Surrogate uncertainty estimation for your time series forecasting black-box: learn when to trust

Read original: arXiv:2302.02834 - Published 9/11/2024 by Leonid Erlygin, Vladimir Zholobov, Valeriia Baklanova, Evgeny Sokolovskiy, Alexey Zaytsev
Total Score

0

👨‍🏫

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Machine learning models are essential for time series forecasting, but often lack point uncertainty estimates
  • Incorporating uncertainty estimates is crucial for risk management, model selection, and decision-making
  • This research introduces a method for efficient uncertainty estimation using a surrogate Gaussian process regression model
  • The approach enhances any base regression model with reasonable uncertainty estimates, without making data-specific assumptions

Plain English Explanation

Time series forecasting is the process of predicting future values based on past data. Machine learning models are commonly used for this task, as they can identify complex patterns and make accurate predictions.

However, these models often fall short in one important aspect: they don't provide estimates of the uncertainty associated with their predictions. Knowing the level of uncertainty is crucial for making informed decisions. For example, if a model predicts a future value with a high degree of uncertainty, it would be risky to base a critical business decision on that prediction alone.

To address this issue, the researchers developed a new method that can enhance any base regression model (such as linear regression, ARIMA, or a neural network) with reasonable uncertainty estimates. They use a "surrogate" Gaussian process regression model, which essentially creates a secondary model that learns to estimate the uncertainty of the primary model's predictions.

The key advantage of this approach is that it is computationally efficient - it only requires training one additional surrogate model, rather than having to run multiple models or simulations. Additionally, it doesn't make any assumptions about the underlying data, making it a versatile and broadly applicable technique.

The researchers tested their method on various time series forecasting datasets and found that it consistently outperformed both bootstrap-based and built-in uncertainty estimation methods, across a range of base model types. This suggests that their surrogate model-based approach is a valuable tool for improving the reliability and robustness of time series forecasting.

Technical Explanation

The researchers introduce a method for efficiently estimating the uncertainty of predictions made by any base regression model used for time series forecasting. They employ a surrogate Gaussian process regression model, which acts as a secondary model that learns to estimate the uncertainty of the primary model's outputs.

The key benefits of this approach are:

  1. Computational Efficiency: The method only requires training one additional surrogate model, rather than having to run multiple models or simulations to estimate uncertainty.
  2. Minimal Assumptions: The technique does not make any data-specific assumptions, making it a versatile and broadly applicable solution.
  3. Black Box Compatibility: The method only requires the base regression model and its training data, without needing access to the model's internal workings.

In their experiments, the researchers evaluated the performance of their surrogate model-based uncertainty estimation technique using various time series forecasting datasets. They compared it to both bootstrap-based and built-in uncertainty estimation methods, across a range of base model types (linear regression, ARIMA, gradient boosting, and neural networks).

The results demonstrate that the researchers' approach consistently delivers significantly more accurate confidence intervals than the other methods, particularly in a medium-data regime. This suggests that their surrogate model-based technique is a valuable tool for improving the reliability and robustness of time series forecasting, by providing well-calibrated uncertainty estimates.

Critical Analysis

The researchers present a novel and computationally efficient method for uncertainty estimation in time series forecasting. By employing a surrogate Gaussian process regression model, they are able to enhance any base regression model with reasonable uncertainty estimates, without making data-specific assumptions.

One potential limitation of the approach is that it relies on the availability of a base regression model and its training data. In some cases, these may not be readily accessible, particularly for complex models or proprietary systems. Additionally, the effectiveness of the surrogate model in estimating uncertainty may be dependent on the quality and characteristics of the base model.

The researchers acknowledge that their experiments were conducted on a medium-data regime, and further research may be needed to assess the performance of their method in low-data or high-data scenarios. Additionally, they suggest that exploring the use of more advanced surrogate modeling techniques, such as data-driven surrogate models or uncertainty-aware surrogate models, could be a fruitful area for future work.

Overall, the researchers have presented a promising approach for addressing the important issue of uncertainty estimation in time series forecasting. Their method offers a computationally efficient and versatile solution, with the potential to improve the reliability and robustness of forecasting models across a wide range of applications.

Conclusion

This research introduces a novel method for efficiently estimating the uncertainty of predictions made by machine learning models in time series forecasting. By employing a surrogate Gaussian process regression model, the approach is able to enhance any base regression model with reasonable uncertainty estimates, without making data-specific assumptions.

The researchers' experimental results demonstrate that their surrogate model-based technique consistently outperforms both bootstrap-based and built-in uncertainty estimation methods, across a range of base model types. This suggests that their approach is a valuable tool for improving the reliability and robustness of time series forecasting, by providing well-calibrated uncertainty estimates to support informed decision-making and risk management.

