State of the Practice for Medical Imaging Software
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a broad overview of the current state of medical imaging software, including key challenges and trends.
- The researchers investigate research questions related to the development, deployment, and evaluation of medical imaging software.
- They draw insights from a comprehensive review of the literature as well as interviews with medical imaging experts.
Plain English Explanation
The paper State of the Practice for Medical Imaging Software examines the current landscape of software used for medical imaging. Medical imaging, such as X-rays, CT scans, and MRI, is an essential tool for diagnosing and treating a wide range of medical conditions. However, the software that powers these imaging technologies can be complex and constantly evolving.
The researchers wanted to understand the key challenges and trends in medical imaging software development, deployment, and evaluation. They reviewed a large body of existing research on the topic and also interviewed experts working in the field. This allowed them to paint a comprehensive picture of the "state of the practice" for medical imaging software.
Some of the core insights from the paper include the need for better data management and exchange systems to support collaboration, the importance of standardized processes for image management, and the potential of intelligent systems to assist with tasks like image analysis and diagnosis. The researchers also highlight ongoing challenges around regulatory approval, user experience, and the integration of AI-based technologies.
Technical Explanation
The paper "State of the Practice for Medical Imaging Software" provides a comprehensive review of the current landscape of software used in medical imaging. The researchers investigated three key research questions:
- What are the current practices and challenges in the development of medical imaging software?
- How is medical imaging software deployed and integrated into clinical workflows?
- What methods are used to evaluate the performance and quality of medical imaging software?
To answer these questions, the researchers conducted a thorough literature review and interviewed 20 experts working in the field of medical imaging software. This multi-pronged approach allowed them to gain a well-rounded understanding of the state of the practice.
The paper covers a wide range of topics, including data management, image processing algorithms, user interface design, regulatory approval, and the integration of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence. The researchers identified several key trends, such as the growing importance of standardized data exchange formats and the need for more streamlined image management workflows.
The researchers also discussed the various methods used to evaluate the performance and quality of medical imaging software, including intelligent systems for software project evaluation and the growing use of AI-based image analysis techniques.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-researched overview of the state of medical imaging software, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. One key limitation is the relatively small sample size of experts interviewed, which may not fully capture the diversity of perspectives in the field.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the technical and operational aspects of medical imaging software, but it does not delve deeply into the broader societal and ethical implications of these technologies. As medical imaging software becomes increasingly sophisticated, particularly with the integration of AI, there will be important considerations around issues like data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the impact on clinical decision-making.
The researchers also note that the rapidly evolving nature of medical imaging technology means that the insights presented in the paper may have a relatively short shelf life. Continued research and monitoring of this dynamic field will be necessary to keep pace with the latest developments.
Conclusion
Overall, the "State of the Practice for Medical Imaging Software" paper provides a valuable snapshot of the current state of the field, highlighting key challenges, trends, and areas for future innovation. The insights gleaned from this research could help guide the development and deployment of more robust, user-friendly, and clinically effective medical imaging software solutions. As the field continues to evolve, ongoing collaboration between researchers, developers, and healthcare providers will be crucial to ensure that medical imaging technologies continue to serve the needs of patients and clinicians.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
State of the Practice for Medical Imaging Software
W. Spencer Smith, Ao Dong, Jacques Carette, Michael D. Noseworthy
We selected 29 medical imaging projects from 48 candidates, assessed 10 software qualities by answering 108 questions for each software project, and interviewed 8 of the 29 development teams. Based on the quantitative data, we ranked the MI software with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The four top-ranked software products are 3D Slicer, ImageJ, Fiji, and OHIF Viewer. Generally, MI software is in a healthy state as shown by the following: we observed 88% of the documentation artifacts recommended by research software development guidelines, 100% of MI projects use version control tools, and developers appear to use the common quasi-agile research software development process. However, the current state of the practice deviates from the existing guidelines because of the rarity of some recommended artifacts, low usage of continuous integration (17% of the projects), low use of unit testing (about 50% of projects), and room for improvement with documentation (six of nine developers felt their documentation was not clear enough). From interviewing the developers, we identified five pain points and two qualities of potential concern: lack of development time, lack of funding, technology hurdles, ensuring correctness, usability, maintainability, and reproducibility. The interviewees proposed strategies to improve the state of the practice, to address the identified pain points, and to improve software quality. Combining their ideas with ours, we have the following list of recommendations: increase documentation, increase testing by enriching datasets, increase continuous integration usage, move to web applications, employ linters, use peer reviews, design for change, add assurance cases, and incorporate a Generate All Things approach.
