A Multi-Faceted Evaluation Framework for Assessing Synthetic Data Generated by Large Language Models
2404.14445
0
0
Abstract
The rapid advancements in generative AI and large language models (LLMs) have opened up new avenues for producing synthetic data, particularly in the realm of structured tabular formats, such as product reviews. Despite the potential benefits, concerns regarding privacy leakage have surfaced, especially when personal information is utilized in the training datasets. In addition, there is an absence of a comprehensive evaluation framework capable of quantitatively measuring the quality of the generated synthetic data and their utility for downstream tasks. In response to this gap, we introduce SynEval, an open-source evaluation framework designed to assess the fidelity, utility, and privacy preservation of synthetically generated tabular data via a suite of diverse evaluation metrics. We validate the efficacy of our proposed framework - SynEval - by applying it to synthetic product review data generated by three state-of-the-art LLMs: ChatGPT, Claude, and Llama. Our experimental findings illuminate the trade-offs between various evaluation metrics in the context of synthetic data generation. Furthermore, SynEval stands as a critical instrument for researchers and practitioners engaged with synthetic tabular data,, empowering them to judiciously determine the suitability of the generated data for their specific applications, with an emphasis on upholding user privacy.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing the quality and diversity of synthetic data generated by large language models.
- The framework covers multiple facets of synthetic data, including realism, diversity, and utility, to provide a more holistic evaluation.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their framework through experiments on various synthetic data generation models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on evaluating the quality of synthetic data generated by large language models. These models can create new, artificial data that resembles real-world data. This can be useful for training machine learning models when real data is scarce or sensitive.
However, it's important to ensure the synthetic data is high-quality and accurately reflects the characteristics of the real data. The authors of this paper developed a comprehensive framework to assess different aspects of the synthetic data, such as how realistic it looks, how diverse it is, and how useful it is for training other models.
By evaluating the synthetic data across these multiple facets, the framework provides a more thorough and trustworthy way to assess these generation models. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments on various synthetic data generation models.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a multi-faceted evaluation framework for assessing the quality and diversity of synthetic data generated by large language models. The framework covers three key aspects:
- Realism: Evaluating how closely the synthetic data resembles the real-world data distribution.
- Diversity: Measuring the variety and uniqueness of the generated samples.
- Utility: Assessing the usefulness of the synthetic data for training other machine learning models.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their framework through experiments on several synthetic data generation models, including VAE-GAN, CTGAN, and SDGYM. They evaluate the models' performance across the three facets using a range of metrics, such as FID, [KL-divergence], and [accuracy on downstream tasks].
The key insights from the experiments include the trade-offs between realism and diversity, the impact of model architecture and training on the synthetic data quality, and the importance of a comprehensive evaluation approach to gain a holistic understanding of the generation models' capabilities.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research in their work. For example, they note that their framework primarily focuses on tabular data, and more research is needed to extend it to other data modalities, such as images and text.
Additionally, the authors highlight the challenges in defining and measuring certain evaluation criteria, such as the "utility" of synthetic data, which can be subjective and task-dependent. Further research is needed to develop more robust and generalizable utility metrics.
Another potential area of concern is the computational overhead and scalability of the proposed evaluation framework, especially when dealing with large-scale synthetic data generation models. The authors mention plans to address this in future work, but it remains a practical consideration for real-world deployment.
Overall, the authors have made a valuable contribution to the field of synthetic data generation by proposing a comprehensive and principled evaluation framework. However, as with any research, there are opportunities for further refinement and expansion to address the identified limitations and ensure the framework remains relevant and applicable as the field continues to evolve.
Conclusion
This paper presents a multi-faceted evaluation framework for assessing the quality and diversity of synthetic data generated by large language models. By considering realism, diversity, and utility, the framework provides a more holistic approach to evaluating these generation models.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their framework through experiments on various synthetic data generation models, revealing key insights about the trade-offs between different evaluation criteria and the impact of model design choices.
