Systematic Review on Healthcare Systems Engineering utilizing ChatGPT

Read original: arXiv:2405.11817 - Published 5/21/2024 by Jungwoo Kim, Ji-Su Lee, Huijae Kim, Taesik Lee
Total Score

0

🖼️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art language model, to conduct academic reviews in the field of Healthcare Systems Engineering.
  • The authors used 9,809 abstract paragraphs from conference presentations to systematically review the field.
  • The framework developed in this paper includes distinct analytical processes, each employing tailored prompts and the systematic use of the ChatGPT API.
  • The research organizes the target field into 11 topic categories and provides a comprehensive analysis covering quantitative yearly trends and detailed sub-categories.
  • The goal is to explore the potential for leveraging ChatGPT to alleviate the burden of academic reviews and provide valuable insights into the dynamic landscape of Healthcare Systems Engineering research.

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers investigated how the advanced language model ChatGPT could be used to analyze and summarize research in the field of Healthcare Systems Engineering. They collected 9,809 abstracts from conference presentations and developed a framework that employs tailored prompts and the ChatGPT API to systematically review the field.

Through this framework, the researchers were able to organize the Healthcare Systems Engineering field into 11 key topics and analyze trends over time, as well as dive deeper into specific sub-topics. The goal was to explore whether ChatGPT could be used to streamline the process of conducting academic reviews, which can be time-consuming and labor-intensive. The researchers also wanted to gain a better understanding of the current state of research in this important field.

By leveraging the powerful language capabilities of ChatGPT, the researchers were able to efficiently summarize and synthesize a large amount of research, potentially alleviating the burden on human researchers. The insights gained from this analysis could also help guide future research directions and collaborations in Healthcare Systems Engineering.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed a framework that utilized the ChatGPT API to systematically review the field of Healthcare Systems Engineering. They collected 9,809 abstract paragraphs from conference presentations and designed a series of tailored prompts to engage the ChatGPT model in different analytical tasks.

The framework consisted of distinct processes, such as organizing the field into 11 topic categories and conducting both quantitative and qualitative analyses. The quantitative analysis tracked yearly trends in the research, while the qualitative analysis delved into the specific sub-topics within each category.

By automating these review processes with ChatGPT, the researchers aimed to explore the potential for language models to alleviate the burden of manual academic reviews. The framework's ability to efficiently summarize and synthesize a large volume of research could lead to valuable insights that guide future work in Healthcare Systems Engineering.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that while their framework leverages the impressive language capabilities of ChatGPT, there are still limitations and potential concerns to consider. For example, the accuracy and reliability of the ChatGPT-generated summaries and analyses may be subject to the model's biases and training data, which could introduce systematic errors or misrepresentations.

Additionally, the researchers note that the framework is dependent on the specific prompts and analytical processes they designed. Variations in prompt engineering or the selection of target field may yield different results, and the framework's generalizability to other academic domains remains to be explored.

Further research could investigate ways to incorporate human validation and oversight to ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of the ChatGPT-powered analysis. Exploring the potential for interactive and iterative prompting could also enhance the framework's capabilities and user experience.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework that leverages the language processing capabilities of ChatGPT to conduct academic reviews in the field of Healthcare Systems Engineering. By automating the review process, the researchers aimed to alleviate the burden on human researchers and provide valuable insights into the dynamic landscape of this important field.

The framework's ability to organize the field, track trends, and explore sub-topics demonstrates the potential for language models to enhance and streamline academic research processes. However, the researchers acknowledge the need for further exploration to address the limitations and ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of the ChatGPT-powered analysis.

As the field of Healthcare Systems Engineering continues to evolve, this research highlights the promising role that advanced language models can play in supporting and accelerating academic discovery and knowledge synthesis.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🖼️

Total Score

0

Systematic Review on Healthcare Systems Engineering utilizing ChatGPT

Jungwoo Kim, Ji-Su Lee, Huijae Kim, Taesik Lee

This paper presents an analytical framework for conducting academic reviews in the field of Healthcare Systems Engineering, employing ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art tool among recent language models. We utilized 9,809 abstract paragraphs from conference presentations to systematically review the field. The framework comprises distinct analytical processes, each employing tailored prompts and the systematic use of the ChatGPT API. Through this framework, we organized the target field into 11 topic categories and conducted a comprehensive analysis covering quantitative yearly trends and detailed sub-categories. This effort explores the potential for leveraging ChatGPT to alleviate the burden of academic reviews. Furthermore, it provides valuable insights into the dynamic landscape of Healthcare Systems Engineering research.

