Uncertainty Quantification of Pre-Trained and Fine-Tuned Surrogate Models using Conformal Prediction
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of conformal prediction to quantify the uncertainty of pre-trained and fine-tuned surrogate models.
- Surrogate models are approximations of complex systems that are computationally faster to evaluate.
- Conformal prediction is a technique that provides valid prediction intervals, meaning the true value is guaranteed to be within the predicted interval with a specified confidence level.
- The authors investigate how conformal prediction can be used to quantify uncertainty in both pre-trained and fine-tuned surrogate models.
Plain English Explanation
When working with complex systems, it's often useful to create simplified "surrogate" models that can be evaluated more quickly. These surrogate models can be used to make predictions about the complex system. However, it's important to understand the uncertainty associated with these surrogate model predictions.
Conformal prediction is a technique that can provide valid prediction intervals for a model's outputs. This means that the true value is guaranteed to be within the predicted interval with a specified confidence level. The authors of this paper explored how conformal prediction can be used to quantify the uncertainty of both pre-trained and fine-tuned surrogate models.
Pre-trained models are those that have been developed using a large, general dataset, while fine-tuned models have been further trained on a more specific dataset. The paper examines the uncertainty characteristics of both types of surrogate models and how conformal prediction can be applied to understand their reliability.
Technical Explanation
The paper first provides an overview of conformal prediction and how it can be used to obtain valid prediction intervals for machine learning models. The authors then describe two case studies where they apply conformal prediction to quantify the uncertainty of pre-trained and fine-tuned surrogate models.
In the first case study, the authors use a pre-trained surrogate model for a computational fluid dynamics problem. They demonstrate how conformal prediction can be used to obtain valid prediction intervals for the surrogate model's outputs, which allows them to quantify the model's uncertainty.
In the second case study, the authors fine-tune a pre-trained surrogate model for a different computational fluid dynamics problem. They show that conformal prediction can also be applied to the fine-tuned model to obtain valid prediction intervals, providing insights into how the fine-tuning process affects the model's uncertainty characteristics.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough investigation of using conformal prediction to quantify the uncertainty of both pre-trained and fine-tuned surrogate models. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through two relevant case studies.
One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses on computational fluid dynamics problems, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other domains. It would be interesting to see the authors apply their methodology to a wider range of surrogate modeling applications to further assess its versatility.
Additionally, the paper does not extensively discuss the computational overhead or practical considerations of implementing conformal prediction in real-world scenarios. Further research could explore the trade-offs and practical implications of using conformal prediction for uncertainty quantification in surrogate modeling.
Conclusion
This paper presents a compelling approach for quantifying the uncertainty of pre-trained and fine-tuned surrogate models using conformal prediction. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this technique through two case studies, providing insights into how the uncertainty characteristics of surrogate models can be better understood.
The findings of this research have important implications for fields that rely on surrogate modeling, such as computational engineering and climate science. By leveraging conformal prediction, practitioners can obtain reliable and well-calibrated uncertainty estimates for their surrogate model predictions, leading to more informed decision-making and a better understanding of the limitations of these simplified models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Uncertainty Quantification of Pre-Trained and Fine-Tuned Surrogate Models using Conformal Prediction
Vignesh Gopakumar, Ander Gray, Joel Oskarsson, Lorenzo Zanisi, Stanislas Pamela, Daniel Giles, Matt Kusner, Marc Peter Deisenroth
Data-driven surrogate models have shown immense potential as quick, inexpensive approximations to complex numerical and experimental modelling tasks. However, most surrogate models characterising physical systems do not quantify their uncertainty, rendering their predictions unreliable, and needing further validation. Though Bayesian approximations offer some solace in estimating the error associated with these models, they cannot provide they cannot provide guarantees, and the quality of their inferences depends on the availability of prior information and good approximations to posteriors for complex problems. This is particularly pertinent to multi-variable or spatio-temporal problems. Our work constructs and formalises a conformal prediction framework that satisfies marginal coverage for spatio-temporal predictions in a model-agnostic manner, requiring near-zero computational costs. The paper provides an extensive empirical study of the application of the framework to ascertain valid error bars that provide guaranteed coverage across the surrogate model's domain of operation. The application scope of our work extends across a large range of spatio-temporal models, ranging from solving partial differential equations to weather forecasting. Through the applications, the paper looks at providing statistically valid error bars for deterministic models, as well as crafting guarantees to the error bars of probabilistic models. The paper concludes with a viable conformal prediction formalisation that provides guaranteed coverage of the surrogate model, regardless of model architecture, and its training regime and is unbothered by the curse of dimensionality.
