Tackling Decision Processes with Non-Cumulative Objectives using Reinforcement Learning
2405.13609
0
0
🏅
Abstract
Markov decision processes (MDPs) are used to model a wide variety of applications ranging from game playing over robotics to finance. Their optimal policy typically maximizes the expected sum of rewards given at each step of the decision process. However, a large class of problems does not fit straightforwardly into this framework: Non-cumulative Markov decision processes (NCMDPs), where instead of the expected sum of rewards, the expected value of an arbitrary function of the rewards is maximized. Example functions include the maximum of the rewards or their mean divided by their standard deviation. In this work, we introduce a general mapping of NCMDPs to standard MDPs. This allows all techniques developed to find optimal policies for MDPs, such as reinforcement learning or dynamic programming, to be directly applied to the larger class of NCMDPs. Focusing on reinforcement learning, we show applications in a diverse set of tasks, including classical control, portfolio optimization in finance, and discrete optimization problems. Given our approach, we can improve both final performance and training time compared to relying on standard MDPs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Markov decision processes (MDPs) are used to model a wide range of applications, but a large class of problems does not fit this framework.
- Non-cumulative Markov decision processes (NCMDPs) aim to maximize the expected value of an arbitrary function of rewards, rather than the expected sum of rewards.
- This paper introduces a general mapping of NCMDPs to standard MDPs, allowing existing techniques like reinforcement learning and dynamic programming to be applied to this broader class of problems.
- The approach is demonstrated on a diverse set of tasks, including classical control, portfolio optimization, and discrete optimization, showing improvements in both final performance and training time compared to standard MDPs.
Plain English Explanation
Markov decision processes (MDPs) are a widely used framework for modeling and solving a variety of real-world problems, from game playing to robotics to finance. In an MDP, the goal is typically to find an optimal policy that maximizes the expected sum of rewards received at each step of the decision process.
However, there are many problems that don't fit neatly into this framework. These are known as non-cumulative Markov decision processes (NCMDPs). In an NCMDP, the goal is not to maximize the expected sum of rewards, but rather the expected value of an arbitrary function of the rewards. This could be the maximum of the rewards, the mean divided by the standard deviation, or some other custom metric.
This paper introduces a general way to map NCMDPs to standard MDPs. This is significant because it means that all the existing techniques developed for solving MDPs, such as reinforcement learning and dynamic programming, can now be directly applied to this broader class of problems.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a diverse set of tasks, including classical control problems, portfolio optimization in finance, and discrete optimization problems. They show that their method can improve both the final performance and the training time compared to relying solely on standard MDPs.
Technical Explanation
The key insight of this paper is the introduction of a general mapping from non-cumulative Markov decision processes (NCMDPs) to standard Markov decision processes (MDPs). NCMDPs are a broader class of problems where the goal is to maximize the expected value of an arbitrary function of the rewards, rather than the expected sum of rewards.
The researchers show that by transforming an NCMDP into an equivalent MDP, all the existing techniques developed for solving MDPs, such as reinforcement learning and dynamic programming, can be directly applied to this larger set of problems. This is a significant contribution, as it opens up a wide range of applications that were previously difficult to model and solve using traditional MDP-based methods.
To demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach, the researchers evaluate it on a diverse set of tasks, including classical control problems, portfolio optimization in finance, and discrete optimization problems. Their results show that their method can improve both the final performance and the training time compared to relying solely on standard MDPs.
Critical Analysis
The researchers have presented a novel and promising approach for solving a broader class of Markov decision processes that go beyond the standard framework of maximizing the expected sum of rewards. By mapping NCMDPs to MDPs, they have opened up a wide range of applications that were previously difficult to model and solve.
One potential limitation of the approach is that the transformation from an NCMDP to an equivalent MDP may not always be straightforward or efficient, especially for more complex objective functions. The researchers do not provide a detailed analysis of the computational complexity or scalability of their method, which would be important to understand its practical applicability.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the implications of the choice of the arbitrary reward function in an NCMDP. Different functions may lead to significantly different optimal policies, and it would be valuable to understand the tradeoffs and considerations involved in selecting an appropriate function for a given problem.
Further research could also investigate the robustness and sensitivity of the approach to factors such as noise, uncertainty, or non-stationarity in the underlying Markov decision process.
Overall, the researchers have presented an important step forward in expanding the capabilities of Markov decision processes, and their work opens up exciting avenues for future exploration and application in a wide range of domains.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a general mapping from non-cumulative Markov decision processes (NCMDPs) to standard Markov decision processes (MDPs). NCMDPs are a broader class of problems where the goal is to maximize the expected value of an arbitrary function of the rewards, rather than the expected sum of rewards.
