A Step Towards a Universal Method for Modeling and Implementing Cross-Organizational Business Processes
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a universal method for modeling and implementing cross-organizational business processes.
- The method combines the strengths of PASS (Process-Aware Information Systems) and BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation) to address the challenges of modeling and executing complex, cross-organizational workflows.
- The approach includes a modeling language, a workflow engine, and a code generator to facilitate the development and deployment of these processes.
Plain English Explanation
Businesses often need to work together on complex processes that span multiple organizations. This paper presents a new approach to modeling and implementing these cross-organizational business processes.
The key idea is to combine two existing concepts - PASS (Process-Aware Information Systems) and BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation). PASS provides a way to model business processes that involve multiple parties, while BPMN is a standard language for visually depicting these workflows.
The authors have developed a unified method that brings together the strengths of PASS and BPMN. This includes a modeling language that can capture the nuances of cross-organizational processes, a workflow engine to execute those processes, and a code generator to help implement the processes more easily.
The overall goal is to make it simpler for businesses to collaborate on complex workflows that involve multiple organizations. The method aims to provide a more universal approach compared to existing solutions, which may be limited in their ability to handle the challenges of cross-organizational processes.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel method for modeling and implementing cross-organizational business processes. It combines the strengths of PASS (Process-Aware Information Systems) and BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation) to address the unique challenges of these types of workflows.
The core components of the proposed approach include:
-
Modeling Language: The authors have developed a modeling language that can capture the nuances of cross-organizational processes. This includes support for representing different organizational entities, their interactions, and the flow of control and data across organizational boundaries.
-
Workflow Engine: The method includes a workflow engine that can execute the modeled processes. This engine is designed to handle the complexities of cross-organizational workflows, such as coordinating activities, managing exceptions, and ensuring data consistency across organizational boundaries.
-
Code Generator: To facilitate the implementation of these cross-organizational processes, the authors have also developed a code generator. This component can automatically generate executable code from the process models, reducing the effort required to deploy the workflows.
The authors demonstrate the applicability of their method through a case study involving a supply chain management scenario. They show how the proposed approach can be used to model and implement a complex, cross-organizational business process involving multiple parties.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to addressing the challenges of modeling and implementing cross-organizational business processes. The combination of PASS and BPMN appears to be a well-reasoned strategy, as it leverages the strengths of both frameworks to handle the unique requirements of these types of workflows.
However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of the method's performance and limitations. While the case study demonstrates the feasibility of the approach, it would be helpful to see a more extensive validation, such as comparisons to existing solutions or real-world deployments.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues related to security, data privacy, and governance in cross-organizational settings. These are crucial considerations when multiple organizations are collaborating on a shared process.
Further research could also explore the integration of machine learning or other advanced techniques to enhance the modeling and execution of cross-organizational business processes. This could lead to more intelligent and adaptable workflows that can better handle the complexities of real-world scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel method for modeling and implementing cross-organizational business processes. By combining the strengths of PASS and BPMN, the authors have developed a comprehensive approach that addresses the unique challenges of these types of workflows.
The key components of the method - the modeling language, workflow engine, and code generator - provide a promising framework for businesses to collaborate more effectively on complex, cross-organizational processes. While the paper demonstrates the feasibility of the approach, further research and validation are needed to fully assess its capabilities and limitations.
Overall, this work represents an important step towards a more universal solution for managing the challenges of cross-organizational business processes, which are becoming increasingly common in today's interconnected business landscape.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Step Towards a Universal Method for Modeling and Implementing Cross-Organizational Business Processes
Gerhard Zeisler, Tim Tobias Braunauer, Albert Fleischmann, Robert Singer
The widely adopted Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) is a cornerstone of industry standards for business process modeling. However, its ambiguous execution semantics often result in inconsistent interpretations, depending on the software used for implementation. In response, the Process Specification Language (PASS) provides formally defined semantics to overcome these interpretational challenges. Despite its clear advantages, PASS has not reached the same level of industry penetration as BPMN. This feasibility study proposes using PASS as an intermediary framework to translate and execute BPMN models. It describes the development of a prototype translator that converts specific BPMN elements into a format compatible with PASS. These models are then transformed into source code and executed in a bespoke workflow environment, marking a departure from traditional BPMN implementations. Our findings suggest that integrating PASS enhances compatibility across different modeling and execution tools and offers a more robust methodology for implementing business processes across organizations. This study lays the groundwork for more accurate and unified business process model executions, potentially transforming industry standards for process modeling and execution.