Read more

5/21/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

Evaluating the Application of ChatGPT in Outpatient Triage Guidance: A Comparative Study

Dou Liu, Ying Han, Xiandi Wang, Xiaomei Tan, Di Liu, Guangwu Qian, Kang Li, Dan Pu, Rong Yin

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare presents a transformative potential for enhancing operational efficiency and health outcomes. Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, have shown their capabilities in supporting medical decision-making. Embedding LLMs in medical systems is becoming a promising trend in healthcare development. The potential of ChatGPT to address the triage problem in emergency departments has been examined, while few studies have explored its application in outpatient departments. With a focus on streamlining workflows and enhancing efficiency for outpatient triage, this study specifically aims to evaluate the consistency of responses provided by ChatGPT in outpatient guidance, including both within-version response analysis and between-version comparisons. For within-version, the results indicate that the internal response consistency for ChatGPT-4.0 is significantly higher than ChatGPT-3.5 (p=0.03) and both have a moderate consistency (71.2% for 4.0 and 59.6% for 3.5) in their top recommendation. However, the between-version consistency is relatively low (mean consistency score=1.43/3, median=1), indicating few recommendations match between the two versions. Also, only 50% top recommendations match perfectly in the comparisons. Interestingly, ChatGPT-3.5 responses are more likely to be complete than those from ChatGPT-4.0 (p=0.02), suggesting possible differences in information processing and response generation between the two versions. The findings offer insights into AI-assisted outpatient operations, while also facilitating the exploration of potentials and limitations of LLMs in healthcare utilization. Future research may focus on carefully optimizing LLMs and AI integration in healthcare systems based on ergonomic and human factors principles, precisely aligning with the specific needs of effective outpatient triage.

Read more

5/3/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

The AI Companion in Education: Analyzing the Pedagogical Potential of ChatGPT in Computer Science and Engineering

Zhangying He, Thomas Nguyen, Tahereh Miari, Mehrdad Aliasgari, Setareh Rafatirad, Hossein Sayadi

Artificial Intelligence (AI), with ChatGPT as a prominent example, has recently taken center stage in various domains including higher education, particularly in Computer Science and Engineering (CSE). The AI revolution brings both convenience and controversy, offering substantial benefits while lacking formal guidance on their application. The primary objective of this work is to comprehensively analyze the pedagogical potential of ChatGPT in CSE education, understanding its strengths and limitations from the perspectives of educators and learners. We employ a systematic approach, creating a diverse range of educational practice problems within CSE field, focusing on various subjects such as data science, programming, AI, machine learning, networks, and more. According to our examinations, certain question types, like conceptual knowledge queries, typically do not pose significant challenges to ChatGPT, and thus, are excluded from our analysis. Alternatively, we focus our efforts on developing more in-depth and personalized questions and project-based tasks. These questions are presented to ChatGPT, followed by interactions to assess its effectiveness in delivering complete and meaningful responses. To this end, we propose a comprehensive five-factor reliability analysis framework to evaluate the responses. This assessment aims to identify when ChatGPT excels and when it faces challenges. Our study concludes with a correlation analysis, delving into the relationships among subjects, task types, and limiting factors. This analysis offers valuable insights to enhance ChatGPT's utility in CSE education, providing guidance to educators and students regarding its reliability and efficacy.

Read more

7/9/2024

💬

Total Score

0

ChatGPT as an inventor: Eliciting the strengths and weaknesses of current large language models against humans in engineering design

Daniel Nyg{aa}rd Ege, Henrik H. {O}vreb{o}, Vegar Stubberud, Martin Francis Berg, Christer Elverum, Martin Steinert, H{aa}vard Vestad

This study compares the design practices and performance of ChatGPT 4.0, a large language model (LLM), against graduate engineering students in a 48-hour prototyping hackathon, based on a dataset comprising more than 100 prototypes. The LLM participated by instructing two participants who executed its instructions and provided objective feedback, generated ideas autonomously and made all design decisions without human intervention. The LLM exhibited similar prototyping practices to human participants and finished second among six teams, successfully designing and providing building instructions for functional prototypes. The LLM's concept generation capabilities were particularly strong. However, the LLM prematurely abandoned promising concepts when facing minor difficulties, added unnecessary complexity to designs, and experienced design fixation. Communication between the LLM and participants was challenging due to vague or unclear descriptions, and the LLM had difficulty maintaining continuity and relevance in answers. Based on these findings, six recommendations for implementing an LLM like ChatGPT in the design process are proposed, including leveraging it for ideation, ensuring human oversight for key decisions, implementing iterative feedback loops, prompting it to consider alternatives, and assigning specific and manageable tasks at a subsystem level.

Read more

4/30/2024