Think-on-Graph 2.0: Deep and Interpretable Large Language Model Reasoning with Knowledge Graph-guided Retrieval
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces "Think-on-Graph 2.0", a deep and interpretable large language model (LLM) reasoning system that leverages knowledge graphs to enhance its retrieval and reasoning capabilities.
- The key innovation is the integration of knowledge graph-guided retrieval, which allows the model to access relevant information from a knowledge base during the reasoning process.
- This approach aims to combine the strengths of large language models, which excel at natural language understanding, with the structured knowledge and reasoning capabilities of knowledge graphs.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents an advanced language model called "Think-on-Graph 2.0" that can engage in more thoughtful and interpretable reasoning by using knowledge graphs. Knowledge graphs are structured databases that store information about the world in a way that's easily understandable by computers.
The main idea is to equip the language model with the ability to search through the knowledge graph and retrieve relevant facts and concepts to help it reason about and answer questions. This allows the model to go beyond just processing the language, and actually tap into a broader understanding of the world to inform its responses.
For example, if asked a question about the causes of climate change, the model could search the knowledge graph for information on topics like greenhouse gases, fossil fuels, and the carbon cycle. It could then use this knowledge to provide a more comprehensive and well-reasoned answer, rather than relying solely on the patterns it has learned from text.
The authors claim that this knowledge graph-guided approach makes the language model's reasoning process more transparent and interpretable, allowing users to better understand how it arrived at its conclusions. This could be especially useful in high-stakes applications where explainability is crucial, such as medical diagnosis or legal decision-making.
Technical Explanation
The "Think-on-Graph 2.0" system builds on previous work in graph-neural-retrieval-large-language and kg-rag-bridging-gap-between-knowledge-creativity, which explored the integration of knowledge graphs with large language models. The key innovation in this paper is the development of a more interpretable reasoning process that leverages the structured knowledge in the knowledge graph.
The core architecture consists of three main components:
- Knowledge Graph Encoder: This module encodes the knowledge graph into a format that can be efficiently queried by the language model.
- Retrieval Module: This component uses the query and the knowledge graph encoding to retrieve the most relevant concepts and facts from the knowledge base.
- Reasoning Module: The language model combines the retrieved information with the original query to generate an answer or response.
The authors conducted experiments on a range of question-answering and reasoning tasks, and found that the Think-on-Graph 2.0 system outperformed baseline language models that did not have access to the knowledge graph. Importantly, they also showed that the reasoning process was more interpretable, allowing users to understand how the model arrived at its conclusions by tracing the relevant knowledge graph concepts and facts that were accessed.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Knowledge Graph Quality and Coverage: The effectiveness of the system is heavily dependent on the quality and coverage of the underlying knowledge graph. If the knowledge graph is incomplete or contains inaccuracies, it could lead to suboptimal retrieval and reasoning.
-
Scalability: Querying and processing large knowledge graphs in real-time may pose challenges for scaling the system to handle very large language models and knowledge bases. The authors acknowledge this and suggest exploring more efficient knowledge graph encoding and retrieval techniques.
-
Bias and Fairness: As with any AI system, there are concerns about potential biases and fairness issues that could arise from the way the knowledge graph is constructed or the way the reasoning process is implemented. Further research is needed to understand and mitigate these risks.
-
Human-in-the-Loop Interaction: The paper focuses on the technical aspects of the system, but more research is needed on how users can effectively interact with and interpret the reasoning process, as suggested in enhanced-prompt-based-llm-reasoning-scheme-via and empowering-large-language-models-to-set-up.
-
Broader Implications: The ability to combine large language models with structured knowledge could have far-reaching implications for fields like logic-query-thoughts-guiding-large-language-models, where the interpretability and reasoning capabilities of the system are crucial.
Conclusion
The "Think-on-Graph 2.0" system presented in this paper represents an important step forward in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models. By integrating knowledge graph-guided retrieval, the model can access relevant factual information to inform its responses, resulting in more thoughtful and interpretable reasoning.
While there are still some challenges to address, this research opens up exciting possibilities for developing more powerful and transparent AI systems that can leverage structured knowledge to tackle complex tasks and provide reliable, explainable outputs. As the field of AI continues to evolve, approaches like this will play a crucial role in pushing the boundaries of what's possible.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Think-on-Graph 2.0: Deep and Interpretable Large Language Model Reasoning with Knowledge Graph-guided Retrieval
Shengjie Ma, Chengjin Xu, Xuhui Jiang, Muzhi Li, Huaren Qu, Jian Guo
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has significantly advanced large language models (LLMs) by enabling dynamic information retrieval to mitigate knowledge gaps and hallucinations in generated content. However, these systems often falter with complex reasoning and consistency across diverse queries. In this work, we present Think-on-Graph 2.0, an enhanced RAG framework that aligns questions with the knowledge graph and uses it as a navigational tool, which deepens and refines the RAG paradigm for information collection and integration. The KG-guided navigation fosters deep and long-range associations to uphold logical consistency and optimize the scope of retrieval for precision and interoperability. In conjunction, factual consistency can be better ensured through semantic similarity guided by precise directives. ToG${2.0}$ not only improves the accuracy and reliability of LLMs' responses but also demonstrates the potential of hybrid structured knowledge systems to significantly advance LLM reasoning, aligning it closer to human-like performance. We conducted extensive experiments on four public datasets to demonstrate the advantages of our method compared to the baseline.
