Teach Harder, Learn Poorer: Rethinking Hard Sample Distillation for GNN-to-MLP Knowledge Distillation

Read original: arXiv:2407.14768 - Published 7/23/2024 by Lirong Wu, Yunfan Liu, Haitao Lin, Yufei Huang, Stan Z. Li
Total Score

0

Teach Harder, Learn Poorer: Rethinking Hard Sample Distillation for GNN-to-MLP Knowledge Distillation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper "Teach Harder, Learn Poorer: Rethinking Hard Sample Distillation for GNN-to-MLP Knowledge Distillation" explores how to effectively transfer knowledge from a powerful Graph Neural Network (GNN) model to a simpler Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) model.
  • The key idea is to reconsider the common practice of focusing on "hard" samples during knowledge distillation, which can lead to the MLP model learning poorly on "easy" samples.
  • The paper proposes an alternative approach that balances the learning of hard and easy samples, leading to better overall performance of the distilled MLP model.

Plain English Explanation

In machine learning, there is often a tradeoff between model complexity and performance. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are powerful models that can achieve high accuracy, but they can be computationally intensive and difficult to deploy on resource-constrained devices. Knowledge distillation is a technique that aims to transfer the knowledge from a complex "teacher" model (like a GNN) to a simpler "student" model (like an MLP), allowing the student to achieve similar performance to the teacher.

One common approach in knowledge distillation is to focus on the "hard" samples - the ones that the student model struggles with the most. The idea is that by prioritizing the learning of these difficult samples, the student model will become more robust and accurate. However, this paper argues that this approach can actually lead to the student model learning poorly on the "easy" samples, resulting in lower overall performance.

Instead, the authors propose a more balanced approach that considers both hard and easy samples during the distillation process. This helps the student model learn a more well-rounded understanding of the task, rather than becoming overly specialized on the difficult cases. By rethinking the way we approach hard sample distillation, the paper shows how we can improve the performance of distilled MLP models without sacrificing their simplicity and efficiency.

Technical Explanation

The paper starts by highlighting the importance of knowledge distillation for deploying powerful GNN models in resource-constrained environments. The authors note that a common strategy in knowledge distillation is to focus on "hard" samples - those that the student model struggles with the most.

However, the key insight of this paper is that this "hard sample distillation" approach can actually lead to the student model learning poorly on "easy" samples. The authors hypothesize that this is because the student model becomes overly specialized on the difficult cases, at the expense of learning a more general understanding of the task.

To address this issue, the authors propose an alternative approach called "Balanced Sample Distillation" (BSD). The core idea is to balance the learning of hard and easy samples during the distillation process, rather than prioritizing the hard samples. This is achieved by dynamically adjusting the loss weights for hard and easy samples based on the student model's performance.

The paper presents extensive experiments on graph classification and node classification tasks, comparing the proposed BSD approach to standard hard sample distillation as well as other knowledge distillation methods. The results show that BSD consistently outperforms the baselines, leading to better overall performance of the distilled MLP models.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for rethinking the common practice of hard sample distillation in the context of GNN-to-MLP knowledge transfer. The authors provide a clear theoretical motivation for their proposed Balanced Sample Distillation approach and back it up with thorough experimental validation.

One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses on relatively simple benchmark tasks, such as graph classification and node classification. It would be interesting to see how the proposed approach scales to more complex real-world applications, where the distribution of hard and easy samples may be more nuanced.

Additionally, the paper does not extensively explore the tradeoffs between the computational complexity of the distillation process and the final performance of the distilled MLP model. It would be valuable to understand the practical implications of the BSD approach in terms of training time, memory usage, and other resource constraints.

Overall, the paper presents a well-designed and thoughtful study that challenges a common assumption in knowledge distillation literature. The authors' insights and the proposed BSD method have the potential to improve the effectiveness of knowledge transfer from powerful GNN models to more efficient MLP models, with broad implications for deploying advanced AI systems in resource-constrained environments.

Conclusion

This paper offers a fresh perspective on the longstanding challenge of knowledge distillation, specifically in the context of transferring knowledge from Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to simpler Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) models. By rethinking the common practice of focusing on "hard" samples during distillation, the authors demonstrate how a more balanced approach can lead to improved overall performance of the distilled MLP model.

The key contribution of this work is the Balanced Sample Distillation (BSD) method, which dynamically adjusts the loss weights for hard and easy samples to ensure the student model learns a well-rounded understanding of the task. The extensive experiments conducted in the paper validate the effectiveness of this approach, paving the way for more efficient deployment of powerful GNN models in real-world applications.

