SYNTHEVAL: Hybrid Behavioral Testing of NLP Models with Synthetic CheckLists

Read original: arXiv:2408.17437 - Published 9/2/2024 by Raoyuan Zhao, Abdullatif Koksal, Yihong Liu, Leonie Weissweiler, Anna Korhonen, Hinrich Schutze

🧪

Overview

Traditional NLP model evaluation relies on static test sets, which can overestimate performance and lack comprehensive assessment.
Recent works like DynaBench and CheckList have addressed these limitations through behavioral testing with human-annotated test types.
Manually creating diverse test types is labor-intensive and costly.
This paper introduces SYNTHEVAL, a framework that generates a wide range of test types using large language models (LLMs) for comprehensive NLP model evaluation.

Plain English Explanation

The typical way to evaluate how well natural language processing (NLP) models perform is by using a fixed set of test data that the models haven't seen before. However, this approach can make the models look better than they actually are, and it doesn't give a complete picture of how the models would perform in the real world.

To address these issues, some researchers have developed new methods that test the models' behavior in more depth. For example, DynaBench and CheckList create different types of test cases by having people manually design them. This provides a more thorough assessment of the models' capabilities.

The problem is that manually creating all these test cases requires a lot of human effort, which can be very expensive. In this paper, the researchers propose a new approach called SYNTHEVAL that uses powerful language models to automatically generate a wide variety of test cases. This allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of NLP models without as much manual work.

Technical Explanation

The key idea behind SYNTHEVAL is to leverage large language models (LLMs) to generate diverse test examples for evaluating NLP models. The process has three main steps:

Controlled Generation: SYNTHEVAL uses LLMs to generate sentences that cover a range of linguistic phenomena, such as negation, paraphrasing, and semantic similarity.
Identification of Challenging Examples: SYNTHEVAL compares the predictions made by the target NLP model and the LLMs on the generated sentences. Sentences where the models disagree are identified as potentially challenging examples.
Manual Template Design: Human experts then investigate the challenging examples and design templates to capture the types of errors the NLP model consistently makes.

The researchers apply SYNTHEVAL to two tasks: sentiment analysis and toxic language detection. They show that SYNTHEVAL is effective at identifying weaknesses in strong NLP models on these tasks, providing a more comprehensive evaluation than traditional static test sets.

Critical Analysis

The SYNTHEVAL framework addresses important limitations of traditional NLP model evaluation by generating diverse test cases automatically. This helps uncover model weaknesses that may be missed by static test sets.

However, the approach still requires manual effort in the final step of designing test templates. While this is less labor-intensive than creating the entire test suite from scratch, it could still be a bottleneck, especially for more complex NLP tasks.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the types of errors or linguistic phenomena that SYNTHEVAL was able to identify. Further research could explore how the framework performs across a wider range of NLP tasks and model architectures.

It would also be valuable to investigate how the automatically generated test cases compare to human-curated ones in terms of their ability to reveal model weaknesses and generalize to real-world scenarios.

Conclusion

The SYNTHEVAL framework introduces a promising approach to NLP model evaluation that leverages the power of large language models to generate diverse test cases. By combining automated generation with targeted human expertise, the framework can provide a more comprehensive and interpretable assessment of model performance.

This work highlights the importance of going beyond traditional static test sets to uncover the true capabilities and limitations of NLP models. As the field of natural language processing continues to advance, innovative evaluation approaches like SYNTHEVAL will be crucial for driving progress and ensuring the reliability of these increasingly influential systems.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧪

SYNTHEVAL: Hybrid Behavioral Testing of NLP Models with Synthetic CheckLists

Raoyuan Zhao, Abdullatif Koksal, Yihong Liu, Leonie Weissweiler, Anna Korhonen, Hinrich Schutze