Read more5/21/2024
0
A study on the adequacy of common IQA measures for medical images
Anna Breger, Clemens Karner, Ian Selby, Janek Grohl, Soren Dittmer, Edward Lilley, Judith Babar, Jake Beckford, Thomas R Else, Timothy J Sadler, Shahab Shahipasand, Arthikkaa Thavakumar, Michael Roberts, Carola-Bibiane Schonlieb
Image quality assessment (IQA) is standard practice in the development stage of novel machine learning algorithms that operate on images. The most commonly used IQA measures have been developed and tested for natural images, but not in the medical setting. Reported inconsistencies arising in medical images are not surprising, as they have different properties than natural images. In this study, we test the applicability of common IQA measures for medical image data by comparing their assessment to manually rated chest X-ray (5 experts) and photoacoustic image data (2 experts). Moreover, we include supplementary studies on grayscale natural images and accelerated brain MRI data. The results of all experiments show a similar outcome in line with previous findings for medical imaging: PSNR and SSIM in the default setting are in the lower range of the result list and HaarPSI outperforms the other tested measures in the overall performance. Also among the top performers in our medical experiments are the full reference measures FSIM, GMSD, LPIPS and MS-SSIM. Generally, the results on natural images yield considerably higher correlations, suggesting that the additional employment of tailored IQA measures for medical imaging algorithms is needed.
Read more8/21/2024
0
Charting the Path Forward: CT Image Quality Assessment -- An In-Depth Review
Siyi Xun, Qiaoyu Li, Xiaohong Liu, Guangtao Zhai, Mingxiang Wu, Tao Tan
Computed Tomography (CT) is a frequently utilized imaging technology that is employed in the clinical diagnosis of many disorders. However, clinical diagnosis, data storage, and management are posed huge challenges by a huge volume of non-homogeneous CT data in terms of imaging quality. As a result, the quality assessment of CT images is a crucial problem that demands consideration. The history, advancements in research, and current developments in CT image quality assessment (IQA) are examined in this paper. In this review, we collected and researched more than 500 CT-IQA publications published before August 2023. And we provide the visualization analysis of keywords and co-citations in the knowledge graph of these papers. Prospects and obstacles for the continued development of CT-IQA are also covered. At present, significant research branches in the CT-IQA domain include Phantom study, Artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction algorithm, Dose reduction opportunity, and Virtual monoenergetic reconstruction. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based CT-IQA also becomes a trend. It increases the accuracy of the CT scanning apparatus, amplifies the impact of the CT system reconstruction algorithm, and creates an effective algorithm for post-processing CT images. AI-based medical IQA offers excellent application opportunities in clinical work. AI can provide uniform quality assessment criteria and more comprehensive guidance amongst various healthcare facilities, and encourage them to identify one another's images. It will help lower the number of unnecessary tests and associated costs, and enhance the quality of medical imaging and assessment efficiency.
Read more5/2/2024
🖼️
0
Development and Evaluation of Dental Image Exchange and Management System: A User-Centered Perspective
B Rahimi, S Karimian, A Ghaznavi, M Jafari Heydarlou
Introduction: Systems that exist in the hospital or clinic settings are capable of providing services in the physical environment. These systems (e.g., Picture Archiving and communication systems) provide remote service for patients. To design such systems, we need some unique methods such as software development life cycle and different methods such as prototyping. Clinical setting: This study designs an image exchange system in the private dental sector of Urmia city using user-centered methods and prototyping. Methods: Information was collected based on each stage's software development life cycle. Interviews and observations were used to gather user-needs data, such as object-oriented programming for developing a Prototype. Results: The users' needs were determined to consider at the beginning. Ease of use, security, and mobile apps were their most essential needs. Then, the prototype was designed and evaluated in the focus group session. These steps continued until users were satisfied in the focus group. Eventually, after the users' consent, the prototype became the final system. Discussion: Instant access to Information, volunteering, user interface design, and usefulness were the most critical variables users considered. The advantage of this system also includes less radiation to the patient due to not losing and missing the clips of the patient's images. Conclusion: The success of such a system requires the consideration of end-users needs and their application to the system. In addition to this system, having an electronic health record can improve the treatment process and improve the work of the medical staff.
Read more4/23/2024