A survey on robustness in trajectory prediction for autonomous vehicles
2402.01397
0
0
Abstract
Autonomous vehicles rely on accurate trajectory prediction to inform decision-making processes related to navigation and collision avoidance. However, current trajectory prediction models show signs of overfitting, which may lead to unsafe or suboptimal behavior. To address these challenges, this paper presents a comprehensive framework that categorizes and assesses the definitions and strategies used in the literature on evaluating and improving the robustness of trajectory prediction models. This involves a detailed exploration of various approaches, including data slicing methods, perturbation techniques, model architecture changes, and post-training adjustments. In the literature, we see many promising methods for increasing robustness, which are necessary for safe and reliable autonomous driving.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey on the topic of robustness in trajectory prediction for autonomous vehicles.
- It examines the importance of robust trajectory prediction and the various challenges and approaches in this field.
- The paper covers key aspects such as the need for robust prediction, the impact of environmental factors, and the latest techniques and research directions.
Plain English Explanation
Autonomous vehicles rely heavily on their ability to accurately predict the future movements of other objects, such as other cars, pedestrians, and cyclists, in order to navigate safely and effectively. However, this trajectory prediction task is extremely challenging, as the behavior of these moving objects can be unpredictable and influenced by various environmental factors.
The paper explores the concept of "robustness" in the context of trajectory prediction. Robustness refers to the ability of a system to maintain its performance and reliability even in the face of unexpected or adverse conditions. In the case of autonomous vehicles, robust trajectory prediction is crucial to ensure the safety and reliability of the vehicle's decision-making and control systems.
The paper delves into the different factors that can impact the robustness of trajectory prediction, such as link to "Evaluating Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction Methods with Respect to Prediction Horizon" environmental conditions, sensor limitations, and the inherent uncertainty of human behavior. It examines how researchers are working to develop link to "Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Vehicle Using Iterative Reward" and link to "Online Spatial-Temporal Graph Trajectory Planner for Autonomous Vehicles" more robust trajectory prediction models that can adapt to these challenges.
The paper also discusses the potential impact of emerging technologies, such as link to "TRACT: Training Dynamics-Aware Contrastive Learning Framework" and link to "Transfer Learning Study of Motion Transformer-Based Trajectory Prediction", on improving the robustness of trajectory prediction systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive survey on the topic of robustness in trajectory prediction for autonomous vehicles. It begins by highlighting the critical importance of robust trajectory prediction, as it directly impacts the safety and reliability of autonomous driving systems.
The paper then delves into the various challenges and factors that can influence the robustness of trajectory prediction. These include environmental conditions, sensor limitations, and the inherent unpredictability of human behavior. The authors discuss how these factors can introduce uncertainty and variability into the prediction process, making it difficult to maintain accurate and reliable trajectories.
To address these challenges, the paper examines the latest research and techniques in the field of robust trajectory prediction. This includes the development of advanced machine learning models, such as link to "Evaluating Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction Methods with Respect to Prediction Horizon", that can better adapt to changing environmental conditions and handle the complexities of human behavior.
The paper also explores the potential impact of emerging technologies, such as link to "Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Vehicle Using Iterative Reward" and link to "Online Spatial-Temporal Graph Trajectory Planner for Autonomous Vehicles", on improving the robustness of trajectory prediction systems. These technologies offer new approaches and tools for processing and interpreting sensor data, modeling dynamic environments, and making more informed predictions.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-researched survey of the challenges and approaches related to robust trajectory prediction for autonomous vehicles. However, the authors acknowledge that there are still several limitations and areas for further research in this field.
One key limitation mentioned is the difficulty in accurately modeling and predicting the behavior of humans, who can be inherently unpredictable and influenced by a wide range of factors. The paper suggests that more advanced techniques, such as link to "TRACT: Training Dynamics-Aware Contrastive Learning Framework" and link to "Transfer Learning Study of Motion Transformer-Based Trajectory Prediction", may be needed to better capture the complexity of human behavior and improve the robustness of trajectory prediction.
Additionally, the paper highlights the need for more extensive testing and evaluation of robust trajectory prediction systems in real-world, dynamic environments. While the current research has shown promising results in controlled settings, the authors emphasize the importance of validating the performance and reliability of these systems in realistic, unpredictable scenarios.
Overall, the paper provides a valuable and comprehensive overview of the state of the art in robust trajectory prediction for autonomous vehicles. By identifying the key challenges and emerging research directions, it offers a solid foundation for further advancements in this critical area of autonomous driving technology.
Conclusion
This paper provides a thorough survey of the field of robust trajectory prediction for autonomous vehicles. It highlights the critical importance of accurate and reliable trajectory prediction in ensuring the safe and effective operation of autonomous driving systems. The paper examines the various factors that can impact the robustness of trajectory prediction, such as environmental conditions, sensor limitations, and the unpredictability of human behavior.
