A System for Quantifying Data Science Workflows with Fine-Grained Procedural Logging and a Pilot Study
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a system for quantifying data science workflows using fine-grained procedural logging.
- The authors conduct a pilot study to demonstrate the capabilities of their system and provide insights into the data science process.
- The goal is to better understand the complex workflows involved in data science tasks, which can inform the development of tools and practices to support data scientists.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new system that tracks and analyzes the step-by-step process data scientists use to complete their work. By closely monitoring the actions taken during a data science project, the researchers aim to gain a detailed understanding of how this type of work is actually carried out in practice.
The core idea is that by capturing a large amount of granular data about the workflow, the researchers can uncover patterns, inefficiencies, and insights that would be difficult to observe through other means. This information could then be used to improve the tools and environments that data scientists rely on, making them more productive and efficient.
As an example, the system might track every time a data scientist switches between different software applications, how long they spend reading documentation, or the types of exploratory data analysis they perform. By analyzing this detailed log of activities, the researchers hope to identify common pain points or bottlenecks in the data science process that could be addressed.
Technical Explanation
The key components of the system described in the paper are:
-
Procedural Logging: The system uses a fine-grained logging approach to capture a detailed record of the actions taken by data scientists as they work. This includes tracking things like code execution, file operations, application usage, and more.
-
Workflow Analysis: The logged data is then analyzed to identify patterns, trends, and insights about the overall data science workflow. This could involve techniques like process mining or sequence analysis.
-
Pilot Study: The authors conduct a small-scale pilot study to demonstrate the capabilities of their system and provide an initial set of findings about the data science process. This includes visualizations and quantitative metrics derived from the logged data.
The core innovation of this work is the fine-grained, comprehensive approach to capturing data science workflows. By collecting a detailed trace of all user actions, the researchers are able to gain a richer, more holistic understanding of the data science process compared to more traditional methods.
Critical Analysis
The pilot study presented in the paper provides an encouraging proof-of-concept for the authors' workflow quantification system. However, the small sample size and limited scope of the study mean the findings should be interpreted cautiously. Larger-scale trials with more diverse participants would be needed to validate the generalizability of the insights.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential privacy or ethical concerns around the extensive data collection involved. As the system tracks granular user activities, there are important considerations around informed consent, data security, and potential misuse of the captured information.
Further research is also needed to explore how the workflow insights generated by this system could be effectively translated into actionable improvements for data science tools and practices. The connection to real-world impact is not yet clearly demonstrated.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for quantifying the complex workflows involved in data science work. By capturing a fine-grained, comprehensive record of user activities, the system aims to provide unprecedented visibility into the data science process.
The pilot study results offer an initial set of insights, but also highlight the need for further research to validate the findings and explore the practical applications. Addressing ethical concerns and scaling up the analysis to larger, more diverse samples will be important next steps.
Overall, this work represents an interesting step towards better understanding and supporting the work of data scientists, which could have significant implications for the field and the broader impact of data-driven research and decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A System for Quantifying Data Science Workflows with Fine-Grained Procedural Logging and a Pilot Study
Jinjin Zhao, Avidgor Gal, Sanjay Krishnan
It is important for researchers to understand precisely how data scientists turn raw data into insights, including typical programming patterns, workflow, and methodology. This paper contributes a novel system, called DataInquirer, that tracks incremental code executions in Jupyter notebooks (a type of computational notebook). The system allows us to quantitatively measure timing, workflow, and operation frequency in data science tasks without resorting to human annotation or interview. In a series of pilot studies, we collect 97 traces, logging data scientist activities across four studies. While this paper presents a general system and data analysis approach, we focus on a foundational sub-question in our pilot studies: How consistent are different data scientists in analyzing the same data? We taxonomize variation between data scientists on the same dataset according to three categories: semantic, syntactic, and methodological. Our results suggest that there are statistically significant differences in the conclusions reached by different data scientists on the same task and present quantitative evidence for this phenomenon. Furthermore, our results suggest that AI-powered code tools subtly influence these results, allowing student participants to generate workflows that more resemble expert data practitioners.
Read more5/29/2024
0
Data Makes Better Data Scientists
Jinjin Zhao, Avidgor Gal, Sanjay Krishnan
With the goal of identifying common practices in data science projects, this paper proposes a framework for logging and understanding incremental code executions in Jupyter notebooks. This framework aims to allow reasoning about how insights are generated in data science and extract key observations into best data science practices in the wild. In this paper, we show an early prototype of this framework and ran an experiment to log a machine learning project for 25 undergraduate students.
Read more5/29/2024
0
Flow-Bench: A Dataset for Computational Workflow Anomaly Detection
George Papadimitriou, Hongwei Jin, Cong Wang, Rajiv Mayani, Krishnan Raghavan, Anirban Mandal, Prasanna Balaprakash, Ewa Deelman
A computational workflow, also known as workflow, consists of tasks that must be executed in a specific order to attain a specific goal. Often, in fields such as biology, chemistry, physics, and data science, among others, these workflows are complex and are executed in large-scale, distributed, and heterogeneous computing environments prone to failures and performance degradation. Therefore, anomaly detection for workflows is an important paradigm that aims to identify unexpected behavior or errors in workflow execution. This crucial task to improve the reliability of workflow executions can be further assisted by machine learning-based techniques. However, such application is limited, in large part, due to the lack of open datasets and benchmarking. To address this gap, we make the following contributions in this paper: (1) we systematically inject anomalies and collect raw execution logs from workflows executing on distributed infrastructures; (2) we summarize the statistics of new datasets, and provide insightful analyses; (3) we convert workflows into tabular, graph and text data, and benchmark with supervised and unsupervised anomaly detection techniques correspondingly. The presented dataset and benchmarks allow examining the effectiveness and efficiency of scientific computational workflows and identifying potential research opportunities for improvement and generalization. The dataset and benchmark code are publicly available url{https://poseidon-workflows.github.io/FlowBench/} under the MIT License.
Read more6/14/2024
0
Facilitating Mixed-Methods Analysis with Computational Notebooks
Jiawen Stefanie Zhu, Zibo Zhang, Jian Zhao
Data exploration is an important aspect of the workflow of mixed-methods researchers, who conduct both qualitative and quantitative analysis. However, there currently exists few tools that adequately support both types of analysis simultaneously, forcing researchers to context-switch between different tools and increasing their mental burden when integrating the results. To address this gap, we propose a unified environment that facilitates mixed-methods analysis in a computational notebook-based settings. We conduct a scenario study with three HCI mixed-methods researchers to gather feedback on our design concept and to understand our users' needs and requirements.
Read more5/31/2024