The proposed framework represents a significant step forward in the field of synthetic data generation, as it offers a more rigorous and comprehensive way to evaluate the capabilities of these models. As the technology continues to evolve, this work lays the foundation for further research and development to ensure the reliable and trustworthy deployment of synthetic data in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
An evaluation framework for synthetic data generation models
Ioannis E. Livieris, Nikos Alimpertis, George Domalis, Dimitris Tsakalidis
0
0
Nowadays, the use of synthetic data has gained popularity as a cost-efficient strategy for enhancing data augmentation for improving machine learning models performance as well as addressing concerns related to sensitive data privacy. Therefore, the necessity of ensuring quality of generated synthetic data, in terms of accurate representation of real data, consists of primary importance. In this work, we present a new framework for evaluating synthetic data generation models' ability for developing high-quality synthetic data. The proposed approach is able to provide strong statistical and theoretical information about the evaluation framework and the compared models' ranking. Two use case scenarios demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework for evaluating the ability of synthetic data generation models to generated high quality data. The implementation code can be found in https://github.com/novelcore/synthetic_data_evaluation_framework.
4/16/2024
Structured Evaluation of Synthetic Tabular Data
Scott Cheng-Hsin Yang, Baxter Eaves, Michael Schmidt, Ken Swanson, Patrick Shafto
0
0
Tabular data is common yet typically incomplete, small in volume, and access-restricted due to privacy concerns. Synthetic data generation offers potential solutions. Many metrics exist for evaluating the quality of synthetic tabular data; however, we lack an objective, coherent interpretation of the many metrics. To address this issue, we propose an evaluation framework with a single, mathematical objective that posits that the synthetic data should be drawn from the same distribution as the observed data. Through various structural decomposition of the objective, this framework allows us to reason for the first time the completeness of any set of metrics, as well as unifies existing metrics, including those that stem from fidelity considerations, downstream application, and model-based approaches. Moreover, the framework motivates model-free baselines and a new spectrum of metrics. We evaluate structurally informed synthesizers and synthesizers powered by deep learning. Using our structured framework, we show that synthetic data generators that explicitly represent tabular structure outperform other methods, especially on smaller datasets.
4/1/2024
Systematic Assessment of Tabular Data Synthesis Algorithms
Yuntao Du, Ninghui Li
0
0
Data synthesis has been advocated as an important approach for utilizing data while protecting data privacy. A large number of tabular data synthesis algorithms (which we call synthesizers) have been proposed. Some synthesizers satisfy Differential Privacy, while others aim to provide privacy in a heuristic fashion. A comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of these synthesizers remains elusive due to drawbacks in evaluation metrics and missing head-to-head comparisons of newly developed synthesizers that take advantage of diffusion models and large language models with state-of-the-art marginal-based synthesizers. In this paper, we present a systematic evaluation framework for assessing tabular data synthesis algorithms. Specifically, we examine and critique existing evaluation metrics, and introduce a set of new metrics in terms of fidelity, privacy, and utility to address their limitations. Based on the proposed metrics, we also devise a unified objective for tuning, which can consistently improve the quality of synthetic data for all methods. We conducted extensive evaluations of 8 different types of synthesizers on 12 real-world datasets and identified some interesting findings, which offer new directions for privacy-preserving data synthesis.
4/16/2024
💬
S3Eval: A Synthetic, Scalable, Systematic Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models
Fangyu Lei, Qian Liu, Yiming Huang, Shizhu He, Jun Zhao, Kang Liu
0
0
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to great strides in model capabilities like long-context understanding and reasoning. However, as LLMs are able to process longer contexts, it becomes more challenging to evaluate whether they have acquired certain capabilities, since the length of text (e.g., 200K tokens) they can process far exceeds what humans can reliably assess in a reasonable duration. In this paper, we propose using complex synthetic tasks as a proxy evaluation method, and present S3Eval, a Synthetic, Scalable, Systematic evaluation suite for LLMs evaluation. The synthetic nature of S3Eval provides users full control over the dataset, allowing them to systematically probe LLM capabilities by scaling text length and varying task difficulty across diverse scenarios. The strong correlation between S3Eval and real-world benchmarks demonstrates the soundness of using S3Eval for evaluation of LLMs. S3Eval provides a flexible and infinite long-context data generation method. We have generated a comprehensive dataset called S3Eval-Standard, and experimental results have shown that it poses significant challenges for all existing LLMs.
4/9/2024