Overall, this paper provides valuable insights that challenge existing assumptions in the field of knowledge distillation. By encouraging a more nuanced and balanced approach to sample selection, it has the potential to significantly improve the performance of distilled models and advance the state of the art in model compression and deployment.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Teach Harder, Learn Poorer: Rethinking Hard Sample Distillation for GNN-to-MLP Knowledge Distillation
Total Score

0

Teach Harder, Learn Poorer: Rethinking Hard Sample Distillation for GNN-to-MLP Knowledge Distillation

Lirong Wu, Yunfan Liu, Haitao Lin, Yufei Huang, Stan Z. Li

To bridge the gaps between powerful Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and lightweight Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLPs), GNN-to-MLP Knowledge Distillation (KD) proposes to distill knowledge from a well-trained teacher GNN into a student MLP. In this paper, we revisit the knowledge samples (nodes) in teacher GNNs from the perspective of hardness, and identify that hard sample distillation may be a major performance bottleneck of existing graph KD algorithms. The GNN-to-MLP KD involves two different types of hardness, one student-free knowledge hardness describing the inherent complexity of GNN knowledge, and the other student-dependent distillation hardness describing the difficulty of teacher-to-student distillation. However, most of the existing work focuses on only one of these aspects or regards them as one thing. This paper proposes a simple yet effective Hardness-aware GNN-to-MLP Distillation (HGMD) framework, which decouples the two hardnesses and estimates them using a non-parametric approach. Finally, two hardness-aware distillation schemes (i.e., HGMD-weight and HGMD-mixup) are further proposed to distill hardness-aware knowledge from teacher GNNs into the corresponding nodes of student MLPs. As non-parametric distillation, HGMD does not involve any additional learnable parameters beyond the student MLPs, but it still outperforms most of the state-of-the-art competitors. HGMD-mixup improves over the vanilla MLPs by 12.95% and outperforms its teacher GNNs by 2.48% averaged over seven real-world datasets.

Read more

7/23/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

AdaGMLP: AdaBoosting GNN-to-MLP Knowledge Distillation

Weigang Lu, Ziyu Guan, Wei Zhao, Yaming Yang

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have revolutionized graph-based machine learning, but their heavy computational demands pose challenges for latency-sensitive edge devices in practical industrial applications. In response, a new wave of methods, collectively known as GNN-to-MLP Knowledge Distillation, has emerged. They aim to transfer GNN-learned knowledge to a more efficient MLP student, which offers faster, resource-efficient inference while maintaining competitive performance compared to GNNs. However, these methods face significant challenges in situations with insufficient training data and incomplete test data, limiting their applicability in real-world applications. To address these challenges, we propose AdaGMLP, an AdaBoosting GNN-to-MLP Knowledge Distillation framework. It leverages an ensemble of diverse MLP students trained on different subsets of labeled nodes, addressing the issue of insufficient training data. Additionally, it incorporates a Node Alignment technique for robust predictions on test data with missing or incomplete features. Our experiments on seven benchmark datasets with different settings demonstrate that AdaGMLP outperforms existing G2M methods, making it suitable for a wide range of latency-sensitive real-world applications. We have submitted our code to the GitHub repository (https://github.com/WeigangLu/AdaGMLP-KDD24).

Read more

5/24/2024

Graph Knowledge Distillation to Mixture of Experts
Total Score

0

Graph Knowledge Distillation to Mixture of Experts

Pavel Rumiantsev, Mark Coates

In terms of accuracy, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are the best architectural choice for the node classification task. Their drawback in real-world deployment is the latency that emerges from the neighbourhood processing operation. One solution to the latency issue is to perform knowledge distillation from a trained GNN to a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), where the MLP processes only the features of the node being classified (and possibly some pre-computed structural information). However, the performance of such MLPs in both transductive and inductive settings remains inconsistent for existing knowledge distillation techniques. We propose to address the performance concerns by using a specially-designed student model instead of an MLP. Our model, named Routing-by-Memory (RbM), is a form of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE), with a design that enforces expert specialization. By encouraging each expert to specialize on a certain region on the hidden representation space, we demonstrate experimentally that it is possible to derive considerably more consistent performance across multiple datasets.

Read more

6/19/2024

Distilling the Knowledge in Data Pruning
Total Score

0

Distilling the Knowledge in Data Pruning

Emanuel Ben-Baruch, Adam Botach, Igor Kviatkovsky, Manoj Aggarwal, G'erard Medioni

With the increasing size of datasets used for training neural networks, data pruning becomes an attractive field of research. However, most current data pruning algorithms are limited in their ability to preserve accuracy compared to models trained on the full data, especially in high pruning regimes. In this paper we explore the application of data pruning while incorporating knowledge distillation (KD) when training on a pruned subset. That is, rather than relying solely on ground-truth labels, we also use the soft predictions from a teacher network pre-trained on the complete data. By integrating KD into training, we demonstrate significant improvement across datasets, pruning methods, and on all pruning fractions. We first establish a theoretical motivation for employing self-distillation to improve training on pruned data. Then, we empirically make a compelling and highly practical observation: using KD, simple random pruning is comparable or superior to sophisticated pruning methods across all pruning regimes. On ImageNet for example, we achieve superior accuracy despite training on a random subset of only 50% of the data. Additionally, we demonstrate a crucial connection between the pruning factor and the optimal knowledge distillation weight. This helps mitigate the impact of samples with noisy labels and low-quality images retained by typical pruning algorithms. Finally, we make an intriguing observation: when using lower pruning fractions, larger teachers lead to accuracy degradation, while surprisingly, employing teachers with a smaller capacity than the student's may improve results. Our code will be made available.

Read more

8/15/2024