Read more6/19/2024
0
How well can large language models explain business processes?
Dirk Fahland, Fabiana Fournier, Lior Limonad, Inna Skarbovsky, Ava J. E. Swevels
Large Language Models (LLMs) are likely to play a prominent role in future AI-augmented business process management systems (ABPMSs) catering functionalities across all system lifecycle stages. One such system's functionality is Situation-Aware eXplainability (SAX), which relates to generating causally sound and yet human-interpretable explanations that take into account the process context in which the explained condition occurred. In this paper, we present the SAX4BPM framework developed to generate SAX explanations. The SAX4BPM suite consists of a set of services and a central knowledge repository. The functionality of these services is to elicit the various knowledge ingredients that underlie SAX explanations. A key innovative component among these ingredients is the causal process execution view. In this work, we integrate the framework with an LLM to leverage its power to synthesize the various input ingredients for the sake of improved SAX explanations. Since the use of LLMs for SAX is also accompanied by a certain degree of doubt related to its capacity to adequately fulfill SAX along with its tendency for hallucination and lack of inherent capacity to reason, we pursued a methodological evaluation of the quality of the generated explanations. To this aim, we developed a designated scale and conducted a rigorous user study. Our findings show that the input presented to the LLMs aided with the guard-railing of its performance, yielding SAX explanations having better-perceived fidelity. This improvement is moderated by the perception of trust and curiosity. More so, this improvement comes at the cost of the perceived interpretability of the explanation.
Read more7/25/2024
0
Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhanced Process Model Comprehension
Humam Kourani, Alessandro Berti, Jasmin Hennrich, Wolfgang Kratsch, Robin Weidlich, Chiao-Yun Li, Ahmad Arslan, Daniel Schuster, Wil M. P. van der Aalst
In Business Process Management (BPM), effectively comprehending process models is crucial yet poses significant challenges, particularly as organizations scale and processes become more complex. This paper introduces a novel framework utilizing the advanced capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance the interpretability of complex process models. We present different methods for abstracting business process models into a format accessible to LLMs, and we implement advanced prompting strategies specifically designed to optimize LLM performance within our framework. Additionally, we present a tool, AIPA, that implements our proposed framework and allows for conversational process querying. We evaluate our framework and tool by i) an automatic evaluation comparing different LLMs, model abstractions, and prompting strategies and ii) a user study designed to assess AIPA's effectiveness comprehensively. Results demonstrate our framework's ability to improve the accessibility and interpretability of process models, pioneering new pathways for integrating AI technologies into the BPM field.
Read more9/23/2024
0
Do Multimodal Foundation Models Understand Enterprise Workflows? A Benchmark for Business Process Management Tasks
Michael Wornow, Avanika Narayan, Ben Viggiano, Ishan S. Khare, Tathagat Verma, Tibor Thompson, Miguel Angel Fuentes Hernandez, Sudharsan Sundar, Chloe Trujillo, Krrish Chawla, Rongfei Lu, Justin Shen, Divya Nagaraj, Joshua Martinez, Vardhan Agrawal, Althea Hudson, Nigam H. Shah, Christopher Re
Existing ML benchmarks lack the depth and diversity of annotations needed for evaluating models on business process management (BPM) tasks. BPM is the practice of documenting, measuring, improving, and automating enterprise workflows. However, research has focused almost exclusively on one task - full end-to-end automation using agents based on multimodal foundation models (FMs) like GPT-4. This focus on automation ignores the reality of how most BPM tools are applied today - simply documenting the relevant workflow takes 60% of the time of the typical process optimization project. To address this gap we present WONDERBREAD, the first benchmark for evaluating multimodal FMs on BPM tasks beyond automation. Our contributions are: (1) a dataset containing 2928 documented workflow demonstrations; (2) 6 novel BPM tasks sourced from real-world applications ranging from workflow documentation to knowledge transfer to process improvement; and (3) an automated evaluation harness. Our benchmark shows that while state-of-the-art FMs can automatically generate documentation (e.g. recalling 88% of the steps taken in a video demonstration of a workflow), they struggle to re-apply that knowledge towards finer-grained validation of workflow completion (F1 < 0.3). We hope WONDERBREAD encourages the development of more human-centered AI tooling for enterprise applications and furthers the exploration of multimodal FMs for the broader universe of BPM tasks. We publish our dataset and experiments here: https://github.com/HazyResearch/wonderbread
Read more6/21/2024