While the method shows promise, further research may be needed to assess its performance in low-data or high-data scenarios, and to explore the use of more advanced surrogate modeling techniques. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in addressing a critical gap in the field of time series forecasting.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👨‍🏫

Total Score

0

Surrogate uncertainty estimation for your time series forecasting black-box: learn when to trust

Leonid Erlygin, Vladimir Zholobov, Valeriia Baklanova, Evgeny Sokolovskiy, Alexey Zaytsev

Machine learning models play a vital role in time series forecasting. These models, however, often overlook an important element: point uncertainty estimates. Incorporating these estimates is crucial for effective risk management, informed model selection, and decision-making.To address this issue, our research introduces a method for uncertainty estimation. We employ a surrogate Gaussian process regression model. It enhances any base regression model with reasonable uncertainty estimates. This approach stands out for its computational efficiency. It only necessitates training one supplementary surrogate and avoids any data-specific assumptions. Furthermore, this method for work requires only the presence of the base model as a black box and its respective training data. The effectiveness of our approach is supported by experimental results. Using various time-series forecasting data, we found that our surrogate model-based technique delivers significantly more accurate confidence intervals. These techniques outperform both bootstrap-based and built-in methods in a medium-data regime. This superiority holds across a range of base model types, including a linear regression, ARIMA, gradient boosting and a neural network.

Read more

9/11/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

Efficient Learning of Accurate Surrogates for Simulations of Complex Systems

A. Diaw, M. McKerns, I. Sagert, L. G. Stanton, M. S. Murillo

Machine learning methods are increasingly used to build computationally inexpensive surrogates for complex physical models. The predictive capability of these surrogates suffers when data are noisy, sparse, or time-dependent. As we are interested in finding a surrogate that provides valid predictions of any potential future model evaluations, we introduce an online learning method empowered by optimizer-driven sampling. The method has two advantages over current approaches. First, it ensures that all turning points on the model response surface are included in the training data. Second, after any new model evaluations, surrogates are tested and retrained (updated) if the score drops below a validity threshold. Tests on benchmark functions reveal that optimizer-directed sampling generally outperforms traditional sampling methods in terms of accuracy around local extrema, even when the scoring metric favors overall accuracy. We apply our method to simulations of nuclear matter to demonstrate that highly accurate surrogates for the nuclear equation of state can be reliably auto-generated from expensive calculations using a few model evaluations.

Read more

5/20/2024

Uncertainty Quantification of Pre-Trained and Fine-Tuned Surrogate Models using Conformal Prediction
Total Score

0

Uncertainty Quantification of Pre-Trained and Fine-Tuned Surrogate Models using Conformal Prediction

Vignesh Gopakumar, Ander Gray, Joel Oskarsson, Lorenzo Zanisi, Stanislas Pamela, Daniel Giles, Matt Kusner, Marc Peter Deisenroth

Data-driven surrogate models have shown immense potential as quick, inexpensive approximations to complex numerical and experimental modelling tasks. However, most surrogate models characterising physical systems do not quantify their uncertainty, rendering their predictions unreliable, and needing further validation. Though Bayesian approximations offer some solace in estimating the error associated with these models, they cannot provide they cannot provide guarantees, and the quality of their inferences depends on the availability of prior information and good approximations to posteriors for complex problems. This is particularly pertinent to multi-variable or spatio-temporal problems. Our work constructs and formalises a conformal prediction framework that satisfies marginal coverage for spatio-temporal predictions in a model-agnostic manner, requiring near-zero computational costs. The paper provides an extensive empirical study of the application of the framework to ascertain valid error bars that provide guaranteed coverage across the surrogate model's domain of operation. The application scope of our work extends across a large range of spatio-temporal models, ranging from solving partial differential equations to weather forecasting. Through the applications, the paper looks at providing statistically valid error bars for deterministic models, as well as crafting guarantees to the error bars of probabilistic models. The paper concludes with a viable conformal prediction formalisation that provides guaranteed coverage of the surrogate model, regardless of model architecture, and its training regime and is unbothered by the curse of dimensionality.

Read more

8/20/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization

Haoxian Chen, Henry Lam

Bayesian Optimization is a popular approach for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Its key idea is to use a surrogate model to approximate the objective and, importantly, quantify the associated uncertainty that allows a sequential search of query points that balance exploitation-exploration. Gaussian process (GP) has been a primary candidate for the surrogate model, thanks to its Bayesian-principled uncertainty quantification power and modeling flexibility. However, its challenges have also spurred an array of alternatives whose convergence properties could be more opaque. Motivated by these, we study in this paper an axiomatic framework that elicits the minimal requirements to guarantee black-box optimization convergence that could apply beyond GP-based methods. Moreover, we leverage the design freedom in our framework, which we call Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization, to construct empirically superior algorithms. In particular, we show how using simple local regression, and a suitable randomized prior construction to quantify uncertainty, not only guarantees convergence but also consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks in examples ranging from high-dimensional synthetic experiments to realistic hyperparameter tuning and robotic applications.

Read more

6/21/2024