Read more8/7/2024
0
GNN-RAG: Graph Neural Retrieval for Large Language Model Reasoning
Costas Mavromatis, George Karypis
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) represent human-crafted factual knowledge in the form of triplets (head, relation, tail), which collectively form a graph. Question Answering over KGs (KGQA) is the task of answering natural questions grounding the reasoning to the information provided by the KG. Large Language Models (LLMs) are the state-of-the-art models for QA tasks due to their remarkable ability to understand natural language. On the other hand, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely used for KGQA as they can handle the complex graph information stored in the KG. In this work, we introduce GNN-RAG, a novel method for combining language understanding abilities of LLMs with the reasoning abilities of GNNs in a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) style. First, a GNN reasons over a dense KG subgraph to retrieve answer candidates for a given question. Second, the shortest paths in the KG that connect question entities and answer candidates are extracted to represent KG reasoning paths. The extracted paths are verbalized and given as input for LLM reasoning with RAG. In our GNN-RAG framework, the GNN acts as a dense subgraph reasoner to extract useful graph information, while the LLM leverages its natural language processing ability for ultimate KGQA. Furthermore, we develop a retrieval augmentation (RA) technique to further boost KGQA performance with GNN-RAG. Experimental results show that GNN-RAG achieves state-of-the-art performance in two widely used KGQA benchmarks (WebQSP and CWQ), outperforming or matching GPT-4 performance with a 7B tuned LLM. In addition, GNN-RAG excels on multi-hop and multi-entity questions outperforming competing approaches by 8.9--15.5% points at answer F1.
Read more5/31/2024
0
WeKnow-RAG: An Adaptive Approach for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Integrating Web Search and Knowledge Graphs
Weijian Xie, Xuefeng Liang, Yuhui Liu, Kaihua Ni, Hong Cheng, Zetian Hu
Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly contributed to the development of adaptive intelligent agents and are positioned as an important way to achieve Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). However, LLMs are prone to produce factually incorrect information and often produce phantom content that undermines their reliability, which poses a serious challenge for their deployment in real-world scenarios. Enhancing LLMs by combining external databases and information retrieval mechanisms is an effective path. To address the above challenges, we propose a new approach called WeKnow-RAG, which integrates Web search and Knowledge Graphs into a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system. First, the accuracy and reliability of LLM responses are improved by combining the structured representation of Knowledge Graphs with the flexibility of dense vector retrieval. WeKnow-RAG then utilizes domain-specific knowledge graphs to satisfy a variety of queries and domains, thereby improving performance on factual information and complex reasoning tasks by employing multi-stage web page retrieval techniques using both sparse and dense retrieval methods. Our approach effectively balances the efficiency and accuracy of information retrieval, thus improving the overall retrieval process. Finally, we also integrate a self-assessment mechanism for the LLM to evaluate the trustworthiness of the answers it generates. Our approach proves its outstanding effectiveness in a wide range of offline experiments and online submissions.
Read more8/29/2024
0
KG-RAG: Bridging the Gap Between Knowledge and Creativity
Diego Sanmartin
Ensuring factual accuracy while maintaining the creative capabilities of Large Language Model Agents (LMAs) poses significant challenges in the development of intelligent agent systems. LMAs face prevalent issues such as information hallucinations, catastrophic forgetting, and limitations in processing long contexts when dealing with knowledge-intensive tasks. This paper introduces a KG-RAG (Knowledge Graph-Retrieval Augmented Generation) pipeline, a novel framework designed to enhance the knowledge capabilities of LMAs by integrating structured Knowledge Graphs (KGs) with the functionalities of LLMs, thereby significantly reducing the reliance on the latent knowledge of LLMs. The KG-RAG pipeline constructs a KG from unstructured text and then performs information retrieval over the newly created graph to perform KGQA (Knowledge Graph Question Answering). The retrieval methodology leverages a novel algorithm called Chain of Explorations (CoE) which benefits from LLMs reasoning to explore nodes and relationships within the KG sequentially. Preliminary experiments on the ComplexWebQuestions dataset demonstrate notable improvements in the reduction of hallucinated content and suggest a promising path toward developing intelligent systems adept at handling knowledge-intensive tasks.
Read more5/21/2024