Stable Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Policies from Control Lyapunov Landscapes

2405.08756

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/15/2024 by Samuel Tesfazgi, Leonhard Sprandl, Armin Lederer, Sandra Hirche

🏅

Abstract

Learning from expert demonstrations to flexibly program an autonomous system with complex behaviors or to predict an agent's behavior is a powerful tool, especially in collaborative control settings. A common method to solve this problem is inverse reinforcement learning (IRL), where the observed agent, e.g., a human demonstrator, is assumed to behave according to the optimization of an intrinsic cost function that reflects its intent and informs its control actions. While the framework is expressive, it is also computationally demanding and generally lacks convergence guarantees. We therefore propose a novel, stability-certified IRL approach by reformulating the cost function inference problem to learning control Lyapunov functions (CLF) from demonstrations data. By additionally exploiting closed-form expressions for associated control policies, we are able to efficiently search the space of CLFs by observing the attractor landscape of the induced dynamics. For the construction of the inverse optimal CLFs, we use a Sum of Squares and formulate a convex optimization problem. We present a theoretical analysis of the optimality properties provided by the CLF and evaluate our approach using both simulated and real-world data.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel approach to Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) by reformulating the cost function inference problem as learning control Lyapunov functions (CLFs) from demonstration data.
  • The key idea is to exploit closed-form expressions for associated control policies to efficiently search the space of CLFs by observing the attractor landscape of the induced dynamics.
  • The authors present a theoretical analysis of the optimality properties provided by the CLF and evaluate their approach using both simulated and real-world data.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world settings, such as collaborative control, we want autonomous systems to learn complex behaviors by observing expert demonstrations. A common approach to this problem is Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL), where the system tries to infer the cost function that the expert is optimizing.

However, traditional IRL methods can be computationally expensive and lack strong convergence guarantees. To address these challenges, the authors propose a novel IRL approach that reformulates the problem as learning control Lyapunov functions (CLFs) from demonstration data.

The key insight is that by using closed-form expressions for the associated control policies, the system can efficiently search the space of CLFs by observing the "attractor landscape" of the induced dynamics. This allows the system to infer the expert's underlying cost function in a more stable and computationally efficient way.

The authors provide a theoretical analysis of the optimality properties of their CLF-based approach and evaluate it using both simulated and real-world data, demonstrating its effectiveness compared to traditional IRL methods.

Technical Explanation

The authors propose a novel Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) approach that reformulates the cost function inference problem as learning control Lyapunov functions (CLFs) from demonstration data.

The key innovation is the exploitation of closed-form expressions for the associated control policies, which allows the system to efficiently search the space of CLFs by observing the attractor landscape of the induced dynamics. This approach enables more stable and computationally efficient cost function inference compared to traditional IRL methods.

Specifically, the authors use a Sum of Squares optimization to construct the inverse optimal CLFs, formulating a convex optimization problem. They provide a theoretical analysis of the optimality properties of their CLF-based approach and evaluate it using both simulated and real-world data, demonstrating its effectiveness compared to existing IRL techniques.

Critical Analysis

The authors present a novel and promising approach to Inverse Reinforcement Learning that addresses some of the key limitations of traditional methods. By reformulating the problem as learning control Lyapunov functions, they are able to exploit closed-form expressions for the associated control policies, leading to improved computational efficiency and stability.

However, the paper does not discuss the potential limitations or caveats of their approach. For example, the authors do not mention how their method might perform in scenarios with high-dimensional state spaces or complex, non-linear dynamics. Additionally, while the theoretical analysis provides insights into the optimality properties of the CLF-based approach, it would be valuable to have a more detailed discussion of the assumptions and limitations of this analysis.

Further research could also explore ways to extend the approach to handle partial observability, noisy demonstrations, or other real-world challenges that often arise in practical applications of Inverse Reinforcement Learning. Incorporating these considerations could help strengthen the broader applicability and robustness of the proposed method.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel and promising approach to Inverse Reinforcement Learning that reformulates the cost function inference problem as learning control Lyapunov functions from demonstration data. By exploiting closed-form expressions for associated control policies, the authors are able to efficiently search the space of CLFs and infer the expert's underlying cost function in a more stable and computationally efficient way.

