zhang
0
0
In recent years, significant attention has been directed towards learning average-reward Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). However, existing algorithms either suffer from sub-optimal regret guarantees or computational inefficiencies. In this paper, we present the first tractable algorithm with minimax optimal regret of $widetilde{mathrm{O}}(sqrt{mathrm{sp}(h^*) S A T})$, where $mathrm{sp}(h^*)$ is the span of the optimal bias function $h^*$, $S times A$ is the size of the state-action space and $T$ the number of learning steps. Remarkably, our algorithm does not require prior information on $mathrm{sp}(h^*)$. Our algorithm relies on a novel subroutine, Projected Mitigated Extended Value Iteration (PMEVI), to compute bias-constrained optimal policies efficiently. This subroutine can be applied to various previous algorithms to improve regret bounds.
6/4/2024