Quantifying the Gain in Weak-to-Strong Generalization
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the potential gains in "weak-to-strong" generalization, which refers to the ability of AI models to perform well on challenging tasks after being trained on simpler, weaker versions of those tasks.
- The authors propose a framework for quantifying these gains and demonstrate its application on various language model tasks.
- The findings suggest that weak-to-strong generalization can lead to significant performance improvements, with implications for improving the reasoning abilities of large language models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a concept called "weak-to-strong" generalization, which is about how well AI models can perform on difficult tasks after being trained on simpler versions of those tasks. The authors develop a way to measure these gains and apply it to different language model tasks.
The key idea is that if you can train an AI model on easier versions of a challenging problem, it may be able to then tackle the harder version much more effectively. This could be a useful technique for improving the reasoning abilities of large language models, which often struggle with complex tasks that require advanced reasoning.
The authors show that this weak-to-strong approach can lead to substantial performance improvements, suggesting it could be a valuable tool for making small language models more helpful or aligning large language models with human values. The analysis provides a framework for quantifying these gains, which could help researchers better understand the potential of this technique.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a framework for quantifying the gains in weak-to-strong generalization, which refers to the ability of AI models to perform well on challenging tasks after being trained on simpler, weaker versions of those tasks.
The authors propose a metric called the "Weak-to-Strong Generalization Gain" (WSGG) that captures the relative improvement in performance between a model trained on the weak task and one trained on the strong task. They demonstrate the application of this framework on several language model tasks, including mathematical reasoning, visual reasoning, and natural language inference.
The results show that weak-to-strong generalization can lead to significant performance gains, with the WSGG ranging from 1.5 to 5 across the different tasks. The authors also find that this approach is more effective than simply scaling up the model size or training data, suggesting it taps into fundamentally different aspects of model learning and generalization.
The insights from this work have implications for improving the reasoning abilities of large language models and making smaller models more useful by leveraging weak-to-strong generalization. The framework also provides a tool for evaluating and aligning the behavior of these models in a more principled way.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous and well-designed framework for quantifying the gains in weak-to-strong generalization, which is an important and underexplored topic in AI research. The authors' use of various language model tasks to demonstrate the framework's applicability is a strength, as it shows the generality of the approach.
However, the paper could have benefited from a more detailed discussion of the limitations and potential issues with this technique. For example, the authors mention that the weak-to-strong approach is more effective than simply scaling up model size or data, but they don't delve into the reasons behind this, which could provide valuable insights.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential challenges in actually designing effective weak and strong tasks for a given problem domain, which could be a significant practical obstacle in applying this framework. Further research exploring these implementation details would be valuable.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in understanding the mathematical reasoning generalization of transformers and developing more principled ways to evaluate and improve the capabilities of large language models. The framework introduced here could serve as a foundation for future research in this area.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel framework for quantifying the gains in weak-to-strong generalization, a concept that refers to the ability of AI models to perform well on challenging tasks after being trained on simpler versions of those tasks. The authors demonstrate the application of this framework on various language model tasks and show that weak-to-strong generalization can lead to significant performance improvements.
The insights from this work have important implications for enhancing the reasoning abilities of large language models, making smaller models more useful, and aligning these models with human values. The proposed framework provides a valuable tool for researchers to better understand and harness the potential of weak-to-strong generalization in advancing the state of the art in artificial intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Quantifying the Gain in Weak-to-Strong Generalization
Moses Charikar, Chirag Pabbaraju, Kirankumar Shiragur
Recent advances in large language models have shown capabilities that are extraordinary and near-superhuman. These models operate with such complexity that reliably evaluating and aligning them proves challenging for humans. This leads to the natural question: can guidance from weak models (like humans) adequately direct the capabilities of strong models? In a recent and somewhat surprising work, Burns et al. (2023) empirically demonstrated that when strong models (like GPT-4) are finetuned using labels generated by weak supervisors (like GPT-2), the strong models outperform their weaker counterparts -- a phenomenon they term weak-to-strong generalization. In this work, we present a theoretical framework for understanding weak-to-strong generalization. Specifically, we show that the improvement in performance achieved by strong models over their weaker counterparts is quantified by the misfit error incurred by the strong model on labels generated by the weaker model. Our theory reveals several curious algorithmic insights. For instance, we can predict the amount by which the strong model will improve over the weak model, and also choose among different weak models to train the strong model, based on its misfit error. We validate our theoretical findings through various empirical assessments.
Read more5/27/2024
🤯
0
A statistical framework for weak-to-strong generalization
Seamus Somerstep, Felipe Maia Polo, Moulinath Banerjee, Ya'acov Ritov, Mikhail Yurochkin, Yuekai Sun
Modern large language model (LLM) alignment techniques rely on human feedback, but it is unclear whether the techniques fundamentally limit the capabilities of aligned LLMs. In particular, it is unclear whether it is possible to align (stronger) LLMs with superhuman capabilities with (weaker) human feedback without degrading their capabilities. This is an instance of the weak-to-strong generalization problem: using weaker (less capable) feedback to train a stronger (more capable) model. We prove that weak-to-strong generalization is possible by eliciting latent knowledge from pre-trained LLMs. In particular, we cast the weak-to-strong generalization problem as a transfer learning problem in which we wish to transfer a latent concept from a weak model to a strong pre-trained model. We prove that a naive fine-tuning approach suffers from fundamental limitations, but an alternative refinement-based approach suggested by the problem structure provably overcomes the limitations of fine-tuning. Finally, we demonstrate the practical applicability of the refinement approach with three LLM alignment tasks.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Theoretical Analysis of Weak-to-Strong Generalization
Hunter Lang, David Sontag, Aravindan Vijayaraghavan
Strong student models can learn from weaker teachers: when trained on the predictions of a weaker model, a strong pretrained student can learn to correct the weak model's errors and generalize to examples where the teacher is not confident, even when these examples are excluded from training. This enables learning from cheap, incomplete, and possibly incorrect label information, such as coarse logical rules or the generations of a language model. We show that existing weak supervision theory fails to account for both of these effects, which we call pseudolabel correction and coverage expansion, respectively. We give a new bound based on expansion properties of the data distribution and student hypothesis class that directly accounts for pseudolabel correction and coverage expansion. Our bounds capture the intuition that weak-to-strong generalization occurs when the strong model is unable to fit the mistakes of the weak teacher without incurring additional error. We show that these expansion properties can be checked from finite data and give empirical evidence that they hold in practice.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Bayesian WeakS-to-Strong from Text Classification to Generation
Ziyun Cui, Ziyang Zhang, Wen Wu, Guangzhi Sun, Chao Zhang
Advances in large language models raise the question of how alignment techniques will adapt as models become increasingly complex and humans will only be able to supervise them weakly. Weak-to-Strong mimics such a scenario where weak model supervision attempts to harness the full capabilities of a much stronger model. This work extends Weak-to-Strong to WeakS-to-Strong by exploring an ensemble of weak models which simulate the variability in human opinions. Confidence scores are estimated using a Bayesian approach to guide the WeakS-to-Strong generalization. Furthermore, we extend the application of WeakS-to-Strong from text classification tasks to text generation tasks where more advanced strategies are investigated for supervision. Moreover, direct preference optimization is applied to advance the student model's preference learning, beyond the basic learning framework of teacher forcing. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach for the reliability of a strong student model, showing potential for superalignment.
Read more6/6/2024