The paper also explores the latest research and techniques being developed to address these challenges, including advanced machine learning models and emerging technologies. While the current research has made significant progress, the paper identifies areas for further exploration, such as better modeling of human behavior and more extensive real-world testing.
By providing a comprehensive overview of the state of the art in robust trajectory prediction, this paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working to advance the field of autonomous driving technology. Its insights and findings can help guide future research and development efforts, ultimately contributing to the creation of safer and more reliable autonomous vehicles.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
Hacking Predictors Means Hacking Cars: Using Sensitivity Analysis to Identify Trajectory Prediction Vulnerabilities for Autonomous Driving Security
Marsalis Gibson, David Babazadeh, Claire Tomlin, Shankar Sastry
0
0
Adversarial attacks on learning-based multi-modal trajectory predictors have already been demonstrated. However, there are still open questions about the effects of perturbations on inputs other than state histories, and how these attacks impact downstream planning and control. In this paper, we conduct a sensitivity analysis on two trajectory prediction models, Trajectron++ and AgentFormer. The analysis reveals that between all inputs, almost all of the perturbation sensitivities for both models lie only within the most recent position and velocity states. We additionally demonstrate that, despite dominant sensitivity on state history perturbations, an undetectable image map perturbation made with the Fast Gradient Sign Method can induce large prediction error increases in both models, revealing that these trajectory predictors are, in fact, susceptible to image-based attacks. Using an optimization-based planner and example perturbations crafted from sensitivity results, we show how these attacks can cause a vehicle to come to a sudden stop from moderate driving speeds.
5/22/2024
🔮
A Cognitive-Driven Trajectory Prediction Model for Autonomous Driving in Mixed Autonomy Environment
Haicheng Liao, Zhenning Li, Chengyue Wang, Bonan Wang, Hanlin Kong, Yanchen Guan, Guofa Li, Zhiyong Cui, Chengzhong Xu
0
0
As autonomous driving technology progresses, the need for precise trajectory prediction models becomes paramount. This paper introduces an innovative model that infuses cognitive insights into trajectory prediction, focusing on perceived safety and dynamic decision-making. Distinct from traditional approaches, our model excels in analyzing interactions and behavior patterns in mixed autonomy traffic scenarios. It represents a significant leap forward, achieving marked performance improvements on several key datasets. Specifically, it surpasses existing benchmarks with gains of 16.2% on the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM), 27.4% on the Highway Drone (HighD), and 19.8% on the Macao Connected Autonomous Driving (MoCAD) dataset. Our proposed model shows exceptional proficiency in handling corner cases, essential for real-world applications. Moreover, its robustness is evident in scenarios with missing or limited data, outperforming most of the state-of-the-art baselines. This adaptability and resilience position our model as a viable tool for real-world autonomous driving systems, heralding a new standard in vehicle trajectory prediction for enhanced safety and efficiency.
4/29/2024
🔮
Evaluating Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction Methods with Respect to Autonomous Driving
Nico Uhlemann, Felix Fent, Markus Lienkamp
0
0
In this paper, we assess the state of the art in pedestrian trajectory prediction within the context of generating single trajectories, a critical aspect aligning with the requirements in autonomous systems. The evaluation is conducted on the widely-used ETH/UCY dataset where the Average Displacement Error (ADE) and the Final Displacement Error (FDE) are reported. Alongside this, we perform an ablation study to investigate the impact of the observed motion history on prediction performance. To evaluate the scalability of each approach when confronted with varying amounts of agents, the inference time of each model is measured. Following a quantitative analysis, the resulting predictions are compared in a qualitative manner, giving insight into the strengths and weaknesses of current approaches. The results demonstrate that although a constant velocity model (CVM) provides a good approximation of the overall dynamics in the majority of cases, additional features need to be incorporated to reflect common pedestrian behavior observed. Therefore, this study presents a data-driven analysis with the intent to guide the future development of pedestrian trajectory prediction algorithms.
4/8/2024
🔮
Conformal Prediction of Motion Control Performance for an Automated Vehicle in Presence of Actuator Degradations and Failures
Richard Schubert, Marvin Loba, Jasper Sunnemann, Torben Stolte, Markus Maurer
0
0
Automated driving systems require monitoring mechanisms to ensure safe operation, especially if system components degrade or fail. Their runtime self-representation plays a key role as it provides a-priori knowledge about the system's capabilities and limitations. In this paper, we propose a data-driven approach for deriving such a self-representation model for the motion controller of an automated vehicle. A conformalized prediction model is learned and allows estimating how operational conditions as well as potential degradations and failures of the vehicle's actuators impact motion control performance. During runtime behavior generation, our predictor can provide a heuristic for determining the admissible action space.
4/26/2024