Theoretical Analysis of Weak-to-Strong Generalization
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a theoretical analysis of the phenomenon of "weak-to-strong generalization" in machine learning models.
- Weak-to-strong generalization refers to the ability of a model trained on "weak" data (e.g., noisy or incomplete labels) to generalize well to "strong" data (e.g., clean, high-quality labels).
- The authors aim to quantify the potential gains from this phenomenon and develop a statistical framework to characterize it.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines a phenomenon in machine learning where a model trained on "weak" or lower-quality data can actually perform well on "strong" or higher-quality data. This is known as "weak-to-strong generalization." The researchers want to understand how and why this happens, and develop ways to measure the potential benefits.
Imagine you're training a model to recognize different types of animals. If you only have access to blurry or incomplete images of the animals, the model might still be able to learn the general features and patterns that distinguish them. Then, when you show the model clear, high-quality images, it can still perform well, even though it was trained on the lower-quality data.
The key insight is that the "weak" training data may still contain useful information that the model can latch onto and generalize from. The authors aim to quantify this effect and create a framework to better understand the conditions under which weak-to-strong generalization is possible. This could help researchers and engineers design more efficient and robust machine learning systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews the related work on understanding the phenomenon of weak-to-strong generalization, including prior attempts to characterize it theoretically.
The authors then set up a formal statistical framework to analyze the problem. This involves defining the "weak" and "strong" data distributions, as well as the model's ability to learn from the weak data and generalize to the strong data.
Using this framework, the paper derives new generalization bounds that quantify the potential gains from weak-to-strong generalization. These bounds depend on properties of the weak and strong data distributions, as well as the model's complexity.
The analysis also examines the convergence behavior of an adversarial weak supervision method, which can be used to leverage weak data sources to improve model performance.
Finally, the paper discusses the limitations of focusing solely on statistical generalization, and argues that understanding the phenomenon of weak-to-strong generalization requires a more holistic view of model behavior.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the weak-to-strong generalization phenomenon, which is an important and understudied aspect of machine learning. The authors' framework and derived bounds offer valuable insights into the conditions under which this effect can occur and the potential benefits it can provide.
However, the analysis is limited to a specific statistical setting and may not fully capture the complexities of real-world machine learning problems. For example, the paper does not consider the role of model architecture, optimization, or other factors that can influence a model's ability to learn from weak data and generalize to strong data.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the statistical properties of the data and the model, but does not explore the deeper cognitive and semantic aspects of how models acquire and generalize knowledge. As the authors acknowledge, understanding weak-to-strong generalization may require a more holistic view that goes beyond just statistical measures of performance.
Further research is needed to bridge the gap between the theoretical analysis and the practical realities of building effective machine learning systems that can leverage weak data sources to achieve strong performance. Exploring the connections between weak-to-strong generalization and other phenomena, such as context learning, may also yield important insights.
Conclusion
This paper presents a rigorous theoretical analysis of the phenomenon of "weak-to-strong generalization" in machine learning, where models trained on noisy or incomplete data can still perform well on high-quality data. The authors develop a statistical framework to characterize this effect and derive new generalization bounds that quantify the potential benefits.
The analysis offers valuable insights into the conditions and mechanisms underlying weak-to-strong generalization, and could help guide the design of more efficient and robust machine learning systems. However, the paper also highlights the limitations of focusing solely on statistical generalization, and suggests that a more holistic understanding of model behavior may be necessary to fully capture this complex phenomenon.
