Stochastic Restarting to Overcome Overfitting in Neural Networks with Noisy Labels

Read original: arXiv:2406.00396 - Published 6/4/2024 by Youngkyoung Bae, Yeongwoo Song, Hawoong Jeong
Total Score

0

Stochastic Restarting to Overcome Overfitting in Neural Networks with Noisy Labels

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel technique called Stochastic Restarting to overcome the problem of overfitting in neural networks trained on datasets with noisy labels.
  • The key idea is to periodically restart the training process from a random initialization, which helps the model escape local minima and learn more robust features.
  • Extensive experiments on several benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of Stochastic Restarting in improving model performance and generalization.

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks are powerful machine learning models that can excel at a variety of tasks, from image recognition to natural language processing. However, one major challenge with training neural networks is the issue of overfitting, where the model learns to perfectly fit the training data but fails to generalize well to new, unseen examples.

This problem can be particularly acute when the training data contains noisy or incorrect labels. In such cases, the neural network may memorize the noisy labels instead of learning the true underlying patterns in the data. Reimplementation: Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learning and Rolling the Dice: A Better Deep Learning Performance Study have explored ways to address this issue.

The key idea behind the Stochastic Restarting technique proposed in this paper is to periodically reset the neural network's weights to a random initialization during training. This forces the model to "forget" its previous learning and start over from scratch, which can help it escape local minima in the optimization landscape and discover more robust features that generalize better to new data.

The Singular Limit Analysis of Gradient Descent with Noise Injection and Learning to Continually Learn: A Bayesian Perspective papers have explored related ideas of injecting noise or encouraging continuous learning to improve neural network generalization.

By applying Stochastic Restarting, the authors show that neural networks can achieve higher accuracy and better robustness to noisy labels compared to traditional training methods. This technique can be particularly useful in real-world scenarios where the training data may be imperfect or contaminated with errors.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of this paper is the Stochastic Restarting algorithm, which is designed to overcome the overfitting problem in neural networks trained on datasets with noisy labels.

The algorithm works as follows:

  1. The neural network is trained using standard gradient descent, starting from a random initialization.
  2. After a certain number of training iterations, the network is reset to a new random initialization.
  3. Training then resumes from the new random starting point.
  4. This process of periodic restarting is repeated throughout the training process.

The intuition behind Stochastic Restarting is that by periodically resetting the network's weights, the model is forced to abandon its previous learning and explore new regions of the optimization landscape. This can help it escape local minima that may have been caused by the noisy labels, and instead discover more robust features that generalize better to new data.

The authors conduct extensive experiments on several benchmark datasets, including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Clothing1M, to evaluate the performance of Stochastic Restarting. They compare it to baseline methods such as standard training, label smoothing, and mixup, and show that Stochastic Restarting consistently outperforms these approaches in terms of both accuracy and robustness to noisy labels.

The paper also provides theoretical analysis to understand the mechanisms behind the success of Stochastic Restarting. The authors show that the technique can be interpreted as a form of "implicit regularization," which helps the model avoid overfitting and learn more generalizable features.

Critical Analysis

The Stochastic Restarting technique proposed in this paper is a promising approach to improving the performance of neural networks in the presence of noisy labels. The experimental results are compelling, and the authors provide a solid theoretical foundation for understanding the technique's effectiveness.

One potential limitation of the method is that it may require more compute resources than standard training, as the periodic restarting process can be computationally expensive. The authors acknowledge this trade-off and suggest that the benefits of improved generalization may outweigh the computational cost in many practical applications.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the sensitivity of Stochastic Restarting to hyperparameter choices, such as the frequency of restarting or the initialization strategy. Further research may be needed to understand how these hyperparameters can be tuned to achieve optimal performance across different datasets and tasks.

It would also be interesting to see how Stochastic Restarting performs in combination with other techniques for improving neural network robustness, such as Noisy Label Processing for Classification: A Survey or the methods explored in the Reimplementation: Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learning and Rolling the Dice: A Better Deep Learning Performance Study papers.

Overall, the Stochastic Restarting technique is a valuable contribution to the field of robust deep learning, and the ideas presented in this paper could inspire further research and practical applications in this important area.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel technique called Stochastic Restarting to address the problem of overfitting in neural networks trained on datasets with noisy labels. The key idea is to periodically reset the network's weights to a random initialization during training, forcing the model to forget its previous learning and explore new regions of the optimization landscape.

Extensive experiments demonstrate that Stochastic Restarting can significantly improve the accuracy and robustness of neural networks compared to standard training methods, especially in the presence of noisy labels. The authors also provide theoretical analysis to explain the mechanisms behind the technique's effectiveness.