By transforming an NCMDP into an equivalent MDP, the researchers have enabled the use of existing techniques like reinforcement learning and dynamic programming to be applied to this larger set of problems. This is a significant contribution, as it opens up a wide range of applications that were previously difficult to model and solve using traditional MDP-based methods.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a diverse set of tasks, including classical control, portfolio optimization, and discrete optimization problems. Their results show improvements in both final performance and training time compared to relying solely on standard MDPs.
This work represents an important step forward in expanding the capabilities of Markov decision processes, and it lays the groundwork for further exploration and application of these techniques in a wide variety of real-world domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📶
Solving Robust MDPs through No-Regret Dynamics
Etash Kumar Guha
0
0
Reinforcement Learning is a powerful framework for training agents to navigate different situations, but it is susceptible to changes in environmental dynamics. However, solving Markov Decision Processes that are robust to changes is difficult due to nonconvexity and size of action or state spaces. While most works have analyzed this problem by taking different assumptions on the problem, a general and efficient theoretical analysis is still missing. However, we generate a simple framework for improving robustness by solving a minimax iterative optimization problem where a policy player and an environmental dynamics player are playing against each other. Leveraging recent results in online nonconvex learning and techniques from improving policy gradient methods, we yield an algorithm that maximizes the robustness of the Value Function on the order of $mathcal{O}left(frac{1}{T^{frac{1}{2}}}right)$ where $T$ is the number of iterations of the algorithm.
6/21/2024
🏅
Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Average Reward Objective: Model-Based and Model-Free Algorithms
Vaneet Aggarwal, Washim Uddin Mondal, Qinbo Bai
0
0
Reinforcement Learning (RL) serves as a versatile framework for sequential decision-making, finding applications across diverse domains such as robotics, autonomous driving, recommendation systems, supply chain optimization, biology, mechanics, and finance. The primary objective in these applications is to maximize the average reward. Real-world scenarios often necessitate adherence to specific constraints during the learning process. This monograph focuses on the exploration of various model-based and model-free approaches for Constrained RL within the context of average reward Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). The investigation commences with an examination of model-based strategies, delving into two foundational methods - optimism in the face of uncertainty and posterior sampling. Subsequently, the discussion transitions to parametrized model-free approaches, where the primal-dual policy gradient-based algorithm is explored as a solution for constrained MDPs. The monograph provides regret guarantees and analyzes constraint violation for each of the discussed setups. For the above exploration, we assume the underlying MDP to be ergodic. Further, this monograph extends its discussion to encompass results tailored for weakly communicating MDPs, thereby broadening the scope of its findings and their relevance to a wider range of practical scenarios.
6/24/2024
Reinforcement Learning with Non-Cumulative Objective
Wei Cui, Wei Yu
0
0
In reinforcement learning, the objective is almost always defined as a emph{cumulative} function over the rewards along the process. However, there are many optimal control and reinforcement learning problems in various application fields, especially in communications and networking, where the objectives are not naturally expressed as summations of the rewards. In this paper, we recognize the prevalence of non-cumulative objectives in various problems, and propose a modification to existing algorithms for optimizing such objectives. Specifically, we dive into the fundamental building block for many optimal control and reinforcement learning algorithms: the Bellman optimality equation. To optimize a non-cumulative objective, we replace the original summation operation in the Bellman update rule with a generalized operation corresponding to the objective. Furthermore, we provide sufficient conditions on the form of the generalized operation as well as assumptions on the Markov decision process under which the globally optimal convergence of the generalized Bellman updates can be guaranteed. We demonstrate the idea experimentally with the bottleneck objective, i.e., the objectives determined by the minimum reward along the process, on classical optimal control and reinforcement learning tasks, as well as on two network routing problems on maximizing the flow rates.
4/15/2024
💬
A safe exploration approach to constrained Markov decision processes
Tingting Ni, Maryam Kamgarpour
0
0
We consider discounted infinite horizon constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs) where the goal is to find an optimal policy that maximizes the expected cumulative reward subject to expected cumulative constraints. Motivated by the application of CMDPs in online learning of safety-critical systems, we focus on developing a model-free and simulator-free algorithm that ensures constraint satisfaction during learning. To this end, we develop an interior point approach based on the log barrier function of the CMDP. Under the commonly assumed conditions of Fisher non-degeneracy and bounded transfer error of the policy parameterization, we establish the theoretical properties of the algorithm. In particular, in contrast to existing CMDP approaches that ensure policy feasibility only upon convergence, our algorithm guarantees the feasibility of the policies during the learning process and converges to the $varepsilon$-optimal policy with a sample complexity of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(varepsilon^{-6})$. In comparison to the state-of-the-art policy gradient-based algorithm, C-NPG-PDA, our algorithm requires an additional $mathcal{O}(varepsilon^{-2})$ samples to ensure policy feasibility during learning with the same Fisher non-degenerate parameterization.
5/24/2024