Overall, this work contributes to the growing body of research on understanding the capabilities and limitations of machine learning models, and points to promising directions for future exploration in this important area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Theoretical Analysis of Weak-to-Strong Generalization
Hunter Lang, David Sontag, Aravindan Vijayaraghavan
Strong student models can learn from weaker teachers: when trained on the predictions of a weaker model, a strong pretrained student can learn to correct the weak model's errors and generalize to examples where the teacher is not confident, even when these examples are excluded from training. This enables learning from cheap, incomplete, and possibly incorrect label information, such as coarse logical rules or the generations of a language model. We show that existing weak supervision theory fails to account for both of these effects, which we call pseudolabel correction and coverage expansion, respectively. We give a new bound based on expansion properties of the data distribution and student hypothesis class that directly accounts for pseudolabel correction and coverage expansion. Our bounds capture the intuition that weak-to-strong generalization occurs when the strong model is unable to fit the mistakes of the weak teacher without incurring additional error. We show that these expansion properties can be checked from finite data and give empirical evidence that they hold in practice.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Quantifying the Gain in Weak-to-Strong Generalization
Moses Charikar, Chirag Pabbaraju, Kirankumar Shiragur
Recent advances in large language models have shown capabilities that are extraordinary and near-superhuman. These models operate with such complexity that reliably evaluating and aligning them proves challenging for humans. This leads to the natural question: can guidance from weak models (like humans) adequately direct the capabilities of strong models? In a recent and somewhat surprising work, Burns et al. (2023) empirically demonstrated that when strong models (like GPT-4) are finetuned using labels generated by weak supervisors (like GPT-2), the strong models outperform their weaker counterparts -- a phenomenon they term weak-to-strong generalization. In this work, we present a theoretical framework for understanding weak-to-strong generalization. Specifically, we show that the improvement in performance achieved by strong models over their weaker counterparts is quantified by the misfit error incurred by the strong model on labels generated by the weaker model. Our theory reveals several curious algorithmic insights. For instance, we can predict the amount by which the strong model will improve over the weak model, and also choose among different weak models to train the strong model, based on its misfit error. We validate our theoretical findings through various empirical assessments.
Read more5/27/2024
🤯
0
A statistical framework for weak-to-strong generalization
Seamus Somerstep, Felipe Maia Polo, Moulinath Banerjee, Ya'acov Ritov, Mikhail Yurochkin, Yuekai Sun
Modern large language model (LLM) alignment techniques rely on human feedback, but it is unclear whether the techniques fundamentally limit the capabilities of aligned LLMs. In particular, it is unclear whether it is possible to align (stronger) LLMs with superhuman capabilities with (weaker) human feedback without degrading their capabilities. This is an instance of the weak-to-strong generalization problem: using weaker (less capable) feedback to train a stronger (more capable) model. We prove that weak-to-strong generalization is possible by eliciting latent knowledge from pre-trained LLMs. In particular, we cast the weak-to-strong generalization problem as a transfer learning problem in which we wish to transfer a latent concept from a weak model to a strong pre-trained model. We prove that a naive fine-tuning approach suffers from fundamental limitations, but an alternative refinement-based approach suggested by the problem structure provably overcomes the limitations of fine-tuning. Finally, we demonstrate the practical applicability of the refinement approach with three LLM alignment tasks.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Super(ficial)-alignment: Strong Models May Deceive Weak Models in Weak-to-Strong Generalization
Wenkai Yang, Shiqi Shen, Guangyao Shen, Zhi Gong, Yankai Lin
Superalignment, where humans are weak supervisors of superhuman models, has become an important and widely discussed issue in the current era of rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs). The recent work preliminarily studies this problem by using weak models to supervise strong models. It discovers that weakly supervised strong students can consistently outperform weak teachers towards the alignment target, leading to a weak-to-strong generalization phenomenon. However, we are concerned that behind such a promising phenomenon, whether there exists an issue of weak-to-strong deception, where strong models may deceive weak models by exhibiting well-aligned in areas known to weak models but producing misaligned behaviors in cases weak models do not know. We then take an initial step towards exploring this security issue in a specific but realistic multi-objective alignment case, where there may be some alignment targets conflicting with each other (e.g., helpfulness v.s. harmlessness). Such a conflict is likely to cause strong models to deceive weak models in one alignment dimension to gain high reward in other alignment dimension. Our experiments on both the reward modeling task and the preference optimization scenario indicate: (1) the weak-to-strong deception exists; (2) the deception phenomenon may intensify as the capability gap between weak and strong models increases. We also discuss potential solutions and find bootstrapping with an intermediate model can mitigate the deception to some extent. Our work highlights the urgent need to pay more attention to the true reliability of superalignment.
Read more6/18/2024