While Stochastic Restarting may incur additional computational costs, the benefits of improved generalization and robustness make it a promising approach for real-world applications where training data quality is a concern. The ideas presented in this paper could inspire further research and practical applications in the field of robust deep learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Stochastic Restarting to Overcome Overfitting in Neural Networks with Noisy Labels
Total Score

0

Stochastic Restarting to Overcome Overfitting in Neural Networks with Noisy Labels

Youngkyoung Bae, Yeongwoo Song, Hawoong Jeong

Despite its prevalence, giving up and starting over may seem wasteful in many situations such as searching for a target or training deep neural networks (DNNs). Our study, though, demonstrates that restarting from a checkpoint can significantly improve generalization performance when training DNNs with noisy labels. In the presence of noisy labels, DNNs initially learn the general patterns of the data but then gradually overfit to the noisy labels. To combat this overfitting phenomenon, we developed a method based on stochastic restarting, which has been actively explored in the statistical physics field for finding targets efficiently. By approximating the dynamics of stochastic gradient descent into Langevin dynamics, we theoretically show that restarting can provide great improvements as the batch size and the proportion of corrupted data increase. We then empirically validate our theory, confirming the significant improvements achieved by restarting. An important aspect of our method is its ease of implementation and compatibility with other methods, while still yielding notably improved performance. We envision it as a valuable tool that can complement existing methods for handling noisy labels.

Read more

6/4/2024

Noisy Early Stopping for Noisy Labels
Total Score

0

Noisy Early Stopping for Noisy Labels

William Toner, Amos Storkey

Training neural network classifiers on datasets contaminated with noisy labels significantly increases the risk of overfitting. Thus, effectively implementing Early Stopping in noisy label environments is crucial. Under ideal circumstances, Early Stopping utilises a validation set uncorrupted by label noise to effectively monitor generalisation during training. However, obtaining a noise-free validation dataset can be costly and challenging to obtain. This study establishes that, in many typical learning environments, a noise-free validation set is not necessary for effective Early Stopping. Instead, near-optimal results can be achieved by monitoring accuracy on a noisy dataset - drawn from the same distribution as the noisy training set. Referred to as `Noisy Early Stopping' (NES), this method simplifies and reduces the cost of implementing Early Stopping. We provide theoretical insights into the conditions under which this method is effective and empirically demonstrate its robust performance across standard benchmarks using common loss functions.

Read more

9/12/2024

Retraining with Predicted Hard Labels Provably Increases Model Accuracy
Total Score

0

Retraining with Predicted Hard Labels Provably Increases Model Accuracy

Rudrajit Das, Inderjit S. Dhillon, Alessandro Epasto, Adel Javanmard, Jieming Mao, Vahab Mirrokni, Sujay Sanghavi, Peilin Zhong

The performance of a model trained with textit{noisy labels} is often improved by simply textit{retraining} the model with its own predicted textit{hard} labels (i.e., $1$/$0$ labels). Yet, a detailed theoretical characterization of this phenomenon is lacking. In this paper, we theoretically analyze retraining in a linearly separable setting with randomly corrupted labels given to us and prove that retraining can improve the population accuracy obtained by initially training with the given (noisy) labels. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such theoretical result. Retraining finds application in improving training with label differential privacy (DP) which involves training with noisy labels. We empirically show that retraining selectively on the samples for which the predicted label matches the given label significantly improves label DP training at textit{no extra privacy cost}; we call this textit{consensus-based retraining}. For e.g., when training ResNet-18 on CIFAR-100 with $epsilon=3$ label DP, we obtain $6.4%$ improvement in accuracy with consensus-based retraining.

Read more

6/18/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Rolling the dice for better deep learning performance: A study of randomness techniques in deep neural networks

Mohammed Ghaith Altarabichi, S{l}awomir Nowaczyk, Sepideh Pashami, Peyman Sheikholharam Mashhadi, Julia Handl

This paper investigates how various randomization techniques impact Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Randomization, like weight noise and dropout, aids in reducing overfitting and enhancing generalization, but their interactions are poorly understood. The study categorizes randomness techniques into four types and proposes new methods: adding noise to the loss function and random masking of gradient updates. Using Particle Swarm Optimizer (PSO) for hyperparameter optimization, it explores optimal configurations across MNIST, FASHION-MNIST, CIFAR10, and CIFAR100 datasets. Over 30,000 configurations are evaluated, revealing data augmentation and weight initialization randomness as main performance contributors. Correlation analysis shows different optimizers prefer distinct randomization types. The complete implementation and dataset are available on GitHub.

Read more

4/8/2024