Traditional benchmarking in NLP typically involves using static held-out test sets. However, this approach often results in an overestimation of performance and lacks the ability to offer comprehensive, interpretable, and dynamic assessments of NLP models. Recently, works like DynaBench (Kiela et al., 2021) and CheckList (Ribeiro et al., 2020) have addressed these limitations through behavioral testing of NLP models with test types generated by a multistep human-annotated pipeline. Unfortunately, manually creating a variety of test types requires much human labor, often at prohibitive cost. In this work, we propose SYNTHEVAL, a hybrid behavioral testing framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate a wide range of test types for a comprehensive evaluation of NLP models. SYNTHEVAL first generates sentences via LLMs using controlled generation, and then identifies challenging examples by comparing the predictions made by LLMs with task-specific NLP models. In the last stage, human experts investigate the challenging examples, manually design templates, and identify the types of failures the taskspecific models consistently exhibit. We apply SYNTHEVAL to two classification tasks, sentiment analysis and toxic language detection, and show that our framework is effective in identifying weaknesses of strong models on these tasks. We share our code in https://github.com/Loreley99/SynthEval_CheckList.

9/2/2024

A Multi-Faceted Evaluation Framework for Assessing Synthetic Data Generated by Large Language Models

Yefeng Yuan, Yuhong Liu, Liang Cheng

The rapid advancements in generative AI and large language models (LLMs) have opened up new avenues for producing synthetic data, particularly in the realm of structured tabular formats, such as product reviews. Despite the potential benefits, concerns regarding privacy leakage have surfaced, especially when personal information is utilized in the training datasets. In addition, there is an absence of a comprehensive evaluation framework capable of quantitatively measuring the quality of the generated synthetic data and their utility for downstream tasks. In response to this gap, we introduce SynEval, an open-source evaluation framework designed to assess the fidelity, utility, and privacy preservation of synthetically generated tabular data via a suite of diverse evaluation metrics. We validate the efficacy of our proposed framework - SynEval - by applying it to synthetic product review data generated by three state-of-the-art LLMs: ChatGPT, Claude, and Llama. Our experimental findings illuminate the trade-offs between various evaluation metrics in the context of synthetic data generation. Furthermore, SynEval stands as a critical instrument for researchers and practitioners engaged with synthetic tabular data,, empowering them to judiciously determine the suitability of the generated data for their specific applications, with an emphasis on upholding user privacy.

4/24/2024

Check-Eval: A Checklist-based Approach for Evaluating Text Quality

Jayr Pereira, Andre Assumpcao, Roberto Lotufo

Evaluating the quality of text generated by large language models (LLMs) remains a significant challenge. Traditional metrics often fail to align well with human judgments, particularly in tasks requiring creativity and nuance. In this paper, we propose textsc{Check-Eval}, a novel evaluation framework leveraging LLMs to assess the quality of generated text through a checklist-based approach. textsc{Check-Eval} can be employed as both a reference-free and reference-dependent evaluation method, providing a structured and interpretable assessment of text quality. The framework consists of two main stages: checklist generation and checklist evaluation. We validate textsc{Check-Eval} on two benchmark datasets: Portuguese Legal Semantic Textual Similarity and textsc{SummEval}. Our results demonstrate that textsc{Check-Eval} achieves higher correlations with human judgments compared to existing metrics, such as textsc{G-Eval} and textsc{GPTScore}, underscoring its potential as a more reliable and effective evaluation framework for natural language generation tasks. The code for our experiments is available at url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/check-eval-0DB4}

9/11/2024

💬

S3Eval: A Synthetic, Scalable, Systematic Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models

Fangyu Lei, Qian Liu, Yiming Huang, Shizhu He, Jun Zhao, Kang Liu

The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to great strides in model capabilities like long-context understanding and reasoning. However, as LLMs are able to process longer contexts, it becomes more challenging to evaluate whether they have acquired certain capabilities, since the length of text (e.g., 200K tokens) they can process far exceeds what humans can reliably assess in a reasonable duration. In this paper, we propose using complex synthetic tasks as a proxy evaluation method, and present S3Eval, a Synthetic, Scalable, Systematic evaluation suite for LLMs evaluation. The synthetic nature of S3Eval provides users full control over the dataset, allowing them to systematically probe LLM capabilities by scaling text length and varying task difficulty across diverse scenarios. The strong correlation between S3Eval and real-world benchmarks demonstrates the soundness of using S3Eval for evaluation of LLMs. S3Eval provides a flexible and infinite long-context data generation method. We have generated a comprehensive dataset called S3Eval-Standard, and experimental results have shown that it poses significant challenges for all existing LLMs.

4/9/2024