Read more8/20/2024
🔮
0
A comparative study of conformal prediction methods for valid uncertainty quantification in machine learning
Nicolas Dewolf
In the past decades, most work in the area of data analysis and machine learning was focused on optimizing predictive models and getting better results than what was possible with existing models. To what extent the metrics with which such improvements were measured were accurately capturing the intended goal, whether the numerical differences in the resulting values were significant, or whether uncertainty played a role in this study and if it should have been taken into account, was of secondary importance. Whereas probability theory, be it frequentist or Bayesian, used to be the gold standard in science before the advent of the supercomputer, it was quickly replaced in favor of black box models and sheer computing power because of their ability to handle large data sets. This evolution sadly happened at the expense of interpretability and trustworthiness. However, while people are still trying to improve the predictive power of their models, the community is starting to realize that for many applications it is not so much the exact prediction that is of importance, but rather the variability or uncertainty. The work in this dissertation tries to further the quest for a world where everyone is aware of uncertainty, of how important it is and how to embrace it instead of fearing it. A specific, though general, framework that allows anyone to obtain accurate uncertainty estimates is singled out and analysed. Certain aspects and applications of the framework -- dubbed `conformal prediction' -- are studied in detail. Whereas many approaches to uncertainty quantification make strong assumptions about the data, conformal prediction is, at the time of writing, the only framework that deserves the title `distribution-free'. No parametric assumptions have to be made and the nonparametric results also hold without having to resort to the law of large numbers in the asymptotic regime.
Read more5/6/2024
0
Valid Error Bars for Neural Weather Models using Conformal Prediction
Vignesh Gopakumar, Joel Oskarrson, Ander Gray, Lorenzo Zanisi, Stanislas Pamela, Daniel Giles, Matt Kusner, Marc Deisenroth
Neural weather models have shown immense potential as inexpensive and accurate alternatives to physics-based models. However, most models trained to perform weather forecasting do not quantify the uncertainty associated with their forecasts. This limits the trust in the model and the usefulness of the forecasts. In this work we construct and formalise a conformal prediction framework as a post-processing method for estimating this uncertainty. The method is model-agnostic and gives calibrated error bounds for all variables, lead times and spatial locations. No modifications are required to the model and the computational cost is negligible compared to model training. We demonstrate the usefulness of the conformal prediction framework on a limited area neural weather model for the Nordic region. We further explore the advantages of the framework for deterministic and probabilistic models.
Read more6/21/2024
🔮
0
Conformal Prediction for Natural Language Processing: A Survey
Margarida M. Campos, Ant'onio Farinhas, Chrysoula Zerva, M'ario A. T. Figueiredo, Andr'e F. T. Martins
The rapid proliferation of large language models and natural language processing (NLP) applications creates a crucial need for uncertainty quantification to mitigate risks such as hallucinations and to enhance decision-making reliability in critical applications. Conformal prediction is emerging as a theoretically sound and practically useful framework, combining flexibility with strong statistical guarantees. Its model-agnostic and distribution-free nature makes it particularly promising to address the current shortcomings of NLP systems that stem from the absence of uncertainty quantification. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of conformal prediction techniques, their guarantees, and existing applications in NLP, pointing to directions for future research and open challenges.
Read more5/6/2024