Evaluating the Application of ChatGPT in Outpatient Triage Guidance: A Comparative Study

Overview

• This study investigates the potential of using the Large Language Model (LLM) ChatGPT to support outpatient triage in healthcare settings.
• The researchers evaluate the consistency of responses provided by different versions of ChatGPT (3.5 and 4.0) when answering questions related to outpatient guidance.
• The study aims to provide insights into the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in healthcare operations, particularly in streamlining workflows and enhancing efficiency for outpatient triage.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores how artificial intelligence (AI) models like ChatGPT can be used to assist with patient triage in outpatient healthcare settings. Triage is the process of prioritizing patients based on the severity of their condition, which is critical for managing patient flow and ensuring efficient use of healthcare resources.

The researchers compared the responses of two versions of ChatGPT (3.5 and 4.0) to see how consistent they were when providing guidance on outpatient care. They found that the newer version, ChatGPT-4.0, had significantly higher internal consistency in its recommendations compared to the older version, ChatGPT-3.5. However, the consistency between the two versions was relatively low, meaning that the recommendations often differed between the two.

Interestingly, the researchers also found that ChatGPT-3.5 was more likely to provide complete responses than ChatGPT-4.0, suggesting that the newer version may have differences in how it processes information and generates responses.

The findings of this study offer insights into how AI-powered systems can be integrated into healthcare workflows to streamline operations and improve patient care. However, the researchers also highlight the need for careful optimization of these systems to ensure they align with the specific needs of effective outpatient triage.

Technical Explanation

The study aimed to evaluate the consistency of responses provided by two versions of the Large Language Model (LLM) ChatGPT in the context of outpatient guidance. The researchers compared the within-version response consistency of ChatGPT-4.0 and ChatGPT-3.5, as well as the between-version consistency of their recommendations.

For the within-version analysis, the results showed that ChatGPT-4.0 had significantly higher internal response consistency (71.2%) compared to ChatGPT-3.5 (59.6%), indicating that the newer version provided more consistent top recommendations. However, the between-version consistency was relatively low, with a mean consistency score of 1.43 out of 3 and a median of 1, suggesting that the recommendations often differed between the two versions.

Interestingly, the researchers also found that ChatGPT-3.5 responses were more likely to be complete compared to ChatGPT-4.0 (p=0.02). This suggests potential differences in information processing and response generation between the two versions of the LLM.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into the potential and limitations of using Large Language Models, such as ChatGPT, in healthcare operations, particularly for outpatient triage. The findings highlight the importance of carefully optimizing these systems to align with the specific needs and workflows of healthcare settings.

While the study demonstrates the consistency of responses within individual ChatGPT versions, the relatively low between-version consistency raises questions about the reliability and predictability of these systems across different versions. This could be a concern for healthcare providers who may need to rely on consistent recommendations to make informed decisions.

Additionally, the differences in response completeness between the two versions suggest that further research is needed to understand the impact of model updates and refinements on the quality and usability of the generated outputs. Factors such as user trust, transparency, and the integration of these systems into existing healthcare workflows should also be carefully considered.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the potential of using Large Language Models, such as ChatGPT, to support outpatient triage in healthcare settings. The findings highlight the need for careful optimization of these systems to ensure they align with the specific needs and workflows of healthcare operations.

While the study demonstrates the potential of LLMs in enhancing efficiency and streamlining workflows, it also raises important questions about the reliability and consistency of these systems across different versions. Further research is needed to address these challenges and explore ways to seamlessly integrate AI-powered tools into the healthcare ecosystem.