Summaries, Highlights, and Action items: Design, implementation and evaluation of an LLM-powered meeting recap system

Overview

• Meetings play a critical role in coordinating work.
• Due to the shift to hybrid and remote work, more meetings are happening online.
• This has led to new problems and new opportunities.
• Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) for dialog summarization have the potential to improve the meeting experience.
• However, these LLMs face technological limitations due to long transcripts and inability to capture diverse recap needs.

Plain English Explanation

In-person meetings have long been a crucial part of how organizations and teams coordinate their work. However, the shift to hybrid and remote work has meant that more meetings are now happening online in Computer Mediated Spaces. This has created both new challenges and new opportunities.

On the one hand, people are spending more time in less engaging online meetings, which can be draining. On the other hand, new technologies like automated transcription/captioning and recap support offer ways to improve the meeting experience.

In particular, recent advances in large language models (LLMs) for dialog summarization have the potential to reduce individual meeting load and increase the clarity and alignment of meeting outputs. These AI systems could automatically summarize key points and action items, helping everyone stay on the same page.

However, these LLM-based systems face some technical limitations. Long meeting transcripts can be challenging for them to process, and they may struggle to capture the diverse recap needs of different participants based on their specific context and roles. To address these gaps, the researchers designed, implemented, and evaluated an AI-powered meeting recap system.

Technical Explanation

The researchers first conceptualized two key representations for meeting recaps: important highlights and a structured, hierarchical minutes view. They then developed a system to operationalize these representations using dialogue summarization as the underlying technology.

To evaluate the effectiveness of this system, the researchers worked with seven users in the context of their regular work meetings. The findings showed promise in using LLM-based dialogue summarization for meeting recaps, with both the highlight and minutes view representations proving useful in different contexts.

However, the researchers also identified some key limitations of the current LLM-based approach. The system still lacked a deep understanding of what was personally relevant to each participant, and it sometimes missed important details or made detrimental mis-attributions that could impact group dynamics.

The researchers saw opportunities for collaboration between the AI system and meeting participants, such as through a shared recap document that builds on the system's high-quality summary. They also highlighted the need for the AI to learn and improve from these natural interactions to better understand personal relevance and improve summarization quality over time.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several important caveats and limitations in their work. While the LLM-based meeting recap system showed promise, it still struggles with understanding the personal context and relevance for each participant. This is a significant challenge, as meeting participants often have different goals, priorities, and information needs based on their roles and responsibilities.

Additionally, the system's inability to consistently capture all important details, and the potential for harmful mis-attributions, are concerning issues that need to be addressed. These limitations could undermine the system's usefulness and even negatively impact group dynamics if not handled carefully.

The researchers rightly identify the need for the AI system to learn and improve through ongoing collaboration with users. This co-creative approach, where the system learns from natural interactions, is crucial for overcoming the limitations related to personal relevance and summarization quality.

Further research could explore ways to better model and represent individual participant context, as well as techniques for ensuring high-fidelity summarization that maintains the integrity of the original discussion. Exploring the integration of the recap system with other collaboration tools, such as shared documents or task management systems, may also yield valuable insights.

Conclusion

This research highlights both the potential and the current limitations of using LLM-based dialogue summarization for improving the meeting experience. While the proposed meeting recap system shows promise, the researchers identify key challenges around understanding personal relevance and maintaining summarization quality.

Addressing these limitations through ongoing collaboration between the AI system and meeting participants is a promising avenue for future development. By learning from natural interactions and continuously improving its capabilities, the system can become a more effective partner in helping teams stay aligned, reduce meeting load, and make the most of their time together - whether in-person or in Computer Mediated Spaces.

As organizations continue to navigate the shift to hybrid and remote work, innovative AI-powered tools like this meeting recap system could play a crucial role in supporting productive and engaging collaboration.