The theoretical analysis and experimental results suggest that this CLF-based IRL approach has the potential to significantly improve upon traditional IRL methods, particularly in collaborative control settings where learning from expert demonstrations is a key challenge. As the authors expand on the limitations and explore ways to address real-world complexities, this work could have important implications for the development of more capable and adaptable autonomous systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Hybrid Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Hybrid Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Juntao Ren, Gokul Swamy, Zhiwei Steven Wu, J. Andrew Bagnell, Sanjiban Choudhury

YC

0

Reddit

0

The inverse reinforcement learning approach to imitation learning is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it can enable learning from a smaller number of expert demonstrations with more robustness to error compounding than behavioral cloning approaches. On the other hand, it requires that the learner repeatedly solve a computationally expensive reinforcement learning (RL) problem. Often, much of this computation is wasted searching over policies very dissimilar to the expert's. In this work, we propose using hybrid RL -- training on a mixture of online and expert data -- to curtail unnecessary exploration. Intuitively, the expert data focuses the learner on good states during training, which reduces the amount of exploration required to compute a strong policy. Notably, such an approach doesn't need the ability to reset the learner to arbitrary states in the environment, a requirement of prior work in efficient inverse RL. More formally, we derive a reduction from inverse RL to expert-competitive RL (rather than globally optimal RL) that allows us to dramatically reduce interaction during the inner policy search loop while maintaining the benefits of the IRL approach. This allows us to derive both model-free and model-based hybrid inverse RL algorithms with strong policy performance guarantees. Empirically, we find that our approaches are significantly more sample efficient than standard inverse RL and several other baselines on a suite of continuous control tasks.

Read more

6/6/2024

🐍

A Unified Linear Programming Framework for Offline Reward Learning from Human Demonstrations and Feedback

Kihyun Kim, Jiawei Zhang, Asuman Ozdaglar, Pablo A. Parrilo

YC

0

Reddit

0

Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) are pivotal methodologies in reward learning, which involve inferring and shaping the underlying reward function of sequential decision-making problems based on observed human demonstrations and feedback. Most prior work in reward learning has relied on prior knowledge or assumptions about decision or preference models, potentially leading to robustness issues. In response, this paper introduces a novel linear programming (LP) framework tailored for offline reward learning. Utilizing pre-collected trajectories without online exploration, this framework estimates a feasible reward set from the primal-dual optimality conditions of a suitably designed LP, and offers an optimality guarantee with provable sample efficiency. Our LP framework also enables aligning the reward functions with human feedback, such as pairwise trajectory comparison data, while maintaining computational tractability and sample efficiency. We demonstrate that our framework potentially achieves better performance compared to the conventional maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) approach through analytical examples and numerical experiments.

Read more

6/5/2024

🏅

Convergence of a model-free entropy-regularized inverse reinforcement learning algorithm

Titouan Renard, Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Tingting Ni, Maryam Kamgarpour

YC

0

Reddit

0

Given a dataset of expert demonstrations, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to recover a reward for which the expert is optimal. This work proposes a model-free algorithm to solve entropy-regularized IRL problem. In particular, we employ a stochastic gradient descent update for the reward and a stochastic soft policy iteration update for the policy. Assuming access to a generative model, we prove that our algorithm is guaranteed to recover a reward for which the expert is $varepsilon$-optimal using $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{2})$ samples of the Markov decision process (MDP). Furthermore, with $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{4})$ samples we prove that the optimal policy corresponding to the recovered reward is $varepsilon$-close to the expert policy in total variation distance.

Read more

4/24/2024

Confidence Aware Inverse Constrained Reinforcement Learning

Confidence Aware Inverse Constrained Reinforcement Learning

Sriram Ganapathi Subramanian, Guiliang Liu, Mohammed Elmahgiubi, Kasra Rezaee, Pascal Poupart

YC

0

Reddit

0

In coming up with solutions to real-world problems, humans implicitly adhere to constraints that are too numerous and complex to be specified completely. However, reinforcement learning (RL) agents need these constraints to learn the correct optimal policy in these settings. The field of Inverse Constraint Reinforcement Learning (ICRL) deals with this problem and provides algorithms that aim to estimate the constraints from expert demonstrations collected offline. Practitioners prefer to know a measure of confidence in the estimated constraints, before deciding to use these constraints, which allows them to only use the constraints that satisfy a desired level of confidence. However, prior works do not allow users to provide the desired level of confidence for the inferred constraints. This work provides a principled ICRL method that can take a confidence level with a set of expert demonstrations and outputs a constraint that is at least as constraining as the true underlying constraint with the desired level of confidence. Further, unlike previous methods, this method allows a user to know if the number of expert trajectories is insufficient to learn a constraint with a desired level of confidence, and therefore collect more expert trajectories as required to simultaneously learn constraints with the desired level of confidence and a policy that achieves the desired level of performance.

Read more

6/26/2024